flintnational
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Statin use seems controversial on this forum and in the US in general. However, what many may not know is that the UK is in open war over statin use. Here is an article in yesterday's Daily Mail. The headline sets the tone:
"The deadly propaganda of the statin deniers: The drugs DO protect you from heart attacks but as this devastating investigation reveals thousands are refusing them"
The article targets three doctors that I follow, Dr. Zoe Harcombe PHD, Dr. Malcolm Kendrick MD. and Dr. Asheem Malhotra MD. The Daily Mail calls all three "deniers" and sprinkles the article liberally with the term "fake news". Here is Zoe Harcombe's initial response to the article.
From the Daily Mail piece:
"Last night Health Secretary Matt Hancock voiced his concern about the ‘pernicious lies’ being circulated and added: ‘Statins play a huge role in keeping people at risk of cardiovascular disease healthy. Risking people’s health by spreading reckless and ignorant misinformation claiming otherwise is completely unjustifiable.’"
From Dr. Harcombe's response:
"In the absence of access to the CTSU data, we must rely on the independent assessment of all evidence for the efficacy of statins presented in the form of numbers needed to treat (an absolute measure). This reports that, for primary prevention (the majority), for those taking statins for 5 years, no lives will be saved and between 2 and 15 times as many people will be harmed (muscle damage, type 2 diabetes) as helped (avoiding an event) (Ref 4)."
I am not sure who is winning the war or if the victor will have truth on their side. Your thoughts?
"The deadly propaganda of the statin deniers: The drugs DO protect you from heart attacks but as this devastating investigation reveals thousands are refusing them"
The article targets three doctors that I follow, Dr. Zoe Harcombe PHD, Dr. Malcolm Kendrick MD. and Dr. Asheem Malhotra MD. The Daily Mail calls all three "deniers" and sprinkles the article liberally with the term "fake news". Here is Zoe Harcombe's initial response to the article.
From the Daily Mail piece:
"Last night Health Secretary Matt Hancock voiced his concern about the ‘pernicious lies’ being circulated and added: ‘Statins play a huge role in keeping people at risk of cardiovascular disease healthy. Risking people’s health by spreading reckless and ignorant misinformation claiming otherwise is completely unjustifiable.’"
From Dr. Harcombe's response:
"In the absence of access to the CTSU data, we must rely on the independent assessment of all evidence for the efficacy of statins presented in the form of numbers needed to treat (an absolute measure). This reports that, for primary prevention (the majority), for those taking statins for 5 years, no lives will be saved and between 2 and 15 times as many people will be harmed (muscle damage, type 2 diabetes) as helped (avoiding an event) (Ref 4)."
I am not sure who is winning the war or if the victor will have truth on their side. Your thoughts?