Westernskies
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- May 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,864
Face it...we're in the lumpen slums of cyberspace....
Let me Google that for you...
Face it...we're in the lumpen slums of cyberspace....
Let me Google that for you...
I have a couple of engineering degrees, yet only worked 18 years in the field before retiring. I was very successful (and lucky too - no doubt). I don't see my degrees as a "waste". And 18 years was all I needed to feel that I got everything I wanted out of that career, and I was ready to move on to other things.......
Judging from pms ER isn't all wine and roses for everyone.
My hero to the rescue................Let me Google that for you...
I have a feeling the market rout of 2007-2008 has caused some to panic and sell out at a low point. They would be afraid to admit having done so, for fear of being ridiculed. I wouldn't blame anybody though. I was scared, and if I weren't having a part-time job, I would be even more scared. And I did raise my cash steadily in 07 and early 08. Else, I might not be here posting.Judging from pms ER isn't all wine and roses for everyone.
Yes, there are many type As here.Even those of us who have left competition behind can be a bit competitive about ER.
Retirement does not stave off marital unhappiness or illnesses. But imagine how miserable one would be, being sick and needing to work to maintain health insurance. Or like one of my cousins, an oral surgeon who had to keep some minimal hours at her private practice to stay afloat while undergoing cancer treatments.Also, some just don't want to talk about their post retirement divorce or whatever unpleasantness happened their way.
And doing what you don't love - just to earn a livelihood - isn't either.But "doing what you love" is not necessarily all fun and games either...
According to Fisker, it’s a “waste” for someone to spend 16 years acquiring an education and then retire after only 10 .
Judging from pms ER isn't all wine and roses for everyone.
.
You are so right . It's still life with all it's pitfalls minus a job.........
I'll see your @$$h0le boss and raise with one who called the day of your father's funeral to [-]offer sympathy[/-] talk business and 'suggest' the best way to deal with your loss was to immediately return to work. This is the same boss who called you a few hours after you had surgery (still groggy from the general anesthesia) to [-]wish you a speedy recovery[/-] complain about your office manager and insist you fire her............and an @$$h0le boss telling you to cancel your vacation the day before you are scheduled to leave or calling you at home on a Sunday to give you an "urgent" assignment.
I'll bet if he had surgery no one would want to [-]waste[/-] use anesthesia on him...This is the same boss who called you a few hours after you had surgery (still groggy from the general anesthesia) to [-]wish you a speedy recovery[/-] complain about your office manager and insist you fire her...
I'll see your @$$h0le boss and raise with one who called the day of your father's funeral to [-]offer sympathy[/-] talk business and 'suggest' the best way to deal with your loss was to immediately return to work. This is the same boss who called you a few hours after you had surgery (still groggy from the general anesthesia) to [-]wish you a speedy recovery[/-] complain about your office manager and insist you fire her...
And I'll also raise the #$%^ boss who didn't know crap about computers but just knew that as a female I must be screwing up and didn't believe anything I told him & would call up the guy who did maintenance to check my work?
Maintenance guy would tell $%^& boss he was full of it.
But you did make the coffee before calling, yes? [ducking]And I'll also raise the #$%^ boss who didn't know crap about computers but just knew that as a female I must be screwing up and didn't believe anything I told him & would call up the guy who did maintenance to check my work?
Precisely. And it's also why a lot of occupations that many people find personally fulfilling have crappy pay (even if it requires a lot of skill and/or education). The less people want to do something, the more you have to pay them to do it.There is a reason why people are paid to work!
Well, it's basically just a twist on the old protestant work ethic.
This is likely true. However, there is a reason that Germany is bailing out Greece, and not the other way around.
Also, the US as it was in the past is a stunning achievment of people with the Protestant work ethic.
Ha
I think a big part of the conversation is:
Do you want your life to be self-directed? Or other-directed.
In a career - half your waking life is other-directed. In the more demanding professional careers where you are expected to put in way more than a 40 hour work week, it may be way more than half.
Even if you are the boss - your work is directed by paying clients. You may have a lot more control over your work life than do your employees, but your customers ultimately direct your work.
The beauty of financial independence is that you no longer are beholden to someone else's direction because you no longer need to earn your living. At this point you can pick and choose assignments and clients if you run your own business. If you are still an employee you may have a little more flexibility, but you would probably have to change careers if you wanted a lot more autonomy over your work life. There is still the high degree of "hassle factor" associated with most careers.
Most people don't work because they love it. Most people work because they have to. For most people, work is mostly about earning a living until they don't have to any more.
I get the feeling a lot of folks are uncomfortable about the idea of having a self-directed life (beyond choosing the career or job). I suppose that this is understandable considering that we are trained from birth to do someone else's bidding.
But one thing I really don't understand is how anyone can feel there is something morally wrong with "doing your own thing" rather than doing what you are assigned by someone else. That's the struggle the author of this article really seems to have. Well, it's basically just a twist on the old protestant work ethic.
Ultimately, he is saying that you can only "reach your full potential" if your activities are directed by someone else. And there are no requirements for how "evolved" or "superior" the boss or hiring organization need to be in order to create the environment that lets you achieve this ultimate fulfillment.
So funny. It's the absolute opposite of the Greek philosophers who strongly believed that work (for hire) corrupts achievement, and that it's only through activities done in leisure time that one can reach their full potential.
Audrey