Where to relocate ???

Another thing I wish there was a site for is microclimates. There have to be places that buck the trend of the rest of their state because they are in the shadow of a moutain or have a big lake or eleveation that influences their weather enough that they'd be considered to have much better weather than the surrounding areas.

Sometimes the place name will give a strong hint. DW's niece went to college in Frostburg, MD. She will tell you the town is named appropriately. An essential piece of gear there is a snow shovel.
 
I'll be curious to hear where you headin', Yoheadden.
 
It has been my experience that the taxes and cost of living reflect how desirable a place is. Look at any real estate section in a newspaper (or Zillow). The priciest houses are always in the most desirable locations. I also live in CT. My money would go further almost anywhere in the country, but I don't think I would want to live there. I don't need a bigger house than we have already. For context, I've lived in 33 different places, in 14 different states, and 2 different countries. We like it here the best, and we planned our retirement to accommodate the taxes and cost of living.

Ultimately, you have to balance your own financial needs with your other desires, but I would keep in mind that the grass is not always greener, even if you do get the big house and large lot with lower taxes. I wish you well in whatever you decide.

I would agree with a lot of what you said and Milford does have a lot going for it. I’m not too far away. I’m in Seymour. They say “Home is where your heart is” and my heart isn’t here anymore. I think after having a small business for 20+ years, I’m ready for a change of scenery. I don’t need or want a big home, just a place with a decent view. I believe the trick is to figure out what you value and makes you happiest and then find an area that allows you to do them.
 
Most people don't relocate in retirement, just FYI -- at least, not across state lines. The stats I read said that 1% to 2% of retired people moved out of state over a 5-year period. If you figure the average retirement is about 20 years, that would mean an average of 4 to 8% of retired folks relocate to a different state over the course of their retirement. I'm sure a higher percentage move within city or state lines, but moving out of state is actually a pretty uncommon thing.

My own experience, briefly: Before retirement, I planned on moving to another state. I spent lots of time researching all the options. I did multiple analyses from many points of view -- charts and graphs, pros and cons, the whole nine yards, several times over.

In the end, I stayed put. Why? Because I like it here well enough, and moving is a pain in the butt. There was no other place that called me strong enough to overcome those two factors.

Sorry if I missed it, but where is it that you decided to stay ?
 
Durango was our list until I saw the average snow fall is 67 inches.
Sedona was in consideration, but our neighbors have a condo there and they are looking to sell. They said it’s getting over loved. Traffic, hard to go for a bike ride, waits at restaurants.
The key is to discover the next cool place before everyone else does.
It's a dry snow. [emoji849]

Durango is crowded and very expensive. They're expanding the east side but eventually they're going to have a more serious traffic issue as people attempt to crowd into the real town.
 
There are a number of those, but the most remarkable example of that phenomenon I'm aware of is the Olympic Peninsula of northwest Washington. Look at Port Angeles, Sequim, and Port Townsend. Just across from Victoria, BC. Also right near Seattle. That area is in the "rain shadow" of the Olympic Mountains, and gets way less rain and more sunshine than the rest of the region. Pretty nice place.

I heard about that magical sounding place a few years ago and looked up the rainfall and sunny days numbers but didn't find it to be significantly better than Seattle or other areas around there. It sounds like a unicorn a bit. Plus it only gets like 132 sunny days a year according to one website I saw (compared to a place like Las Vegas with 294). Would be interesting to hear from someone that lives there if it really is different and for some reason the online stats I have seen are just wrong.
 
It has been my experience that the taxes and cost of living reflect how desirable a place is. Look at any real estate section in a newspaper (or Zillow). The priciest houses are always in the most desirable locations. I also live in CT. My money would go further almost anywhere in the country, but I don't think I would want to live there. I don't need a bigger house than we have already. For context, I've lived in 33 different places, in 14 different states, and 2 different countries. We like it here the best, and we planned our retirement to accommodate the taxes and cost of living.

