ERD50 - When I became aware of google urchin being used, i posted a concern. Google tracks anything you do off of its search engine.
Concern is fine. But I have yet to understand how Google ads pose any real threat to users of this forum. You have only mentioned vague threats.
I fail to see any upside for me... only possible down side.
UPSIDE: Andy gets paid, the site remains free. We 'pay' for it with some fairly innocuous ads on each page that are pretty easily ignored.
Most of the magazines I subscribe to have ads. OMG, they have my address, my CC number, and now they know my interests. No big deal to me. Google ads no big deal to me.
It is a personal choice for me, but I do not use an ad blocker on any of the 'free' sites I visit regularly. I figure that is the price of admission. I make an exception if they start doing the obnoxious flashing interruptive ads, and I let the site admin know about it.
Now it appears that your motivation is to invalidate the concern, or you are just fishing for a reaction, or just want to argue on the matter.
No, I simply do not understand the concern. I'm not fishing for a reaction, but I am a little concerned that your view might be picked up by others as a major concern, and in a small way, that could negatively impact this site (fewer visitors, less traffic for Andy, etc, etc, etc)
I have no interest in trying to convince you of anything.
Fine, I'm just trying to put this in perspective. I'm actually much more concerned that someone walks in my house and steals my computer and searches through my hard drive. I don't go through the effort to keep everything encrypted. That is a real concern, and I really should do something about it. I think the threat from this is 1,000,000x the threat from a Google ad.
Is your phone line secure? Do you know people can just tap in anywhere from your house to the pole and monitor your conversations? All it takes is a standard phone and alligator clips. I've always been amazed that people demand encryption on web sites for financial transactions, but will give all that info over the phone to a representative of a company (who may be a crook who got the job just to get this data), and they don't demand a secure phone line. What's the diff?
Do you send mail in secure tamper evident envelopes? Are you sure bad guys don't have a way around that? People were stealing mail from the local PO boxes here. So let's not use mail either. Do you have conversations in public? Did someone plant a mini-wireless camera near your ATM? These are all real, do-able threats, yet, we go on with our lives. I think you are making a mountain of a molehill, but that's just me.
I took care of the google issue for myself.
As far as I am concerned it is not an issue. No need for a proxy server. Simpler than that.
Are you *sure* you took care of this? Hmmmm, maybe Google can peer through ad-blockers? Seriously, if you have so many concerns, I would follow the advice of others - take extreme measures, or get off the internet all together.
On the privacy policy issue, Andy indicate he would put up a privacy policy. Seems reasonable.
Yes, Andy should have a privacy policy, I agree. But what does that accomplish, other than the formality, and a 'feel good' move? Can we 'trust' Andy to abide by it? Can we 'trust' everyone he hires, or everyone that might gain access to our profiles? I don't think so.
Hey, for all we know, Andy is managing this site from some foreign country, out of reach of the strong arm of U.S. law!
http://www.early-retirement.org/forums/f46/andy-r-ar-gen-tee-nah-29160.html
-ERD50