Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
JEPQ: What Am I Missing?
Old 03-29-2023, 02:55 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Qs Laptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,429
JEPQ: What Am I Missing?

I've got a lot of money on the sidelines right now. It's likely the Fed is about done with raising rates, might be another one or two small ones. I'm looking to get aggressive in my IRAs, so I'm looking at NASDAQ stocks. In my research I came across JEPQ, JP Morgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF.

This is an ETF with MSFT, AAPL, GOOG, AMZN, NVDA, and TSLA comprising more than 50% of the fund. Basically, where the Nasdaq goes, the stocks in this fund will be leading it.

The intriguing thing to me is that this fund pays a monthly dividend, last month it was 12% of the share price, annualized. So, if you think the NASDAQ is going to rebound, and in particular if you think these six stocks are going to do well in the ensuing months/years you would be in a good position if you were to buy this fund. However, if it pays a 10% to 12% (annualized) dividend every month? Outstanding, IMO.

Yes, I know the dividend payment has the effect of lowering the share price the next day it is paid out (usually.)

What am I missing?


JEPQ Dividends.png
__________________
"If James Bond was an Amish spy, he would drink buttermilk. Shaken, not churned."
Qs Laptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-29-2023, 03:23 PM   #2
Moderator
braumeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 23,409
It's a brand new ETF, less than a year old, so hard to evaluate.

I do notice that my personal favorite, SCHD, has outperformed it for that time frame.
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 03:55 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,588
You mentioned that you will be getting aggressive in your IRAs - so I'm assuming that you will be holding these in your IRAs? Otherwise, these may generate too much taxable income for you.

I have no idea how the Nasdaq will do over the next five years although hopefully it will go up in the long run. If you buy this I would be prepared for a bumpy ride, reinvest the dividends, and hold it in an IRA.

(If I bought it I would dollar cost average into it.)

Currently, when I'm not off buying something I shouldn't, I am trying to dollar cost average into SCHD & SCHF.
__________________
Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.
MarieIG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 04:06 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Qs Laptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by braumeister View Post
It's a brand new ETF, less than a year old, so hard to evaluate.

I do notice that my personal favorite, SCHD, has outperformed it for that time frame.
Yes, it is a bit new. I need to do more research and look at their turnover rate.

Thanks for mentioning SCHD, very nice choice. I will have to check it out more in depth.
__________________
"If James Bond was an Amish spy, he would drink buttermilk. Shaken, not churned."
Qs Laptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 04:08 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Qs Laptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarieIG View Post
You mentioned that you will be getting aggressive in your IRAs - so I'm assuming that you will be holding these in your IRAs? Otherwise, these may generate too much taxable income for you.
Yes, would be in my IRA's. I realize with that kind of income generation best to have it in a non-taxable account.

Quote:
I have no idea how the Nasdaq will do over the next five years although hopefully it will go up in the long run. If you buy this I would be prepared for a bumpy ride, reinvest the dividends, and hold it in an IRA.
I was thinking of taking the dividends as cash and stick the money into something safer. Reap the rewards and then protect the assets.

Quote:
(If I bought it I would dollar cost average into it.)
Understand.

Quote:
Currently, when I'm not off buying something I shouldn't, I am trying to dollar cost average into SCHD & SCHF.
Again, SCHD looks real good and SCHF looks very good. Thanks.
__________________
"If James Bond was an Amish spy, he would drink buttermilk. Shaken, not churned."
Qs Laptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 04:23 PM   #6
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 209
From what I remember, this ETF sells Calls against stocks that it holds. So most of dividend that it pays, comes from those Call premiums.

Not commenting on the merit of this ETF. Just the mechanics of dividends in this ETF. Don't expect this ETF to perform at same rate as underlying securities (in either direction).
yhoomajor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 08:01 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 25,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by yhoomajor View Post
From what I remember, this ETF sells Calls against stocks that it holds. So most of dividend that it pays, comes from those Call premiums.

Not commenting on the merit of this ETF. Just the mechanics of dividends in this ETF. Don't expect this ETF to perform at same rate as underlying securities (in either direction).
Thanks, I was just looking, and it appears that none of those stocks pays more than ~ 1% div, and several are zero. So where does the "10% to 12% (annualized) dividend" come from? OK, from selling calls, that makes sense. IME, getting a 10~12% premium on a liquid stock means selling calls close to the current price. So very likely giving up growth (a rise in price will have the stock taken from you).

Might be fine, might not, but there's no magic there, just probability and the laws of averages.

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 08:46 PM   #8
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 34,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by yhoomajor View Post
From what I remember, this ETF sells Calls against stocks that it holds. So most of dividend that it pays, comes from those Call premiums.

Not commenting on the merit of this ETF. Just the mechanics of dividends in this ETF. Don't expect this ETF to perform at same rate as underlying securities (in either direction).
I think perhaps you are thinking JEPI, which is slightly more well established (June 2020) and based on the S&P 500... this JEPQ is similiar but based on the NASDAQ and was established in June 2022.

