Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover
One disadvantage of a Target Fund is that if the stock market takes a major dump, you can't just sell bonds to live on while you wait for the recovery.
True, but that amounts to changing your AA...I think the fund managers would essentially be doing that for you as they keep the fund within its target AA range they would sell the bond fund and buy the stock funds.
There is a flip side too... it might avoid you from panicking and selling equities and never getting back in as many people did during the great recession.
But if that is a concern one can obtain more control by just buying the requisite funds in the requisite percentages and rebalance yourself.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
I don't like the AA in the original post... it is way too tilted towards small/mid cap.
Why not keep it simple and go with a target date retirement fund? The Vanguard target date retirement funds are a combination of broad based Vanguard funds... and are what Vanguard recommends for retirees retiring at certain quinquennial years....for example, the 2015 fund is 45/55 and consists of:
Allocation to underlying funds as of 12/31/2016
Ranking by Percentage Fund Percentage
1 Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares* 31.5%
2 Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares 27.0%
3 Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares 18.3%
4 Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Investor Shares 13.3%
5 Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Investor Shares 9.9%
Total — 100.0%
If you want more equities you could instead go with the 2020 fund, which is 57/43.... this keeps it simple... and cheap... the ER of both funds is 0.14%.
If tax efficiency is not a big factor and you are new to fund selection then the target date retirement funds or a balanced fund is another alternative to be considered.
So, does this mean 0.14% on top of the ERs of the underlying funds or, 0.14% TOTAL ER?
__________________ You may be whatever you resolve to be. 100% x 10% > 10% x 100%
Small pensions & SS cover essentials
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
0.14% total and is the weighted average ER of the underlying funds.
Quote:
Annual Fund Operating Expenses
(Expenses that you pay each year as a percentage of the value of your investment)
Management Fees None
12b-1 Distribution Fee None
Other Expenses None
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses 0.13%
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses 0.13%
For some reason, the webpage says 0.14% but the prospectus says 0.13%.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
One disadvantage of a Target Fund is that if the stock market takes a major dump, you can't just sell bonds to live on while you wait for the recovery.
Good point and I agree with this line of thinking. I don't want our investments to be a full time job but I do want to have a bit more control in terms of rebalancing or adjusting our AA as we get a bit older.
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
The OP's AA is very heavy in mid and small caps. He should look at past data to see if he could stomach the volatility in past market meltdowns. Maybe he has always had the same AA, and is used to it.
__________________ "Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
in this enviornment of uncertainty since the election and since bonds and gold sold off we changed strategy .
we went with the golden butterfly so we can profit up or down .
so far it has done very well , and the gold portion is our biggest gainer followed by small cap value .
20% s&p 500 IVV
20% SMALL CAP VALUE SLYV
20% GOLD TLT
20% TLT LONG TREASURY BONDS
20% SHY AND CASH
the long treasury bonds and shy/cash make a bond barbell which has a duration like a intermediate term bond fund but because flight to safety's are based on greed ,fear and perception their ability to soar far more than rates would dictate fly fighter cover for the portfolio .
each component is carefully matched to the other pieces so they perform pretty well as a cohesive unit .
going back to 1972 the butterfly actually surpassed a 60/40 mix in gains , had less losing years and smaller swings through quite a few variations of scenario's ..
Hello, I'm preparing to transfer my 401 upon retirement this year, to an IRA. One of the portfolio options I'm considering is shown below. I wanted to get some feedback and thoughts from the community.
Assumptions:
Portfolio initial balance ~1.3mm
Objective is biased towards captial preservation while allowing an opportunity for growth.
AA is 50/50, rebalanced annually
Investment window is 20-30 years
Annual withdrawal rate would be in the 3-5% range over that period.
Will have a fixed pension that will provide ~30% of the annual budget
SSN will provide ~25% of annual budget
VFIAX: Vanguard 500 Index 10%
VIMAX:Vanguard Mid-Cap Index 20%
VSMAX:Vanguard Sm-Cap Index 20%
VBTLX:Vanguard Total Bond Mkt. Index 50%
Thanks in advance...
After some further considerations I've made the following adjustment to my initial proposed structure.
VFIAX: Vanguard 500 Index 20%
VEXAX:Vanguard Extended Market Index 30%
VBTLX:Vanguard Total Bond Mkt. Index 50%
VEXAX gives me the sm/mid cap exposure that I was looking for with VIMAX and VSMAX while providing a more cost efficient portfolio.
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
as i mentioned above , my feeling is at this point in time i did not just want to bet on prosperity and low rates in ordr to maintain positive returns so i decided to give up some upside in an up market for the ability to have upside in a down market too .
that isn't to say at some point in the future i won't switch back to a more conventional mix but for now we can teeter totter either way just as easily.
being retired i want to tighten up the swings more . as i learn more and more about portfolio construction i am learning you can get the same average returns taking a path with steeper valley's and higher peaks or take a smoother path to even a higher return that may be more direct with tighter draw downs .
