Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Fidelity's "professionally managed" service
Old 09-14-2011, 01:33 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 193
Fidelity's "professionally managed" service

I posted here a few years ago when I sold my business and put a chunk of money into Fidelity's "professional advisory service." : http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...-in-41775.html

I decided to experiment a bit to see if it was worth it.

So, here are the results after three years so far, compared to the indices. I put one bucket of money with Fidelity, one based on a Yahoo "10 best-performing mutual funds" story I read one day in '08, and one a bunch of about 15 stocks from various cable TV blowhards and newspaper columnists:

S&P 500: 49.51%
Fidelity's "professionally managed" stock portfolio, after 1% fee: 49.75%
Yahoo's "best mutual funds" article from 2008 (AMAGX, JMCVX): 49.41%
Internet/TV "expert" stock tips: 54.24%
VFINX 500 index: 47.48%
VTSMX total market index: 50.62%

So is Fidelity worth it?

I really don't know, it all looks the same to me.
Kabekew is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 09-14-2011, 04:48 AM   #2
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 3,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kabekew View Post
So is Fidelity worth it?
Only if you believe it was.

How much would you add in perceived value since you didn't have to make day-to-day investment decisions?

That had to be worth something mentally - but you can't place a dollar value on it.

I've looked at the service, but have not gone with it since it (to me) looked like a program not to beat any index, but remove the ongoing concerns and many decisions for me; something I would recommend that my DW would use after my passing, or inability to continue to monitor/control our joint portfolio (since she has no interest/desire to do so), rather than replace what I'm doing at this time in life.

Just my simple POV.
rescueme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 05:02 AM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 141
Price is only an issue when value is in question.

I love paying extra for certain things in my life because of the perceived value I receive.

Something tells me that as a business owner, you too used a similar approach with your business because you probably realized that it's kinda crazy to try to beat out the competition based solely on price (gotta provide some other services).

So, if you think you are paying extra for a higher return, I would suggest you review your customer agreement (if that is written somewhere, ask them if they will accept an even higher fee ).
TN_INVEST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 05:10 AM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 723
I think the service they provide is worth it if it keeps you on track. However, it's probably nothing you couldn't do yourself, as long as you have the time and inclination to stay on top of things and review your portfolio regularly.
panacea is offline   Reply With Quote
no
Old 09-17-2011, 12:18 PM   #5
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: palm bay , FL
Posts: 121
no

I had Fidelity Professional services, when market was going up, they did fine, when they lost 50% during crash, I had enough. their buy and hold, ride it out mentality was not acceptable. I expected better risk control for that fee. So I would say no, they will follow the market to the bottom if their is another crash.
perrytime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 10:57 PM   #6
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kabekew View Post
S&P 500: 49.51%
Fidelity's "professionally managed" stock portfolio, after 1% fee: 49.75%
Yahoo's "best mutual funds" article from 2008 (AMAGX, JMCVX): 49.41%
Internet/TV "expert" stock tips: 54.24%
VFINX 500 index: 47.48%
VTSMX total market index: 50.62%
So is Fidelity worth it?
I really don't know, it all looks the same to me.
Well, if you can't tell the difference after paying 1% then it's not worth it, right? Otherwise you'd be happy with how much time you'd spent surfing or working on other projects.

In the last month I've talked with two different financial managers about this-- Mark Cortazzo, CEO of Flat Fee Portfolios, and Scott Halliwell of "Ask USAA". Both have all the three-letter acronyms of their profession after their names, and both have worked at a few different types of financial businesses over the last two decades before arriving at their chosen firms. Both are extremely well-versed and articulate on the issues, and they're quite aware that Vanguard & Fidelity have funds that only charge 10-20 basis points for passive management that captures almost all of the market returns.

They're also aware that most active managers don't beat the market, and that asset allocation & low fees make up 90% of an investor's returns.

What they're more aware of, though, is that most investors are idiots. Most investors buy high, sell low, and are generally ruled by their emotions. They don't sign up for their 401(k), they don't DCA, and when the markets get volatile then they abandon their asset allocation plans (actually the "plans" they pulled out of a money magazine or from their brother-in-law) at the pit of the market.

I think that managers like Fidelity (and Cortazzo and Halliwell) exist mainly to offer investors the hand-holding and rudimentary education that they'd never get on their own. They help them figure out what to do and when to do it-- and most importantly, when to do nothing. Their fees of 75-100 basis points help these blissfully clueless customers capture far more of the market return than they'd ever achieve on their own. They're also a lot cheaper than Edward Jones.

So, gosh, I guess active managers really can outperform the "average" investor! That's not a compliment.

I think that by the time an investor has found this board (let alone read a few hundred threads and some of the recommended books) then they don't need active management.

Greaney has also summarized this issue in a recent update:
The 4% Rule for Retirement Withdrawals -- Common Misconceptions

Check out the bar graphs at the end...
__________________
*

Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."

I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 06:09 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
clifp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kabekew View Post

I decided to experiment a bit to see if it was worth it.

So, here are the results after three years so far, compared to the indices. I put one bucket of money with Fidelity, one based on a Yahoo "10 best-performing mutual funds" story I read one day in '08, and one a bunch of about 15 stocks from various cable TV blowhards and newspaper columnists:

S&P 500: 49.51%
Fidelity's "professionally managed" stock portfolio, after 1% fee: 49.75%
Yahoo's "best mutual funds" article from 2008 (AMAGX, JMCVX): 49.41%
Internet/TV "expert" stock tips: 54.24%
VFINX 500 index: 47.48%
VTSMX total market index: 50.62%

So is Fidelity worth it?

I really don't know, it all looks the same to me.
First of all let me commend you for doing an experiment. Most people don't do this. I assume this was with real money not just a paper exercise.

I think Nord's advice is spot on and particularly sage. You've been around the boards long enough that you've learned most of the dumb things not to do. 80% of successful money management in retirement is avoiding doing stupid things with large portions of your assets.

I would point out that rising market makes everybody look pretty good, so that the extent that Fidelity kept you in stocks during a rebound from a Bear Market crash, the 1% was money well spent. If on the other hand you would have kept the money in the market than you didn't need to pay Fidelity.

To me it was foregone conclusion that the Market was going to rise from the Q4 2008/Q1 2009 levels. I actually predicted Dow 12,000 (albeit I predicted the market would rise faster) and we aren't to far from that point. The way forward from here is much cloudier. I would say that odds that we get a further 50% increase in the market over the next 3 years are quite slim. Relatively speaking a 1% fee when the market is going up 15% a year is pretty small. If on the other hand the next 3-5 years brings us returns in the 4-9% range then the 1% will be a pretty significant expense. Greaney bar charts are worth taking a look at although he does discount the possibility that the fees do in fact generate some positive returns.
clifp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 07:11 PM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 702
They are providing a service for the 1% where you need to only have minimal involvement. It is probably not such a bad solution when you reach your senior retirement years and can no longer manage things yourself.
FreeAtLast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 12:25 AM   #9
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeAtLast View Post
They are providing a service for the 1% where you need to only have minimal involvement. It is probably not such a bad solution when you reach your senior retirement years and can no longer manage things yourself.
They're also providing a "service" for the 1% when the market is down...
__________________
*

Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."

I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2011, 05:57 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeAtLast View Post
They are providing a service for the 1% where you need to only have minimal involvement. It is probably not such a bad solution when you reach your senior retirement years and can no longer manage things yourself.
Yes, I can't see going this route anytime soon. But who knows, if I'm lucky enough to make it another 20 years........a program like this might look pretty attractive.
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.