Ultimately, you have to balance your own financial needs with your other desires, but I would keep in mind that the grass is not always greener, even if you do get the big house and large lot with lower taxes. I wish you well in whatever you decide.



I’ll wave to you when I pack up in 5 years, and retire somewhere else. I like NE, (lived here my whole life), but IMO CT is the armpit of NE. [emoji846]
 
I was born, schooled, and worked in Connecticut until 1981. That was when the state had no income tax and it had good jobs (manufacturing for me). Now being gone since then, and living in Texas, every time I go back to visit my remaining family, it's quite depressing to me since the larger towns are dying. The state is one of the top 5 in the U.S. that is losing population (2016 data).

My sister still lives in Waterbury, which now rated as one of the worst cities in the U.S. to live in (city is broke, high crime, no good jobs). Unfortunately, she is stuck there (family), although her grown grandchildren are leaving the state to find work after graduating. One relocated to Houston two years ago.

I loved the state when I was there for 1/2 my life. The change of seasons are nice and the state has great charm and beauty, but taxes are a problem and it's expensive to live there. Most of my high school/college and work related friends are gone, many relocating to Florida. Texas is home for us now.
 
I’ll wave to you when I pack up in 5 years, and retire somewhere else. I like NE, (lived here my whole life), but IMO CT is the armpit of NE. [emoji846]
I'm sure we'll miss you.
 
I looked for an easy city finder quiz as well and never found anything very good. Instead, we had a spreadsheet where we listed as much data as possible regarding locations and where possible tried to use shortcuts.

Gumby, I also used the usda and sunset hardiness maps to narrow down parts of the country we were interested in, based on climate, which was our first screen.

Then we looked at state income and property taxes, proximity to top medical care/international airports, college towns, school rankings, food/dining options, aca, etc... We also looked at store locations as surrogates for population traits—so proximity to Whole Foods, Costco or an Apple store for example. I figured these huge corporations had much larger market research budgets than I did and they would be pretty good at picking locations where we would fit.

IMO, it’s important to have a large list of your ideal place qualities, with as much detail/thought as possible and think outside the box a bit. Then you can start to narrow down regions and towns and really do research and look for the intangibles that you may miss on an initial screen.

Ultimately, due to life circumstances, our choice wasn’t as logical as I would have liked, but the weather is good, which goes a long way. We could have picked a less expensive location and probably ended up with a similar lifestyle, which would have given us more flex in our budget.

Our ‘surprise’ has been the wildlife here. I grew up in the country, so wanted a more rural life, but the abundance of rattlesnakes and coyotes was unexpected. It’s made life with young kids and pets more complicated and stressful. In hindsight, I wish I’d understood how much the wildlife populations had changed. If we had done a test run this would have come out.
 
My part of Connecticut is Zone 7a, which means that the coldest it got in those 30 years was between 0 and 5 deg. F. Other places in Zone 7a include Richmond VA, Asheville NC and Nashville TN. Virtually all of Kentucky is in Zone 6b, which is colder. Here's a map from USDA. https://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/PHZMWeb/Images/All_states_halfzones_poster_rgb_300dpi.pdf

According to that map, I'm in 7b, so howdy, neighbor! :) The old house, which is less than 15 miles as the crow flies, is 7a.

FWIW, I don't think those charts mean the coldest it got was 0-5 deg F. I think what they did was took the lowest temp for each year, and averaged them. 2019-2020 has been a mild winter so far (and probably will finish that way since the bulk of it has passed, at least here in MD). But, low single digits are pretty common around here in the winter, and we've gone negative a few times (at least in 7a...haven't been here in 7b that long yet). The winter of '93-94 was about the worst I can remember for cold temps. We had a few nights where it got down to -12 or so!