In both cases they invest in the index and sell OTM covered calls to generate income.

Since JEPI started it has returned 11.51% vs 11.79% for SPY, in both cases with dividends reinvested so I don't see the magic.

JEPQ has done worse... since its inception in June 2022 it has returned -5.57% vs -4.19% for QQQ.
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2023, 09:53 PM   #9
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 103
JEPQ generates its income via NASDAQ covered calls and ELN similar to JEPI. If you think NASDAQ is going to start shooting up then you should opt for QQQM not JEPQ because JEPQ's primary purpose is a stream of income, not growth. If you think NASDAQ will be flat or fluctuate then JEPQ would be the better choice.
milford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:49 AM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Qs Laptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
Since JEPI started it has returned 11.51% vs 11.79% for SPY, in both cases with dividends reinvested so I don't see the magic.

JEPQ has done worse... since its inception in June 2022 it has returned -5.57% vs -4.19% for QQQ.
May I ask what tool you are using to get these results?

I found this calculator (I wish it was more customizable) but it shows since JEPQ inception date of 05/05/2022 it has returned -3.83% through 03/24/23.

In the same time frame QQQ has returned -4.14%.

Since 06/01/22:
JEPQ -0.65%
QQQ 1.12%


https://dqydj.com/etf-return-calculator/
__________________
"If James Bond was an Amish spy, he would drink buttermilk. Shaken, not churned."
Qs Laptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:53 AM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Qs Laptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by milford View Post
JEPQ generates its income via NASDAQ covered calls and ELN similar to JEPI. If you think NASDAQ is going to start shooting up then you should opt for QQQM not JEPQ because JEPQ's primary purpose is a stream of income, not growth. If you think NASDAQ will be flat or fluctuate then JEPQ would be the better choice.
Yes, this makes sense. Any reason why you suggest QQQM and not QQQ?
__________________
"If James Bond was an Amish spy, he would drink buttermilk. Shaken, not churned."
Qs Laptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 10:29 AM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
Thanks, I was just looking, and it appears that none of those stocks pays more than ~ 1% div, and several are zero. So where does the "10% to 12% (annualized) dividend" come from? OK, from selling calls, that makes sense. IME, getting a 10~12% premium on a liquid stock means selling calls close to the current price. So very likely giving up growth (a rise in price will have the stock taken from you).

Might be fine, might not, but there's no magic there, just probability and the laws of averages.

-ERD50

Mention covered calls, and I sit right up and start to pay attention. Heh heh heh...

Yes, that's what I have been doing, and mostly on individual stocks and sector ETFs.

I don't go for 10-12% annualized gain from option premium though. The chance of "losing" good stocks via call assignments in a stock surge is too high. When I sell a contract, the premium is usually higher than 12% when annualized, but I don't unconditionally sell all the time, and not on all stocks. Hence, my total return from option selling as computed over the entire accounts is a lot less than 10-12% annualized. This is added icing-on-the-cake return, and is still a lot more than I spend. Hence, I like to do this. Heh heh heh...

In the end, one still has to compare any long-term performance with a buy/hold/rebalance indexing portfolio.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 11:36 AM   #13
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 34,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qs Laptop View Post
May I ask what tool you are using to get these results?

I found this calculator (I wish it was more customizable) but it shows since JEPQ inception date of 05/05/2022 it has returned -3.83% through 03/24/23.

In the same time frame QQQ has returned -4.14%.

Since 06/01/22:
JEPQ -0.65%
QQQ 1.12%


https://dqydj.com/etf-return-calculator/
Portfolio Visualizer...using monthly function... only does whole months.... so June to Feb 2023... will extend to end of March 2023 on Apr 1.
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 12:36 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Qs Laptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
Portfolio Visualizer...using monthly function... only does whole months.... so June to Feb 2023... will extend to end of March 2023 on Apr 1.
Ah yes, thank you. I'm familiar with Portfolio Visualizer.
__________________
"If James Bond was an Amish spy, he would drink buttermilk. Shaken, not churned."
Qs Laptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 01:09 PM   #15
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qs Laptop View Post
Yes, this makes sense. Any reason why you suggest QQQM and not QQQ?
Lower expense ratio. QQQM is for the cost conscious ETF buyer, QQQ is the "brand name" ETF, but they are basically the same product in terms of holdings.
milford is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
$9 billion in missing cash... bright eyed Other topics 7 02-20-2007 05:12 PM
Missing 1099's? cute fuzzy bunny FIRE and Money 21 02-16-2007 06:56 PM
My Plan...what am I missing? cyclone6 FIRE and Money 15 11-13-2006 08:21 PM
My generation: missing the boom years? soupcxan Young Dreamers 64 03-14-2006 05:03 PM
How Firecalc handles missing Treasury data dory36 FIRE and Money 7 12-06-2004 03:00 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.