Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2017, 03:11 PM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover View Post
One disadvantage of a Target Fund is that if the stock market takes a major dump, you can't just sell bonds to live on while you wait for the recovery.
True, but that amounts to changing your AA...I think the fund managers would essentially be doing that for you as they keep the fund within its target AA range they would sell the bond fund and buy the stock funds.

There is a flip side too... it might avoid you from panicking and selling equities and never getting back in as many people did during the great recession.

But if that is a concern one can obtain more control by just buying the requisite funds in the requisite percentages and rebalance yourself.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-09-2017, 03:51 PM   #22
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Huston55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Bay Area
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
I don't like the AA in the original post... it is way too tilted towards small/mid cap.

Why not keep it simple and go with a target date retirement fund? The Vanguard target date retirement funds are a combination of broad based Vanguard funds... and are what Vanguard recommends for retirees retiring at certain quinquennial years....for example, the 2015 fund is 45/55 and consists of:

Allocation to underlying funds as of 12/31/2016
Ranking by Percentage Fund Percentage
1 Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares* 31.5%
2 Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares 27.0%
3 Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares 18.3%
4 Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Investor Shares 13.3%
5 Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Investor Shares 9.9%
Total — 100.0%

If you want more equities you could instead go with the 2020 fund, which is 57/43.... this keeps it simple... and cheap... the ER of both funds is 0.14%.

If tax efficiency is not a big factor and you are new to fund selection then the target date retirement funds or a balanced fund is another alternative to be considered.
So, does this mean 0.14% on top of the ERs of the underlying funds or, 0.14% TOTAL ER?
__________________
You may be whatever you resolve to be.
100% x 10% > 10% x 100%
Small pensions & SS cover essentials
Huston55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 03:54 PM   #23
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
0.14% total and is the weighted average ER of the underlying funds.

Quote:
Annual Fund Operating Expenses
(Expenses that you pay each year as a percentage of the value of your investment)
Management Fees None
12b-1 Distribution Fee None
Other Expenses None
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses 0.13%
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses 0.13%
For some reason, the webpage says 0.14% but the prospectus says 0.13%.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 04:31 PM   #24
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelover View Post
One disadvantage of a Target Fund is that if the stock market takes a major dump, you can't just sell bonds to live on while you wait for the recovery.
Good point and I agree with this line of thinking. I don't want our investments to be a full time job but I do want to have a bit more control in terms of rebalancing or adjusting our AA as we get a bit older.
MrFlish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 04:49 PM   #25
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
The OP's AA is very heavy in mid and small caps. He should look at past data to see if he could stomach the volatility in past market meltdowns. Maybe he has always had the same AA, and is used to it.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 05:40 PM   #26
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Lsbcal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,808
The capitalization on Total Stock Market is 72/19/9 LC/MC/SC. Wellington and Wellesley seem to do quite well with large caps.

FWIW, our US split is 48/44/8 but is tilted to value stocks. Midcaps seem to do best (compared to large caps) when first coming out of a recession.
Lsbcal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 04:25 AM   #27
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
in this enviornment of uncertainty since the election and since bonds and gold sold off we changed strategy .

we went with the golden butterfly so we can profit up or down .

so far it has done very well , and the gold portion is our biggest gainer followed by small cap value .

20% s&p 500 IVV
20% SMALL CAP VALUE SLYV
20% GOLD TLT
20% TLT LONG TREASURY BONDS
20% SHY AND CASH

the long treasury bonds and shy/cash make a bond barbell which has a duration like a intermediate term bond fund but because flight to safety's are based on greed ,fear and perception their ability to soar far more than rates would dictate fly fighter cover for the portfolio .

each component is carefully matched to the other pieces so they perform pretty well as a cohesive unit .

going back to 1972 the butterfly actually surpassed a 60/40 mix in gains , had less losing years and smaller swings through quite a few variations of scenario's ..
mathjak107 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 05:10 AM   #28
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFlish View Post
Hello, I'm preparing to transfer my 401 upon retirement this year, to an IRA. One of the portfolio options I'm considering is shown below. I wanted to get some feedback and thoughts from the community.