I was curious about property taxes up there, so I pulled up some real estate listings on Zillow, for Milford. I found one house that was somewhat comparable to mine...similar vintage, similar square footage, and both have a pool. Similar price as well. Smaller lot in Milford, but out in the boonies, an extra large lot doesn't always command an extra-big price, unless you can subdivide...and I can't. Anyway, Zillow showed the Milford house's taxes at around $8800, for a house with a $640K asking price. My house, in Maryland, was $630K, and its taxes are around $4800. One notable difference is my house is on well/septic, whereas the Milford house is on city water/sewer, which is going to raise the property taxes.

So, while I always hear about areas up north hitting you up with high property tax bills, that actually doesn't sound *too* bad. I wouldn't be happy about paying an extra $4,000 per year in property taxes, but if I was living there, and happy otherwise, I wouldn't uproot my life just to save $4K (or even a bit more, since the typical CT transplant probably moves to a lower-cost state than MD!)

Just curious, how long is swimming pool season up there, do you know? In 2019, the earliest I went in was around mid-May, and I had it closed up on September 23. I probably could have kept it open a bit longer, but I wanted it closed up before the trees started dropping their leaves in full force. In 2018 I was late getting on a closing schedule with the pool company, and they weren't able to close it until October 31. I think the last time I actually went in it was early October, and it was really a hassle during that time, fishing all the leaves and crap out of it.
 
In Connecticut, real property tax is based on assessed value, which is 70% of what the assessor thinks the market value is. The formula is: property tax = assessed value X mill rate (mill rate is in 1/1000ths). The mill rate is different for each of the 169 town and cities in the state and changes every year. In Milford, the mill rate is currently 27.71. So, for your Zillow example, if the house sells for its asking price of $640k, it will soon have an assessed value of $448k ($640 x .7) and the property taxes will be $12,414 (448 x 27.71). There is an add on for the sewer which is on a simple per house basis. This year, it is $323 per house. We pay the regional water authority for our water. In 2019, our bill was $652.

Three of my nearby neighbors had swimming pools when I moved here 30 years ago, but they have since filled them in, as the outdoor unheated swimming pool season is too short (generally Memorial Day to Labor Day, from what I can see) to be worth all the hassle of maintaining the pool. Although I do know people who have pools, use them every day in the summer and find it to be worthwhile.

P.S. - You are right about the averaging for the USDA zones; my writing was not very clear.

P.P.S - In comparing relative tax burden, it is important to note that we don't have any county government in CT. We pay property tax (on house and cars) to our town or city and income tax to the state. That's it. With rare exception in more rural areas, we don't have separate fire district, school district, library district taxes like they do in some places. Nor do we have any local income tax, as they did when I lived in the Midwest. One of the other effects of not having county government is that it makes comparisons of the state's bonded debt with other states difficult, since in many states, the county incurs the debt for many bonded projects.
 
Last edited:
I have used the where to retire function on marketwatch.com under the retirement tab. You put in up to five must have and up to five would be nice to get some options. Some of the places I was already looking at would come up.

I'm starting the move process by interviewing real estate agents, purging more junk and some boxing. I hope to be done with the process by early summer. Staying in Colorado, just going west.
 
Sorry if I missed it, but where is it that you decided to stay ?

Small town in Mississippi. People are friendly, there is a palpable sense of community, cost of living is low, it's uncrowded, and it has an active OLLI. The main downsides are the summer and the trad-con dominance, but everything is a trade-off.

I thought that I'd be leaving after I retired, but I discovered that the grass is not always greener, and I'd grown more roots here than I realized.
 
Last edited:
I heard about that magical sounding place a few years ago and looked up the rainfall and sunny days numbers but didn't find it to be significantly better than Seattle or other areas around there. It sounds like a unicorn a bit. Plus it only gets like 132 sunny days a year according to one website I saw (compared to a place like Las Vegas with 294). Would be interesting to hear from someone that lives there if it really is different and for some reason the online stats I have seen are just wrong.

Doesn't Moses Lake or some place in eastern Washington get something like 300 sunny days a year?
 
