|
|
Will you consider getting married with a prenup?
12-06-2020, 04:52 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 146
|
Will you consider getting married with a prenup?
I have been married 3 times and I'm currently in a new relationship with a very nice lady and she has her own business and assets + 0 debt.
I'm not too incline about getting married, but if I decide to make that decision down the road it will have to be with a prenup agreement. For those of you that have been through this situation before, are prenups good enough to keep all of my assets safe in case of some major "disaster"?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
12-06-2020, 05:05 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,113
|
With your track record, unless you are a widower, I don't think it is a good idea for HER.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:09 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
|
Unless you plan to have kids, then no.
Editorial comment: 3 times!!! I question your sanity.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:10 PM
|
#4
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 234
|
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:12 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 18,727
|
*subscribed*!
__________________
*********Go Yankees!*********
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:22 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,999
|
Has she been married before? Is she looking to get married? If you are not planning on having kids and you want to keep your assets separate, there may not be enough benefits to justify taking the risk of a fourth marriage not working out.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:34 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 9,514
|
I sure wouldn't get married.
I had a friend his name was Henry. He was married 8 times when I knew him well. I always called him Henry the VIII even thou the real Henry the VIII, had only 6 different wives. He was so high on life when he found a new love. I'm not sure I could have lead his life style but he was always happy in life.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:35 PM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,655
|
I know a gentleman who cautioned his beloved that two of his three previous wives had died - but she married him anyway, and they seem quite content (she's healthy - for now, anyway, bwah hah!).
I don't know if they have prenups, though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by teejayevans
Unless you plan to have kids, then no.
Editorial comment: 3 times!!! I question your sanity.
|
__________________
If you understood everything I say, you'd be me ~ Miles Davis
'There is only one success – to be able to spend your life in your own way.’ Christopher Morley.
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:36 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,157
|
Never.
I should say....I would never get married again. No need for a prenup.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:38 PM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,259
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by street
I sure wouldn't get married.
I had a friend his name was Henry. He was married 8 times when I knew him well. I always called him Henry the VIII even thou the real Henry the VIII, had only 6 different wives. He was so high on life when he found a new love. I'm not sure I could have lead his life style but he was always happy in life.
|
I’m amazed at wives number four through eight. What were they thinking?
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:50 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 9,514
|
^ Yeah! I always though the same thing. He was no freeloader either was a good hard working great person. They kept marrying him. Lol
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:50 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,600
|
Two prenup cases within my family:
Case #1: a frugal but poor relative married a wealthy guy. My relative described negotiating and signing the prenup as being extremely unpleasant. She was treated like a gold-digger by her fiance's lawyers (yes, plural). Her fiance showed her his investments while they were dating. I remember how excited she was by his wealth, so his lawyers may have had a point. A certain kind of honey attracts a certain kind of bear .
Case #2: a wealthy relative married a relatively poor guy. I was actually seated at the table for that prenup signing event. For years the guy had lingering resentment over being "forced" to sign a prenup. His argument: "If you really love me, you would trust me to dispose of your assets as you desire after your death." Ouch! How do you respond to "If you really love me ... " type arguments?
To me, the whole prenup situation is rather strange: you agree to get married under the laws of a certain state and then try to replace a certain portion of those laws with your own directives. Why get married in the first place? Well, like paying off a mortgage the decision to get married might be both an emotional issue and financial issue. The emotions say "yes!" and the finances say "no!". Who do you listen to?
As to whether prenups actually work, google might be your friend. There are plenty of anecdotal stories around of prenups failing to do the job.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:53 PM
|
#13
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,500
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormy Kromer
Never.
I should say....I would never get married again. No need for a prenup.
|
+1
Frank and I met back in 2000 on an internet dating site. I told him on our first date that I wanted a relationship with no limits on emotional commitment but no marriage, no living together, and no mixing of money or financial assets.
Having heard many horror stories about gold diggers, he thought that was a great idea. We both feel like we are too old to start over again from scratch.
We are simply NOT interested in government enforcement of any financial agreements. We just want to be with each other.
A very top notch attorney once told me that all preconceptions aside, there is no such thing as a completely bullet-proof prenup if confronted by a good enough legal team. I tend to believe him, but either way it's irrelevant to me since I have no desire to marry again.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.
Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 05:56 PM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 5,316
|
After my father died my mother (in her 60s) married a very nice man (in his 70s). Both had their own assets and wanted to keep them separate so they mutually agreed to do a prenup. Worked great for them.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 06:02 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Santa Paula
Posts: 4,076
|
I was widowed and remarried. We keep all our stuff separate, so there is no problem. Even in a community property state, if the assets are not commingled, there should not be a problem.
__________________
Retired Jan 2009 Have not looked back.