Assumptions:
Portfolio initial balance ~1.3mm
Objective is biased towards captial preservation while allowing an opportunity for growth.
AA is 50/50, rebalanced annually
Investment window is 20-30 years
Annual withdrawal rate would be in the 3-5% range over that period.
Will have a fixed pension that will provide ~30% of the annual budget
SSN will provide ~25% of annual budget

VFIAX: Vanguard 500 Index 10%
VIMAX:Vanguard Mid-Cap Index 20%
VSMAX:Vanguard Sm-Cap Index 20%
VBTLX:Vanguard Total Bond Mkt. Index 50%

Thanks in advance...

After some further considerations I've made the following adjustment to my initial proposed structure.

VFIAX: Vanguard 500 Index 20%
VEXAX:Vanguard Extended Market Index 30%
VBTLX:Vanguard Total Bond Mkt. Index 50%

VEXAX gives me the sm/mid cap exposure that I was looking for with VIMAX and VSMAX while providing a more cost efficient portfolio.

New thoughts?
MrFlish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 05:12 AM   #29
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
as i mentioned above , my feeling is at this point in time i did not just want to bet on prosperity and low rates in ordr to maintain positive returns so i decided to give up some upside in an up market for the ability to have upside in a down market too .

that isn't to say at some point in the future i won't switch back to a more conventional mix but for now we can teeter totter either way just as easily.

being retired i want to tighten up the swings more . as i learn more and more about portfolio construction i am learning you can get the same average returns taking a path with steeper valley's and higher peaks or take a smoother path to even a higher return that may be more direct with tighter draw downs .
mathjak107 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 06:13 AM   #30
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFlish View Post
After some further considerations I've made the following adjustment to my initial proposed structure.

VFIAX: Vanguard 500 Index 20%
VEXAX:Vanguard Extended Market Index 30%
VBTLX:Vanguard Total Bond Mkt. Index 50%

VEXAX gives me the sm/mid cap exposure that I was looking for with VIMAX and VSMAX while providing a more cost efficient portfolio.

New thoughts?
You still have a significant tilt to small/mid caps... the total market is 65% large cap/35% mid/small caps and your proposed AA is 40% large cap/60% mid/small caps. As long as you are doing it with your eyes wide open, then fine... but IMO you are trading more volatility for negligible incremental return.

3, 5 and 10 year charts of $10,000 with dividends reinvested for VTSAX, VFIAX and VEMAX:

VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares Fund VTSAX chart

VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares Fund VTSAX chart

VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares Fund VTSAX chart
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 09:49 AM   #31
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Huston55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Bay Area
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post

we went with the golden butterfly so we can profit up or down .

so far it has done very well , and the gold portion is our biggest gainer followed by small cap value .

20% s&p 500 IVV
20% SMALL CAP VALUE SLYV
20% GOLD TLT
20% TLT LONG TREASURY BONDS
20% SHY AND CASH
How long have you done this & why'd you choose it versus a Harry Browne "Permanent Portfolio"?

Will you remain in it throughout your retirement horizon?
__________________
You may be whatever you resolve to be.
100% x 10% > 10% x 100%
Small pensions & SS cover essentials
Huston55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 11:24 AM   #32
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
i did this near the lows on tlt and gld after the election sell off .

the permanent portfolio in my opinion is a miss-match of asset allocations in the real world .

it bets equal amounts of money on scenario's that are anything but equal at playing out . that has hurt it , especially the last 5 years .

the gb is very growth oriented . not only is it 40% in stock but the small cap value 600 index is as volatile as can be . it acts leveraged as it moves two to 3x the s&p 500.

you can't even say the pp is low volatility anymore . imagine if you decided to use it after brexit . by years end you had close to double digit losses buyingthen . just at the time someone inclined to leave equity's for lower volatility would have done so .

i do believe stocks will still be the best performer so the gb is a whole lot more of the balance i want .
mathjak107 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 05:40 PM   #33
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
You still have a significant tilt to small/mid caps... the total market is 65% large cap/35% mid/small caps and your proposed AA is 40% large cap/60% mid/small caps. As long as you are doing it with your eyes wide open, then fine... but IMO you are trading more volatility for negligible incremental return.

3, 5 and 10 year charts of $10,000 with dividends reinvested for VTSAX, VFIAX and VEMAX:

VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares Fund VTSAX chart

VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares Fund VTSAX chart

VTSAX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares Fund VTSAX chart
Don't disagree with your points at all. My curiosity and question is what effect does the bond fund have when it's included in the mix. I used the portfolio backtesting tool at portfolio visualizer to run an analysis between 2001 and 2016 to see not so much the difference in gains/losses but rather the dampening effect, if any, caused by the bond fund allocations. When you change the allocation ratios around you get results that surprised me and ultimately got me to the mix I settled on above.

