Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-15-2018, 07:06 PM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
travelover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by USGrant1962 View Post
Yea, better they make no progress...
Sorry, I guess I expect more for such an obvious problem.
travelover is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-15-2018, 09:10 PM   #22
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
USGrant1962's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 2,479
New proposal to required price disclosure in drug ads: https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...=.32447abce7b5
__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged

"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
There is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” - H.L. Mencken
USGrant1962 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 05:20 AM   #23
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
JoeWras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRG View Post
While goodrx has saved me thousands it's not always the cheapest coupon. Retail me not has some meds 50% cheaper than goodrx. Happy searching.
At least now you can ask your pharmacist if this is the cheapest option. People are gonna have to speak up.

One huge problem we have in the USA is just taking what we get from the entire establishment. We have a culture of trusting these highly trained professionals or large hospitals and taking whatever they say as gospel.

I may make some retired medical pros mad when I say this, but we need to push back and ask questions about our care, including cost. I know I did when I got on a high deductible plan.
JoeWras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 07:34 AM   #24
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
MRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeWras View Post
At least now you can ask your pharmacist if this is the cheapest option. People are gonna have to speak up.

One huge problem we have in the USA is just taking what we get from the entire establishment. We have a culture of trusting these highly trained professionals or large hospitals and taking whatever they say as gospel.

I may make some retired medical pros mad when I say this, but we need to push back and ask questions about our care, including cost. I know I did when I got on a high deductible plan.
+1

My PCP and I don't agree about much. I push back and she's not used to that. I want to understand why she tells me certain things and she's not used to someone asking why. I'll be damned if I'm doing something because of vague threats of what happened 50 years ago.
MRG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 09:17 AM   #25
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by USGrant1962 View Post
New proposal to required price disclosure in drug ads: https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...=.32447abce7b5
This seems like a small but very welcome first step. Still, what does "list price" mean if nobody pays it?
What would happen if drug makers had to charge the same thing to every wholesaler/distributor, worldwide? To big pharmacy chains, Canadian pharmacies, the VA, everyone. They charge everyone, say, $2 for every 200mg tablet of Highprofimene. So, US consumers aren't subsidizing others, etc. And, then, this wholesale price would be the price disclosed in all advertising. That will rattle some cages.
I'd normally oppose this intervention in the free market, but there's no sense on pretending we have a free market today.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 09:29 AM   #26
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
This seems like a small but very welcome first step. Still, what does "list price" mean if nobody pays it?
What would happen if drug makers had to charge the same thing to every wholesaler/distributor, worldwide? To big pharmacy chains, Canadian pharmacies, the VA, everyone. They charge everyone, say, $2 for every 200mg tablet of Highprofimene. So, US consumers aren't subsidizing others, etc. And, then, this wholesale price would be the price disclosed in all advertising. That will rattle some cages.
I'd normally oppose this intervention in the free market, but there's no sense on pretending we have a free market today.
Good points. In this case, I think “list price”, even if it is never charged and no one pays it, still may have an impact. It makes the role of intermediaries more difficult, and will potentially allow more light to be cast on rebates and other payments, which usually do not benefit consumers and often exist in a grey, mucky, ethically dubious area.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 09:30 AM   #27
Moderator
sengsational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,656
I'd say before regulation of wholesale price, which would be a complicated set of additional rules, why not remove the rules that prohibit getting rx from outside the US? If removing a stupid rule will work, that beats adding more rules!
sengsational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 09:37 AM   #28
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
Good points. In this case, I think “list price”, even if it is never charged and no one pays it, still may have an impact. It makes the role of intermediaries more difficult, and will potentially allow more light to be cast on rebates and other payments, which usually do not benefit consumers and often exist in a grey, mucky, ethically dubious area.
Plus it may have the potential to dampen some of the drug companies greed exuberant pricing policies once the public responds with an outpouring of "WTF?!!" when they learn what the drug to treat their toenail fungus costs.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:02 AM   #29
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dogpatch
Posts: 561
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational View Post
I'd say before regulation of wholesale price, which would be a complicated set of additional rules, why not remove the rules that prohibit getting rx from outside the US? If removing a stupid rule will work, that beats adding more rules!
That would be very good- I suspect serious lobby $ are working to prevent it.

For the anti-gag rule, I wish they would go further, and require pharmacists to provide price options to patients. Not everyone will know to ask for a lower price.

I found this interesting comment from a pharmacist:

"There are a lot of other games being played I believe by the middlemen and the PBMs that are involved and subcontracted for pharmacy benefits that drive up drug prices and I think this is a good first step to uncovering and shining light on some of those other practices like we've done in our state," Vinson said.
tfudtuckerpucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:12 AM   #30
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational View Post
I'd say before regulation of wholesale price, which would be a complicated set of additional rules, why not remove the rules that prohibit getting rx from outside the US?
That would certainly be simpler. The safety issues have been (ab)used to scuttle this in the past, but I do think there is valid reason for concern. Mr Jones ordering pills from China might be getting almost anything, and he has no effective recourse to prevent fraud. The simplest answer (IMO) is to have retail sales come through a US pharmacy/agent that is legally responsible for what they sell. We need to have somebody that can be fined or jailed if the pharmaceuticals are bogus, adulterated, etc. These pharmacies can buy the drugs wherever they want. It isn't especially difficult or expensive for them to randomly test the pharmaceuticals.

