|
|
01-31-2018, 10:19 AM
|
#81
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huston55
The journalist’s Three Take Aways to consider for improving US healthcare were:
1. Universal Coverage
2. Mandatory Sign-Up
3. Standard Pricing
——————
|
Huston,
The issue I have with comparing like this is the scale is not the same. The combined population of those 5 countries doesn't even equal the population of the US. It's not a like for like comparison. I agree our cost per person is way too high, but that doesn't mean something that works in a country that has a fraction of our population will work.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-31-2018, 10:24 AM
|
#82
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,691
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut
The local public hospital near me is pretty good overall, but I have to say that it is definitely a huge monument to over spending. The lobby is multi-storied with a fancy piano and all sort of elegant touches one would expect in a luxury hotel - flower displays, fancy artwork, a grand piano, etc. etc. etc. Granted, I don't want my hospital to look like the inside of a Borg cube, but I have to wonder if this is money well spent.
|
Yup, I'd be curious as to how much is wasted on these extravagances. Hospital administration seems to feel they need to have a shrine in their honor and are definitely not running it like a true for profit business. We all know we are all paying for it in premiums and health costs. There's a happy medium between having a sterile and luxury feel to a hospital, it is after all designed for short term stays and recuperation from procedures. People shouldn't feel like they are better off in a hospital than they are at home.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:26 AM
|
#83
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 18,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptTom
What's needed is a breakthrough; a disruption; a new model.
|
Yes, maybe one without insurance companies and a focus on medical provider cost control/pricing.
__________________
*********Go Astros!*********
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:27 AM
|
#84
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,691
|
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:28 AM
|
#85
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut
The local public hospital near me is pretty good overall, but I have to say that it is definitely a huge monument to over spending. The lobby is multi-storied with a fancy piano and all sort of elegant touches one would expect in a luxury hotel - flower displays, fancy artwork, a grand piano, etc. etc. etc. Granted, I don't want my hospital to look like the inside of a Borg cube, but I have to wonder if this is money well spent.
|
Would you choose that hospital or the one down the street that is 50 years old and has two patients to a room? When people choose the hospital they use and price is not part of the equation, they take the nicest with the latest toys equipment and finest doctors. The grand new hospital is exactly what people will choose. As I noted in an earlier post this is the same thing that has happened in education where the kids are not concerned with costs because the Government has made tuition loans very easy and the kids do not think there is anything wrong with having a mountain of debt upon graduation so they pick the college with the nicest facilities and best teachers.
As an example of this in the healthcare industry, there have been many threads on this board about not using Medicare Advantage because you don't get to choose the finest doctors and finest hospitals.
I think the new hospitals are making the exactly right business decision with the grand appointments and spacious private rooms because that is what people want and those people are not footing their bill. I was one of those that had to pay over $12k/yr/person before Medicare, but that group is a very small minority. BTW, I really don't want the government choosing what medical services I get or don't get.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:28 AM
|
#86
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobandsherry
Subsidy is for workers, not retired. Some retiree's from JPM have subsidized health benefits (depending on when acquired), but JPM did away with providing retirement health benefits many years ago.
|
I meant that they aren't able to get Obamacare subsidies when buying through healthcare.gov- apparently their income is too high.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:33 AM
|
#87
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,583
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aja8888
Yes, maybe one without insurance companies and a focus on medical provider cost control/pricing.
|
Yes, insurance companies are probably not going to be part of whatever ends up being implemented by this new initiative.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:41 AM
|
#88
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,691
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobandsherry
Subsidy is for workers, not retired. Some retiree's from JPM have subsidized health benefits (depending on when acquired), but JPM did away with providing retirement health benefits many years ago.
|
Ah, OK, got it. They may have been able to do better with putting money aside in taxable accounts and living off that until they were old enough for Medicare and then tap into retirement funds. Many people have been tuned that 401K/IRA's are the way to comfortable retirement, which is fine if you plan to work to 65. But for early retirement having ability to tap into taxable accounts and capital gains is a different path that still allows for comfortable living and still getting the subsidies. But that's getting OT.
A/B/J is probably just the tip of the iceberg as to what the future could hold as a real disruption to health care. My wife was in the medical field, if you look at the number of acquisitions and consolidations of practices underway with medical groups, it's telling that they are preparing for a different future.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:45 AM
|
#89
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,108
|
In Oregon a needs assessment and state approval is required to construct a new hospital. I do not know if additions to existing facilities are similarly subject to review. It seems to me that interior appointments is one way hospitals are competing. I wish that every hospital was required to advertise their infection control and similar effectiveness reviews. The problem with cost marketing is that there are so many components to a hospital bill.
To the best of my knowledge no needs assessment is required for expensive equipment and if not there should be.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:46 AM
|
#90
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,078
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
Yes, insurance companies are probably not going to be part of whatever ends up being implemented by this new initiative.
|
+1
They like things the way they are.
I recall a technology guy explaining how he got a bunch of insurance companies to chip in millions for a technology solution that he couldn't deliver. I wanted no part of it, honestly it was so far fetched it should have been criminal. Twenty years later you can't get close to what he promised to deliver.