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFlish
After some further considerations I've made the following adjustment to my initial proposed structure.
VFIAX: Vanguard 500 Index 20%
VEXAX:Vanguard Extended Market Index 30%
VBTLX:Vanguard Total Bond Mkt. Index 50%
VEXAX gives me the sm/mid cap exposure that I was looking for with VIMAX and VSMAX while providing a more cost efficient portfolio.
New thoughts?
You still have a significant tilt to small/mid caps... the total market is 65% large cap/35% mid/small caps and your proposed AA is 40% large cap/60% mid/small caps. As long as you are doing it with your eyes wide open, then fine... but IMO you are trading more volatility for negligible incremental return.
3, 5 and 10 year charts of $10,000 with dividends reinvested for VTSAX, VFIAX and VEMAX:
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
i did this near the lows on tlt and gld after the election sell off .
the permanent portfolio in my opinion is a miss-match of asset allocations in the real world .
it bets equal amounts of money on scenario's that are anything but equal at playing out . that has hurt it , especially the last 5 years .
the gb is very growth oriented . not only is it 40% in stock but the small cap value 600 index is as volatile as can be . it acts leveraged as it moves two to 3x the s&p 500.
you can't even say the pp is low volatility anymore . imagine if you decided to use it after brexit . by years end you had close to double digit losses buyingthen . just at the time someone inclined to leave equity's for lower volatility would have done so .
i do believe stocks will still be the best performer so the gb is a whole lot more of the balance i want .
You still have a significant tilt to small/mid caps... the total market is 65% large cap/35% mid/small caps and your proposed AA is 40% large cap/60% mid/small caps. As long as you are doing it with your eyes wide open, then fine... but IMO you are trading more volatility for negligible incremental return.
3, 5 and 10 year charts of $10,000 with dividends reinvested for VTSAX, VFIAX and VEMAX:
Don't disagree with your points at all. My curiosity and question is what effect does the bond fund have when it's included in the mix. I used the portfolio backtesting tool at portfolio visualizer to run an analysis between 2001 and 2016 to see not so much the difference in gains/losses but rather the dampening effect, if any, caused by the bond fund allocations. When you change the allocation ratios around you get results that surprised me and ultimately got me to the mix I settled on above.
I'm wondering a few things now...
1. I'm I interpreting the backtest data incorrectly?
2. Does allocating a certain percentage of bonds really dampen equity volatility and if so does it allow you to hold more volatile equities successfully.
3. How the heck do I determine if my risk level aligns with my ability to make my estimated budgets going forward 30 years...
Related question (I'm just curious) - you've got 1.3MM in a tax-deferred 401K account? I may be really dense here, but can I ask at a high level how you were able to accumulate that much - even maxing out annual contributions with a generous corporate match that seems super high value. Was there company stock in there or something that took off?
Related question (I'm just curious) - you've got 1.3MM in a tax-deferred 401K account? I may be really dense here, but can I ask at a high level how you were able to accumulate that much - even maxing out annual contributions with a generous corporate match that seems super high value. Was there company stock in there or something that took off?
The 1.3mm breaks down like this
~470k in an IRA from an old employer 401k
~400k from current employer 401k
~435 from DW's current employer 401k
The two remaining 401's will get transferred to respective IRA's later this year upon retirement.
Nothing special in the funds over our career really. We max'ed our 401's early in our career's and lived a modest lifestyle, no debts, own our home now, this year!!! We generally would review the funds each year and made adjustments based on our very limited knowledge of investments. I think the key was making the max contributions as soon as possible and staying the course over 34 years...
We've got close to two years budgeted expenses in simple savings and if the severance package I'm looking at pays out as planned we'll have the third year in the bag by the end of the year. At 57 we're ready to make the transition.
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBGoode
Related question (I'm just curious) - you've got 1.3MM in a tax-deferred 401K account? I may be really dense here, but can I ask at a high level how you were able to accumulate that much - even maxing out annual contributions with a generous corporate match that seems super high value. Was there company stock in there or something that took off?
Not bragging, but our 401k's are higher than that. No stock options, and only the usual 50% corp matching. Investment choices were the usual ho-hum MFs. And I was too ignorant and conservative to go 100% equity. And my wife retired at 50, and I left megacorp at 40 to strike out on my own, hence no more 401k contributions after those dates. We did always max out the contributions though.
We were fortunate to be working and saving during the great market bull run of 1982-2000. Still kicking myself for not paying attention and being too conservative during that time.
__________________ "Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFlish
I think it has to do with the dates the funds that are compared existed. I think the time frame I had to use was 2001 to present.
Yes. I think it is better to have the additional 15 years of data for your analysis. Meaning, use two funds instead of the completion fund. When you actually decide, it's your option which way to go.