About 5 years out from retiring I started using the many websites and magazine articles about places to retire. I found them to be of minor help. So I sat down and started making up a long list of what I would like as well as not like in my ultimate retirement location (weather, climate, COL, taxes, outdoor activities, proximity to colleges/universities, proximity to military base, states and countries, size of the town/city, etc.) Then prioritized the quite extensive list. Then it became a search through the various city websites.
It took a few years of wading through it all but when I was finished it turned out I was already there. :dance: It seems like I made the right choice about 50 years earlier and had been enjoying a semi-retirement lifestyle for all those years.



Cheers!
 
... Then prioritized the quite extensive list. Then it became a search through the various city websites.

It took a few years of wading through it all but when I was finished it turned out I was already there.

lol, same here.
 
I've noticed that these "Where to Retire" articles always list the best cities.

I have no intention of living in a city. I'm on the fence about a suburb. Rural would be preferable, but that has to be balanced by availability of stores and services.
 
When I joined this board, my DW, and I fully planned on finding a large acreage lot (25-100 acres) in Kentucky, or Tennessee, and building our dream homestead away from the bustle of a big city.

We ended up deciding to make the 10 acre farm where we have been for 25 years better, and turn it into our dream homestead. We already have horses, chickens, lots of equipment in two large barns (including an indoor riding arena). All of this would have been a monumental undertaking to set up infrastructure, and move 400 miles South from Northern Ohio.
 
It has been my experience that the taxes and cost of living reflect how desirable a place is. Look at any real estate section in a newspaper (or Zillow). The priciest houses are always in the most desirable locations.
...
Most desirable to whom, though? I have no interest at all in living in pricey places like NYC/SW CT, or LA. A big reason they are so pricey is for the job market there, which is of no importance to a retiree. I just don't think one should use taxes and COL at all as a criteria for desirability.
 
Most desirable to whom, though? I have no interest at all in living in pricey places like NYC/SW CT, or LA. A big reason they are so pricey is for the job market there, which is of no importance to a retiree. I just don't think one should use taxes and COL at all as a criteria for desirability.

Isn't that precisely how economics works? If demand is high for something that has relatively limited supply (like houses), then price is high.

If I were driven solely by economics, I would spend my career in NYC (as I did for part of it), hoover up the associated high salary while living like a pauper to save my money, and then move to the Missouri Ozarks, where much of my family lives and I could live in riches on my retirement savings. Things are really inexpensive there, in large measure because there is no work and not much to do. The area has some natural beauty, but it is really hot in the summer and cold in the winter. And it's far from the airport.

I like to get good value for my money, but I never have and never will do something just because that is the most economical. I want to live a good life, not a cheap one.
 
Isn't that precisely how economics works? If demand is high for something that has relatively limited supply (like houses), then price is high.

...

I like to get good value for my money, but I never have and never will do something just because that is the most economical. I want to live a good life, not a cheap one.
I know how economics works. Your post was just irrelevant relative to the OP.

OP was asking where to locate in retirement.

You replied that taxes and COL indicates desirability.

My point was intended to be: I just don't think [-]one [/-]retirees should use high taxes and COL at all as a criteria for desirability.

The reason for this is that retirees would probably be paying a premium price to live in a place because of the demand primarily created by people still working.

That does not mean one should live in the most economical place. They should live in the place that most meets their retirement needs. If it's beyond their affordability they should keep looking.
 
I know how economics works. Your post was just irrelevant relative to the OP.

OP was asking where to locate in retirement.

You replied that taxes and COL indicates desirability.

My point was intended to be: I just don't think [-]one [/-]retirees should use high taxes and COL at all as a criteria for desirability.

The reason for this is that retirees would probably be paying a premium price to live in a place because of the demand primarily created by people still working.

That does not mean one should live in the most economical place. They should live in the place that most meets their retirement needs. If it's beyond their affordability they should keep looking.

And I think retirees who principally focus on moving somewhere "cheaper" may be setting themselves for disappointment. There's a lot more to life than just dollars in your pocket. I'm sure we've all had the experience of buying something cheap that turns out to disappoint us. Then we quickly forget how cheap it was.
 
Back
Top Bottom