Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Preferred Stock Investing-The Good , The Bad and The In Between 2015 - 2020
Old 05-28-2015, 06:44 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Golden sunsets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,518
Preferred Stock Investing-The Good , The Bad and The In Between 2015 - 2020

It's rather brazen of me to start a string on something I know very little about, but at least a few of us seem interested and a few of us have ventured into this type of investing. I for one would love to see the topic vetted and I'd like to know a little more on the ins and outs of preferred stock investing.

For example:

Do you stay away from issues that are not cumulative preferred?
What sources beyond Quantum on Line are good to research issues?
How do you find out which issues are "fenced in"?
What are the mechanics of the purchase/sale process when an issue is thinly traded? (If I were to place a limit order how does a potential seller become aware of my bid?)
What general Due Dilligence do you perform?

Thanks in advance for sharing.
__________________
"Luck favors the prepared mind"
Pasteur
Golden sunsets is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-28-2015, 06:48 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Golden sunsets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,518
I just thought of another question. I could be wrong but it seemed to me that there is a wide discrepancy between yields on various issues from the same issuer and issuers with similar ratings. I would have thought that all Preferred's from the same issuer would have similar yields.
__________________
"Luck favors the prepared mind"
Pasteur
Golden sunsets is offline  
Old 05-28-2015, 08:37 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden sunsets View Post
It's rather brazen of me to start a string on something I know very little about, but at least a few of us seem interested and a few of us have ventured into this type of investing. I for one would love to see the topic vetted and I'd like to know a little more on the ins and outs of preferred stock investing.

For example:

Do you stay away from issues that are not cumulative preferred?
What sources beyond Quantum on Line are good to research issues?
How do you find out which issues are "fenced in"?
What are the mechanics of the purchase/sale process when an issue is thinly traded? (If I were to place a limit order how does a potential seller become aware of my bid?)
What general Due Dilligence do you perform?

Thanks in advance for sharing.

I will play Golden while drinking my morning Joe. 1) At first, I was very insistent on looking for cummulatives, but have relaxed that a bit now. Many good preferred issues today are non cumulative including the banks. Cumulative only is meaningful if it is a good company and wont go bankrupt anyways. Besides they just cant say "screw you we decided not to pay". A quality non cumulative is way better than an iffy cumulative issued company.
2) Im not a crack auditor, but I do look at the annual financial reports and filings. But to be honest this is why I stick close to electric utilities as their model is easy to understand, along with wide moat, guaranteed rate of return on equity, etc.
3) The "fenced in part" I just get from online researching of company. Annual reports will also mention certain clues in their such as max debt/equity allowed so the acquiring companies cant load them up with debt. Since these buyouts occur frequently and approval is needed for the consummation, I wouldn't be surprised if most have those protections to protect local citizens electricity safety/reliability.
4) https://eresearch.fidelity.com/erese...mbols=WFC%2FPL
Link above under "detailed quote" section gives current best bid, best ask price. A lot of "Oz behind the curtain" thing goes on I don't quite frankly understand. You can always raise your bid later. Believe me they find the bid. Some leave the bid in que for months hoping to snag a good deal. Google stock history of symbol. CNBC has a good app that shows 20 year plus history of the price and dividend.
Other due diligence includes reading the local paper and make sure they got their latest rate increase and see what Moodys are rating the bonds. Common stockholders need growing earnings for appreciation..Preferred stockholders just need stagnant earnings. Preferreds in utilities generally are only 1-2% of capital structure so earnings of company cover the dividend of Preferreds many, many times over.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline  
Preferred Stock Investing-The Good , The Bad and The In Between
Old 05-28-2015, 08:48 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Preferred Stock Investing-The Good , The Bad and The In Between

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden sunsets View Post
I just thought of another question. I could be wrong but it seemed to me that there is a wide discrepancy between yields on various issues from the same issuer and issuers with similar ratings. I would have thought that all Preferred's from the same issuer would have similar yields.