AA 60/35/5 considering SS and pensions a SP annuity
WR 2% with 2SS & 2 Pensions
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 06:03 PM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,655
|
I've always felt your approach was a wise one.
For one thing, it puts off any swains who are thinking wistfully of having someone around again to make sandwiches, ensure the toilets get cleaned regularly, and remember his grandchildren's birthdays.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W2R
+1
Frank and I met back in 2000 on an internet dating site. I told him on our first date that I wanted a relationship with no limits on emotional commitment but no marriage, no living together, and no mixing of money or financial assets.
n.
|
__________________
If you understood everything I say, you'd be me ~ Miles Davis
'There is only one success – to be able to spend your life in your own way.’ Christopher Morley.
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 06:19 PM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 5,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Souschef
I was widowed and remarried. We keep all our stuff separate, so there is no problem. Even in a community property state, if the assets are not commingled, there should not be a problem.
|
There could be a problem at death. In many states if there is no prenup a surviving spouse has the right to a certain percentage of the estate of the first spouse to die. This right to inherit can be waived by a prenup so that each spouse can give his or her assets to his or her children at death.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 06:33 PM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,259
|
The above argument is pure nonsense.
Trust based upon love does not mean that you trust a person to go very near the flames of temptation, but somehow not get burned by them. Trust means you trust that person to walk away from the flames before he/she can feel the heat or see much of the light.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 06:48 PM
|
#19
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 394
|
I don't have an opinion on whether you should get married, but I do know there are significant potential financial benefits to being married as opposed to simply living with a person. These may or may not apply to your situation. Some of them include:
Spouses are eligible for social security spousal benefits while alive and survivor benefits upon the death of one spouse. These are most relevant if one spouse has a significantly higher SS benefit than the other.
A 401k or IRA has better RMD options when left to a spouse as opposed to a non-spouse.
If you live in a community property state, if you elect to make some of your assets community property, a surviving spouse gets a full step up for the community property. So, if John and Mary each have $100,000 in non retirement assets each of which has a $50,000 basis and they combine their accounts and declare them community property, then upon the death of either, the survivor has $200,000 with a basis of $200,000. Better than $200,000 with a basis of $150,000 which would be the case if they did not get married and left the account to the survivor.
In California, a spouse may inherit a residence's property tax basis from a spouse. This could be a very valuable benefit due to Proposition 13, if one spouse has held a property for a long time.
Many other potential benefits related to employment and insurance.
Sorry but I would like to go on a little rant: I often hear or read derogatory comments directed toward couples that opt for a prenup. When I married my spouse, we had a prenup executed. We got married fairly late in life and will not have children. We each have our own assets that we would like to see go to our own relatives when we are both deceased. With the advice and help of a few attorneys, we put a plan in place to do this by executing a prenup wherein we keep separate property (including our retirement accounts). Our estate plans are coordinated with our prenup such that a surviving spouse can use the assets of the first deceased spouse. Upon the death of the surviving spouse, the unused assets of each spouse pass to each spouse's designated beneficiaries. My point in saying all this is that for us a prenup was crucial to assuring our wishes have the best chance of being executed. Anyone who tells me prenups are useless or taint a marriage is in my opinion displaying ignorance and intolerance. There are many other reasons couples elect to have prenups and my opinion is that as long as a couple is in agreement on the terms without coercion, no one is qualified to pass judgment on their choices.
Regarding the enforceability of a prenup, we were told by several family and estate attorneys that in California it is very difficult to successfully contest a well executed prenup. In California, the standard for throwing out a prenup is that it be "unconscionable", or not have met some statutory requirement such as each side having their own counsel et. al. Now, if one of the parties is a billionaire, or one of the parties is being left with meager resources, the calculus will be different. But if a couple has a prenup executed properly with reasonable terms, it is very unlikely to be contested at all, let alone contested successfully.
Anyway, to the OP, be aware there are some financial benefits only marriage can confer. A properly executed prenup is a legal option to substitute mutually agreed upon divorce terms over the default in your state and no one should feel their marriage is any less if this is elected. Finally, best wishes to both of you whatever you decide!
|
|
|
12-06-2020, 07:03 PM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,655
|
Let us not forget the lower income tax rate for "married filing jointly" as opposed to "single." Although that may be more relevant to a widow/widower who receives a survivor benefit, than to a couple who choose to remain unmarried.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratchy
I don't have an opinion on whether you should get married, but I do know for a fact that there are significant potential financial benefits to being married as opposed to simply living with a person. These may or may not apply to your situation. Some of them include:
!
|
__________________
If you understood everything I say, you'd be me ~ Miles Davis
'There is only one success – to be able to spend your life in your own way.’ Christopher Morley.
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|