Just a few of these operations would go a long way toward driving down prices.


Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
Plus it may have the potential to dampen some of the drug companies greed exuberant pricing policies once the public responds with an outpouring of "WTF?!!" when they learn what the drug to treat their toenail fungus costs.

I'm wondering how the "pricing disclosure" rule is written. I'm betting the drug companies will do all they can to obfuscate the true prices. For example, if the regulation requires "price per tablet" to be disclosed, expect tablets to get tiny. "Hey, those nail fungus pills are just $1 each, that's not bad." But you need to take a handful at a time for an effective dose.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:15 AM   #31
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
I'm betting the drug companies will do all they can to obfuscate the true prices.
Ya think?
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:22 AM   #32
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ivinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by USGrant1962 View Post
New proposal to required price disclosure in drug ads: https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...=.32447abce7b5

How are they going to do that when every drug and many, many different prices depending on where you obtain it?
ivinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:24 AM   #33
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivinsfan View Post
How are they going to do that when every drug and many, many different prices depending on where you obtain it?
The same way car manufacturers list a "sticker price" for their autos.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Price without in-hand prescription?
Old 10-16-2018, 10:25 AM   #34
Moderator
sengsational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,656
Price without in-hand prescription?

Neither DW nor I have any regular prescriptions, so not much recent experience with rx shopping, but I recall once where I was trying to get a price of something after Walmart pharmacy refused to honor the GoodRX coupon.



So I'm trying to transfer the prescription and nobody I called would tell me the price unless I first transferred the prescription! I don't think the new rules will have an effect on this behavior, will they?
sengsational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:34 AM   #35
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ivinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
The same way car manufacturers list a "sticker price" for their autos.
Well if they do that they will scare away all their potential users with the sticker shock.
ivinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:36 AM   #36
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivinsfan View Post
Well if they do that they will scare away all their potential users with the sticker shock.
Which might create some pressure to hold down the cost of some of these "You want HOW MUCH?!?!!!" drug prices.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:40 AM   #37
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivinsfan View Post
Well if they do that they will scare away all their potential users with the sticker shock.
I think that mechanism is how this works. The pharmacy companies will be incentivized to list a low/reasonable price in their direct-to-consumer advertising so that people aren't scared off. That (in theory) puts downward pressure on prices. Assumptions:

1) Consumers care about the retail list price

2) Consumers can readily get relevant information on alternatives

3 ) The information is presented in a way that they can understand

4) Consumers can/will influence the drugs their medical professionals prescribe (which is probably a good bet, since that's the primary reason the ads exist)


ETA: Ooops, cross-posted with REWahoo!
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:43 AM   #38
Moderator
sengsational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
That would certainly be simpler. The safety issues have been (ab)used to scuttle this in the past, but I do think there is valid reason for concern. Mr Jones ordering pills from China might be getting almost anything, and he has no effective recourse to prevent fraud. The simplest answer (IMO) is to have retail sales come through a US pharmacy/agent that is legally responsible for what they sell. We need to have somebody that can be fined or jailed if the pharmaceuticals are bogus, adulterated, etc. These pharmacies can buy the drugs wherever they want. It isn't especially difficult or expensive for them to randomly test the pharmaceuticals
If I were king of the world, I'd have every legit rx factory in the world cryptographically sign the batch and lot numbers, and put that signature on a qr code in the box. A simple phone app could determine the authenticity of the signature. If the signature proves to be authentic, the only possible conclusion is that the signature was created with the secret private key held at the factory. This is the same crypto we all trust for money purposes, applied to authenticity, but with some supply chain stuff at a central place to prevent replay attacks.
sengsational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:46 AM   #39
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post

ETA: Ooops, cross-posted with REWahoo!
Grape minds drink alike.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 11:25 AM   #40
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational View Post
If I were king of the world, I'd have every legit rx factory in the world cryptographically sign the batch and lot numbers, and put that signature on a qr code in the box. A simple phone app could determine the authenticity of the signature. If the signature proves to be authentic, the only possible conclusion is that the signature was created with the secret private key held at the factory. This is the same crypto we all trust for money purposes, applied to authenticity, but with some supply chain stuff at a central place to prevent replay attacks.
That sounds smart and workable.

I've been surprised at the % of prescription meds that are still dispensed as loose pills, it seems like something out of the '50s. I had assumed it was for space efficiency at the pharmacy, but maybe it is also to (artificially) maintain the need for rock-solid supply chain integrity (with resultant anti-competitive advantages).
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Medicare Prescription Drug Plans? mountainsoft Health and Early Retirement 25 11-20-2017 05:25 AM
Prescription Drug Cards jim584672 Health and Early Retirement 4 03-27-2015 09:10 PM
Prescription Drug Revelation JOHNNIE36 Health and Early Retirement 1 07-20-2011 06:02 PM
Medicare RX Prescription Drug Plans (Part D) modhatter Health and Early Retirement 1 03-22-2007 02:15 PM
Prescription drug plans with medicare modhatter Life after FIRE 2 03-09-2007 06:43 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.