Most of the current era issues of preferreds from various company's do tend to track closely together. Electrical utilities there can be wide yeild differences. My best guess.... The preferreds of one company were issued in different allotment in different decades. The 1940s and 50s issued Preferreds generally are lower as interest rates were alot lower. The 60s one and on have higher rates. Many have been called. If a past call 6% yield utility stock price rose to lower the effective yield, it would expose someone to a huge call loss. Now it works the opposite for the 40s and 50s issues. If price of those dropped to increase effective yield, it would be so far below par price that if it was called you would make a capital gains killing on it.
Generally the older the issues, the more the protections. I wouldnt get to worried about which preferred has priority (though you can read it in the prospectus) in payment as we are dealing with a tiny sliver of the captial structure to begin with.
Now with those shipping stock preferreds and gas/oil I would damn well want to know, but Im not smart enough to catch the "gotchas" so I just stay away.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 08:10 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 2,650
Just wanted to encourage Mulligan (and others with knowledge) - thanks for sharing!
Totoro is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 10:59 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Golden sunsets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,518
Thanks Mulligan for your thoughtful reply. I'm attaching a pdf of Merrill Lynch's current Preferred Letter. I haven't digested all of it yet, other than to notice that the Yield to Worst on most of the issues is less than the 6-6.5% that you look for.

I also wonder about the selection criteria used of UW-30% or better. Wouldn't that mean that the screen they use requires that analysts ratings be that the stock of the issuer is underweight 30% or more? I don't quite understand that.

Hmmm - tried to attach a pdf but although it shows uploaded it doesn't show up in the post. Oh well!!!
Golden sunsets is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 01:32 PM   #7
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden sunsets View Post
Thanks Mulligan for your thoughtful reply. I'm attaching a pdf of Merrill Lynch's current Preferred Letter. I haven't digested all of it yet, other than to notice that the Yield to Worst on most of the issues is less than the 6-6.5% that you look for.
That surprises me because Index Fund PFF has 6% plus yield.

I do not own Preferred Stocks but if I did I would do it via PFF just as I would stay away from individual stocks and instead buy Index Fund. Then you do not need answers to your questions and you are likely to make better return then picking individual securities.

Time to buy PFF may not be good unless you believe that rates will not go up. PFF will suffer just like long term bonds once rates start going up.
eta2020 is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 02:28 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Golden sunsets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,518
Right - I have purchased PFF for my Mom's account which I manage. As Mulligan puts it, he owns individual issues to avoid the expense ratio and also is not interested in whether the price fluctuates (unless it is due to credit risk I assume) but is using/or will use at some point the dividends to fund his expenses. He never intends to sell them but to add to his positions and grow the dividends over time. I am considering investing a small portion of our portfolio in preferreds, that would not be part of the core of our fixed income but add a little juice to our overall fixed income return.
Golden sunsets is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 02:47 PM   #9
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,248
I think you would have to be way above average investor if you want to buy individual securities.

I learned over my lifetime that nice index fund combined with discipline will outperform even professional money managers. So buying PFF would be the way to go. Forget about individual securities.
eta2020 is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 03:24 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by eta2020 View Post
I think you would have to be way above average investor if you want to buy individual securities.

I learned over my lifetime that nice index fund combined with discipline will outperform even professional money managers. So buying PFF would be the way to go. Forget about individual securities.

Yes and No.... I cant fault your reasoning and if no one has interest in researching at all I agree..But preferreds are a bit different than trying to pick winning stocks. Winning stocks usually need some type of growth in earnings. Preferred stocks don't. Remember they get fed before the commoners do. They just need a small sliver of earnings to maintain payout due to the small amount of capital structure they have. PFF does give you diversity in companies, but not in sector as its about 80% financial. Of course 80% of my purchases are electrical utilities which are way easier to understand.
As I think though, I am actually in more agreement with you than I thought. There are many many preferreds I do not understand so I stay completely away from them. But if you do have interest in researching and stick with safety and away from certain areas such as shipping and gas/oil exploration it isn't real complicated to find good individual company preferreds.
If a person wanted true diversity in sectors they would have to go out an purchase individual ones as PFF is not sector diversified. PFXF is a little different animal and adds diversity, but it stretches what a definition of preferred is. A person could allocate a certain percentage to PFXF and PFF for some sector diversity.
My father decided to go that way 50/50 FWIW. He also fully understands these could and will drop if rates rise. But he is interested only in income now.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 03:32 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden sunsets View Post
Thanks Mulligan for your thoughtful reply. I'm attaching a pdf of Merrill Lynch's current Preferred Letter. I haven't digested all of it yet, other than to notice that the Yield to Worst on most of the issues is less than the 6-6.5% that you look for.

I also wonder about the selection criteria used of UW-30% or better. Wouldn't that mean that the screen they use requires that analysts ratings be that the stock of the issuer is underweight 30% or more? I don't quite understand that.

