Buying deep in the money covered calls on dividend stocks is not a strategy I've used before. Concept is interesting, so with a few bucks sitting idle I decided to use a portion to test the strategy.
I bought PFE, VZ and then a wild card AGNC (since it has monthly dividend) with short term 1/21/22 expiration.
PFE: $20 Strike / $48.02 Purchase / $28.07 Premium / $19.94 Net = 9.5% XIRR
VZ: $35 Strike / $55.15 Purchase / $20.19 Premium / $34.95 Net = 8.5% XIRR
AGNC: $5 Strike / $16.15 Purchase / $11.12 Premium / $5.03 Net = 28.9% XIRR
I went as deep as long as net was below strike (AGNC was as close as I could get). I'm expecting assignment as Ex-Div date comes around, but worse case I make a couple bucks. Best case I make a decent return on short-term cash.
I can't think of a good reason to buy a deep in the money long call except to gain big. So whoever shouldn't cash in too quickly. hmm...
From what I am reading that is the risk... that the call gets exercised just before the ex-dividend date so you don't end up receiving the dividend... you have a minor gain or loss for the difference between the net debit and the strike.
But my plan is to sell really long deep-in-the-money calls... Jan 2023... and what I am trying to get my head around to is why someone would buy a long deep-in-the-money call if they plan to exercise it within a month of so to get the dividend... if they want the dividend they can just buy the stock for what they pay out for the call plus the strike.
Except for some of us "income oriented" people, most option players are in the game to trade just the options.
I am guessing that the recent activity of using puts and calls by people like us (retirees) for income is a result of having no other low risk real income-producing alternatives (CD's gone, bond yields very low, etc).
True, but I think the real option traders tend to focus on shorter term options... quite candidly, I don't see the play/benefit to the buyer of a long term call where the premium approximates the current price less the strike, but there must be some play because they do trade.
Poor man's covered call uses deep in the money leaps.True, but I think the real option traders tend to focus on shorter term options... quite candidly, I don't see the play/benefit to the buyer of a long term call where the premium approximates the current price less the strike, but there must be some play because they do trade.
There is also a risk that dividend gets cut or suspended. Looking at past dividend payment history and available free cash flow are a couple good data points to also consider.From what I am reading that is the risk... that the call gets exercised just before the ex-dividend date so you don't end up receiving the dividend... you have a minor gain or loss for the difference between the net debit and the strike.
But my plan is to sell really long deep-in-the-money calls... Jan 2023... and what I am trying to get my head around to is why someone would buy a long deep-in-the-money call if they plan to exercise it within a month of so to get the dividend... if they want the dividend they can just buy the stock for what they pay out for the call plus the strike.
I can't think of a good reason to buy a deep in the money long call except to gain big. So whoever shouldn't cash in too quickly. hmm...
I am guessing that the recent activity of using puts and calls by people like us (retirees) for income is a result of having no other low risk real income-producing alternatives (CD's gone, bond yields very low, etc).
"Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth...philosopher Mike Tyson"
quite candidly, I don't see the play/benefit to the buyer of a long term call where the premium approximates the current price less the strike, but there must be some play because they do trade.
All of my sales were in a taxable account, so I have a couple questions (all refer to CC, but i assume it's similar when SP)..
- are the premiums realized when I sell the contract OR when the contract expires or is assigned?
- are taxes on premiums treated as CG? then ST or LT based on how long you held the contract?
- if I was in a trade and my underlying was called, would that gain/loss be taxed based on my lots FIFO? or based on the length of the contract? or is it automatically STCG?
Agree. All my "trades" are done in IRAs as well and I have only a small amount each year.I would not be able to write more than 2,000 contracts each year, if I had not done it on IRA accounts. The tax reporting would have driven me insane.
I would not be able to write more than 2,000 contracts each year, if I had not done it on IRA accounts. The tax reporting would have driven me insane.
Curious, why you didn't just buy the Call back instead of buying stock.A long time ago, I sold some covered calls far out of the money, in a taxable account...
Sure enough the stock went up a LOT and they were going to be called
Since I didn't want to take the tax hit, I had to scramble to find $70K in the couch cushions to buy a bunch of that stock.
I changed my stock order to LIFO so the new stock would be taken and I'd have low capital gains.
Taught me a lesson to be very careful in my taxable account with this stuff..
Curious, why you didn't just buy the Call back instead of buying stock.
Gain is realized when you close out the option by buying it back (this may be a loss), or when the contract expires worthless.
The option premium is always short-term capital gain/loss, even if it is held for longer than 1 year (LEAP options).
If an OTM call is assigned and the stock is sold, the option premium is added to the gain on the stock, and this capital gain is either short-term or long-term depending on when the stock was purchased. If you have more than 1 lot of stock, and the lots were bought at different dates, I don't know how the brokerage determines which lot gets sold due to the contract. You need to talk with your broker.
For ITM calls, it's more complicated. Having an ITM call on a stock may also affect tax treatment of the dividend of the stock.
For more info, see: https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products/options/tax-implications-covered-calls.
I would not be able to write more than 2,000 contracts each year, if I had not done it on IRA accounts. The tax reporting would have driven me insane.
Not really a problem. My broker reports the option activity and provides file to import. Simply import into my tax program and it's done.
It was very early in my experience with options, so I didn't know how..
The funny part is on the last day , the stock dropped a little and so I ended up without the stock being called, and since I liked the stock, I left the new money in it.
Curious, why you didn't just buy the Call back instead of buying stock.
Hi @bobandsherry -
I am still wrapping my head around process of writing CC's, and I understand the concept of writing a CC to collect the premium - with the understanding that downside has unlimited risk and upside is capped by the strike.
Can you lay out an example of buying a call back? Would you typically do this if you wrote it OTM and it moved ITM at/prior to expiry?
Unlimited risk is only with naked calls. Because you hold the underlying stock, your risk is not higher than that of the stock holder who does not sell options.
The worst case is that the stock goes to 0. A buy-and-holder loses it all. You on the other hand has a little cash left from selling the option.