Complete boondoggle that folks with an understanding of the underlying technologies knew would fail. It did, but he or someone just like him is still out there milking a cash cow.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 11:37 AM
|
#91
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Bay Area
Posts: 2,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brokrken
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huston55
The journalist’s Three Take Aways to consider for improving US healthcare were:
1. Universal Coverage
2. Mandatory Sign-Up
3. Standard Pricing
——————
|
Huston,
The issue I have with comparing like this is the scale is not the same. The combined population of those 5 countries doesn't even equal the population of the US. It's not a like for like comparison. I agree our cost per person is way too high, but that doesn't mean something that works in a country that has a fraction of our population will work.
|
I don’t understand why you think “population” differences make this analysis invalid. It seems to me there are several more relevant factors like:
1. Are they all capitalist economies
2. Are they all democracies
3. Do they provide the individual freedoms that facilitate a person’s choices (ie: healthcare), and so on...
Note that Switzerland (9M) & Taiwan (24M), which both implemented their current successful healthcare systems in the 1990s, evaluated many countries they considered similar (including the USA [325M]) and chose what they thought were the best aspects from each. This proves that we can do the same thing, population differences aside...if we so choose. BTW, the total population of these five countries is 309M, although I don’t think it’s really relevant.
__________________
You may be whatever you resolve to be.
100% x 10% > 10% x 100%
Small pensions & SS cover essentials
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 11:51 AM
|
#92
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Greenville
Posts: 653
|
I will hold off complete judgement, but these guys didn't get to be mega-wealthy by accident. What I see, is some very smart guys that have identified a VERY lucrative area of the economy, that also have the financial ability to overcome the extremely high entry barriers....
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 12:23 PM
|
#93
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SoCal, Lausanne
Posts: 4,408
|
If they are really serious about lowering the cost of healthcare, they need to address:
1- High prescription drug prices (get them in line with prices in Canada and elsewhere)
2- High provider fees (get them in line with the rest of the developed world)
3- Fighting the obesity epidemic (get people into a more healthy lifestyle)
The insurance companies are just passing the high costs to the consumer and employers.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 12:29 PM
|
#94
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,320
|
That is not all the insurance companies are doing.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 07:59 PM
|
#95
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huston55
I don’t understand why you think “population” differences make this analysis invalid. It seems to me there are several more relevant factors like:
1. Are they all capitalist economies
2. Are they all democracies
3. Do they provide the individual freedoms that facilitate a person’s choices (ie: healthcare), and so on...
Note that Switzerland (9M) & Taiwan (24M), which both implemented their current successful healthcare systems in the 1990s, evaluated many countries they considered similar (including the USA [325M]) and chose what they thought were the best aspects from each. This proves that we can do the same thing, population differences aside...if we so choose. BTW, the total population of these five countries is 309M, although I don’t think it’s really relevant.
|
Population absolutely matters. What works for a country of 25 million might not be scalable to a country of 325 million. It's the same reason a successful plant trial sometimes doesn't work in full scale production.
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 08:32 PM
|
#96
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 2,479
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brokrken
Population absolutely matters. What works for a country of 25 million might not be scalable to a country of 325 million. It's the same reason a successful plant trial sometimes doesn't work in full scale production.
|
Agree. Health care in NJ, NY, or CA is never going to cost the same as most of the country. So the "standard pricing" concept is nonsense for a country the size of U.S.A. And I don't know about the others but I do know that the UK is into health care rationing, which is a non-starter in the U.S.
__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged
"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
“There is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” - H.L. Mencken
|
|
|
01-31-2018, 10:41 PM
|
#97
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 7,108
|
I wonder if the consortium would offer a basic plan along the lines of CN, England, maybe Denmark or Norway, for free and and two levels of upgrade at a premium.
I once met a Kaiser med buyer who told me they buy drugs by the pallet. If I were that consortium I would buy a generic drug manufacturer and build on that manufacturer's product line.
The consortium likely won't have the elderly as their insured as they will likely be retired and covered by Medicare A & B. That said, perhaps insured with likely terminal illnesses be required to obtain a second opinion before embarking on treatment not likely to significantly prolong the quality of their life. Hidden behind this thought is that I wonder if some treatments are for the benefit of the health care providers or the patient.
FWIW I wouldn't call Kaiser insurance cheap.
__________________
Duck bjorn.
|
|
|
02-01-2018, 06:37 AM
|
#98
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 2,479
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brat
I wonder if the consortium would offer a basic plan along the lines of CN, England, maybe Denmark or Norway, for free and and two levels of upgrade at a premium.
|
I believe "basic plans" are not allowed under ACA. I wish they were. Remember when health insurance was called Major Medical?
__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged
"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
“There is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” - H.L. Mencken
|
|
|
02-01-2018, 06:42 AM
|
#99
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by USGrant1962
I believe "basic plans" are not allowed under ACA. I wish they were. Remember when health insurance was called Major Medical?
|
"Basic" as in "lacking some required provisions" is not permitted. Perfectly legal, however, to offer more expensive plans with higher reimbursement rates to physicians or a better network.
in the UK, at least 10 years ago (not sure now) companies would buy supplemental health insurance for their executives. My London-based boss told me his son had some kind of issue they wanted checked out and when his wife called the doctor they couldn't get him in for a week, When she mentioned the plan they had, same-day appointments were suddenly available.
|
|
|
02-01-2018, 07:02 AM
|
#100
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,583
|
Part of the announcement highlighted technology.
Quote:
The initial focus of the new company will be on technology solutions that will provide U.S. employees and their families with simplified, high-quality and transparent healthcare at a reasonable cost
|
This is interesting, and possibly one source of disruption. That is, the ability to deliver high quality health care at a much lower price.
Technology in health care has been applied much differently than other industries. It is much more proprietary and directed toward generating revenue for the patent-holder, rather than focused on efficiency and business growth, as seen in other industries. In other words, over a long period it does not enable the provider to provide more service at the same (or lower) cost, but it does enable the provider to generate more revenue, even when there is no compelling evidence of better health outcomes.
The use of knowledge based systems in medicine has great potential, but is critically limited by state regulatory systems designed to preserve and reinforce the traditional role of physician and pharmacist. If this venture can find a way to get around that, the potential is compelling.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|