Hmmm - tried to attach a pdf but although it shows uploaded it doesn't show up in the post. Oh well!!!

Yield to worst can be misleading. I bought one that was minus 20% YTC, but it wasn't really negative at all as dividend was already declared but not released yet. That alone made it positive even with an immediate 30 day call which did not happen and still hasn't. Something to be aware of though.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 03:32 PM   #12
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan View Post
Yes and No....
So how much yield do you get on your portfolio of Preferred stocks?
eta2020 is offline  
Web site that discusses and highlights preferreds
Old 05-29-2015, 07:27 PM   #13
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 259
Web site that discusses and highlights preferreds

Not sure if anyone is interested, however here is a web site that I have used to find preferreds with qualified distributions. Also discusses other income ideas on other tabs.

Preferred Stocks with Qualified Distributions | The Yield Hunter
LiveBelowMeans is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 08:37 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
MooreBonds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan View Post
1) At first, I was very insistent on looking for cummulatives, but have relaxed that a bit now. Many good preferred issues today are non cumulative including the banks. Cumulative only is meaningful if it is a good company and wont go bankrupt anyways. Besides they just cant say "screw you we decided not to pay". A quality non cumulative is way better than an iffy cumulative issued company.
If your universe is limited to utilities and banks, then this could be a valid approach. However, for those of us that reach for some more yield with the accompanying risk, I only stick with cumulative issues. Yeah, it's not THAT likely that we would see another 2009 crash....but many issues did halt the dividend (even some banks). So having to go without any dividend for a year or two can impact your yield over a long holding period. I'd rather have the safety knowing it will accrue if things get nasty for a while.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan View Post
So how much yield do you get on your portfolio of Preferred stocks?
Because I do some nose-holding and reaching among those who are less than top-notch preferreds, my yields are a bit higher. Current average among all preferreds is 8.1% among current values and those paying (or 7.8% if you include the preferreds that have gone belly-up over the past 5-6 years, mostly finance-related ones in the financial crisis). But that includes some bank preferreds that are relatively "safe" yet yield 7%-8%+. So not all high yielding is junk. (and not all junk is high yielding....)
__________________
Dryer sheets Schmyer sheets
MooreBonds is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 11:03 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by eta2020 View Post
So how much yield do you get on your portfolio of Preferred stocks?

Averaging them all together I would say around 6.6%My electrical ones probably average 6.3%. As previously noted, the electrical ones show very little movement in relation to others. In the past for example people were paying $51 for CNLPL when treasury was over 4% and is now just $2 higher with a 2% and change treasury. I have added a few "yield spicers", but not that dangerous. Many view CHSCL as investment grade without the official rating, and I along with a few others here got close to 7.5% this winter. I should have backed up the truck!
Since Moorebonds chimed in I have to personally thank him for steering me this way and showing me the ropes. Though more aggressive than I, he also diversifies better for the risk.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline  
Old 05-29-2015, 11:18 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden sunsets View Post
Thanks Mulligan for your thoughtful reply. I'm attaching a pdf of Merrill Lynch's current Preferred Letter. I haven't digested all of it yet, other than to notice that the Yield to Worst on most of the issues is less than the 6-6.5% that you look for.

I also wonder about the selection criteria used of UW-30% or better. Wouldn't that mean that the screen they use requires that analysts ratings be that the stock of the issuer is underweight 30% or more? I don't quite understand that.

Hmmm - tried to attach a pdf but although it shows uploaded it doesn't show up in the post. Oh well!!!

Golden I reread post and will finish my thoughts on your yield to worst. First of all it is something to be aware of. I read on another forum some idiots had bid up a preferred to $37 and it was called at $25. People who bought above $30 took a nice A$$ whopping! What brain dead people would do that?
But.... YTW is also just an assumption that it will be called. I have one that has been callable since the 1970s so YTW doesn't always mean it will happen. Some high rate preferreds have to be assumed they will be called. But if you buy less than one declared dividend above par you cant be hurt by a call.
If some are several dollars above par, but aren't callable for 10 years it MAY still make since to buy the yield and take the small haircut 10 years down the road on a call if it would happen.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline  
Preferred Stock Investing-The Good , The Bad and The In Between
Old 05-29-2015, 11:27 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Preferred Stock Investing-The Good , The Bad and The In Between

Quote:
Originally Posted by eta2020 View Post
I think you would have to be way above average investor if you want to buy individual securities.

I learned over my lifetime that nice index fund combined with discipline will outperform even professional money managers. So buying PFF would be the way to go. Forget about individual securities.