I'm wondering a few things now...
1. I'm I interpreting the backtest data incorrectly?
2. Does allocating a certain percentage of bonds really dampen equity volatility and if so does it allow you to hold more volatile equities successfully.
3. How the heck do I determine if my risk level aligns with my ability to make my estimated budgets going forward 30 years...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (255.5 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (227.3 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (313.0 KB, 20 views)
MrFlish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 05:49 PM   #34
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 54
Here's the data showing the 3 different allocations...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (263.7 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (216.7 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (420.5 KB, 20 views)
MrFlish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 06:05 PM   #35
Recycles dryer sheets
JohnnyBGoode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 187
Related question (I'm just curious) - you've got 1.3MM in a tax-deferred 401K account? I may be really dense here, but can I ask at a high level how you were able to accumulate that much - even maxing out annual contributions with a generous corporate match that seems super high value. Was there company stock in there or something that took off?
JohnnyBGoode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 07:37 PM   #36
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBGoode View Post
Related question (I'm just curious) - you've got 1.3MM in a tax-deferred 401K account? I may be really dense here, but can I ask at a high level how you were able to accumulate that much - even maxing out annual contributions with a generous corporate match that seems super high value. Was there company stock in there or something that took off?
The 1.3mm breaks down like this

~470k in an IRA from an old employer 401k
~400k from current employer 401k
~435 from DW's current employer 401k

The two remaining 401's will get transferred to respective IRA's later this year upon retirement.

Nothing special in the funds over our career really. We max'ed our 401's early in our career's and lived a modest lifestyle, no debts, own our home now, this year!!! We generally would review the funds each year and made adjustments based on our very limited knowledge of investments. I think the key was making the max contributions as soon as possible and staying the course over 34 years...

We've got close to two years budgeted expenses in simple savings and if the severance package I'm looking at pays out as planned we'll have the third year in the bag by the end of the year. At 57 we're ready to make the transition.
MrFlish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 09:43 PM   #37
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBGoode View Post
Related question (I'm just curious) - you've got 1.3MM in a tax-deferred 401K account? I may be really dense here, but can I ask at a high level how you were able to accumulate that much - even maxing out annual contributions with a generous corporate match that seems super high value. Was there company stock in there or something that took off?
Not bragging, but our 401k's are higher than that. No stock options, and only the usual 50% corp matching. Investment choices were the usual ho-hum MFs. And I was too ignorant and conservative to go 100% equity. And my wife retired at 50, and I left megacorp at 40 to strike out on my own, hence no more 401k contributions after those dates. We did always max out the contributions though.

We were fortunate to be working and saving during the great market bull run of 1982-2000. Still kicking myself for not paying attention and being too conservative during that time.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2017, 04:18 AM   #38
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
target2019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,684
I've noticed that using VEXAX with the analyzer has the effect of limiting the data. 1985 through 2000 is not used.
target2019 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2017, 05:16 PM   #39
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by target2019 View Post
I've noticed that using VEXAX with the analyzer has the effect of limiting the data. 1985 through 2000 is not used.
I think it has to do with the dates the funds that are compared existed. I think the time frame I had to use was 2001 to present.
MrFlish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2017, 04:01 PM   #40
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
target2019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFlish View Post
I think it has to do with the dates the funds that are compared existed. I think the time frame I had to use was 2001 to present.
Yes. I think it is better to have the additional 15 years of data for your analysis. Meaning, use two funds instead of the completion fund. When you actually decide, it's your option which way to go.
target2019 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thoughts on this portfolio LRAO FIRE and Money 10 01-30-2009 03:50 PM
Thoughts on improving a lazy ETF portfolio FinanceGeek FIRE and Money 12 08-14-2007 03:20 PM
High Dividend Portfolio vs Portfolio Diversified Across Asset Classes ScaredtoQuit FIRE and Money 36 01-12-2007 12:24 PM
ER Worries My personal Dilemma. Any Thoughts? ShokWaveRider FIRE and Money 22 10-24-2004 07:55 PM
Your Thoughts Bozo Hi, I am... 11 09-19-2004 03:57 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.