Eta, in case you are curious an author on preferreds Doug K Le Du wrote this in an article in Seeking Alpha about buying preferreds in ETF's.


Author’s reply » I am not a fan of preferred ETFs for three reasons.

(1) The objective of the ETF fund manager is to change the composition of the fund such that the market price of the fund moves in a way that matches an index. The objective of the income investor, on the other hand, is to earn relatively safe and reliable dividend income. In other words, the objectives of the fund management have absolutely no relationship to the objectives of those buying shares.

(2) In order to achieve their index-matching objective, fund managers include speculative grade securities within the mix of the fund. While such securities provide the fund manager with an excellent tool for manipulating the price of fund shares in order to match the target index, risk-averse investors are exposed to the risks of securities that they would otherwise be very unlikely to purchase on their own.

(3) The ETF model was invented by Wall Street to allow individual investors who are not experts in an industry segment or a commodity with a way of investing in that segment or commodity. Preferred stocks are neither an industry segment nor a commodity; they are a type of equity security (hence problems #1 and #2 above).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Mulligan is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 04:12 AM   #18
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan View Post
Averaging them all together I would say around 6.6%My electrical ones probably average 6.3%. As previously noted, the electrical ones show very little movement in relation to others. In the past for example people were paying $51 for CNLPL when treasury was over 4% and is now just $2 higher with a 2% and change treasury. I have added a few "yield spicers", but not that dangerous. Many view CHSCL as investment grade without the official rating, and I along with a few others here got close to 7.5% this winter. I should have backed up the truck!
Since Moorebonds chimed in I have to personally thank him for steering me this way and showing me the ropes. Though more aggressive than I, he also diversifies better for the risk.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So you get 6.5 yield versus PFF ETF 6.05. That is noticeable difference, but I am not sure I would be willing to do my own work to get this difference versus getting ETF.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan View Post

(1) The objective of the ETF fund manager is to change the composition of the fund such that the market price of the fund moves in a way that matches an index. The objective of the income investor, on the other hand, is to earn relatively safe and reliable dividend income. In other words, the objectives of the fund management have absolutely no relationship to the objectives of those buying shares.

(2) In order to achieve their index-matching objective, fund managers include speculative grade securities within the mix of the fund. While such securities provide the fund manager with an excellent tool for manipulating the price of fund shares in order to match the target index, risk-averse investors are exposed to the risks of securities that they would otherwise be very unlikely to purchase on their own.
So you are telling me PFF is not tracking S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index but it buys some other securities? I did not carefully review their prospectus but that looks odd to me.
eta2020 is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 06:05 AM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: The Great Wide Open
Posts: 3,779
I have been investing in preferred stocks for over 10 years and been extremely pleased with an 8+% return over the years. I considered my preferreds as part of MY fixed income portfolio and the individual stocks as mini-bonds.


I purchase individual preferreds that are priced below par, banks, REITS, industrials, and utilities,( and have considered energy stocks but never pulled the trigger, more on this later.)


I purchase no more than $5,000 of each issue, most I purchase in the $22-23 area and purchase 200 shares to diversify.


As with bonds, some issues fluctuate greatly around the ex-dividend date, or with bonds the date interest is paid.


I also own PGX and PFF, both preferred ETFs, but the PFF has been a laggard as compared to the rest of my preferred portfolio.


When I FIRED in October 14, I took $100K in a Rollover acct. and purchased over 20 issues using the methodology described above, it is now at $107K.

I recently had a 5.05% utility preferred called, paid $22.21 per share 9 years ago, picked up all the divvies along the way, and got $25 per share for being patient .



I have only been burned twice in the preferred arena and those issues were purchased in my SPECULATION portion of my portfolio. I had purchased some GM and some Freddie Mac shares at about $8.00 and $12.00 before the Great Recession. I received some nice divvies for a while but lost it all when the bankruptcies occurred. Never thought that the GM pensioners would move ahead of me in the succession line and the Freddie Mac issue is still not resolved. Someone is still accumulating those shares for pennies the last time I looked.
Winemaker is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 06:31 AM   #20
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winemaker View Post

I also own PGX and PFF, both preferred ETFs, but the PFF has been a laggard as compared to the rest of my preferred portfolio.
For educational purpose can you tell us is the yield taxed at reduced rate just like with regular equities or is some of this taxed at higher income rate (like CDs or Bonds)
eta2020 is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.