Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Coming Generational Showdown
Old 12-12-2017, 08:38 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 428
Coming Generational Showdown

A good read on how SS has grown beyond it's design and will become a future burden:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ildren/548117/

“Fifty years ago, the government spent $3 on public investments that spur economic activity for every $1 it spent on entitlements. Today, that ratio has flipped, and within a decade the government will be putting $5 into entitlements for every $1 that goes into roads, education, scientific research, and the like.” By the time all the Boomers retire, programs to pay for them—plus interest on the national debt they’ve run up in the meantime—will consume more than 90 cents of every federal dollar."
Tekward is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-12-2017, 09:16 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
USGrant1962's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 2,479
That article was pretty nonsensical. First the author rants about reigning in entitlements, then he rants about millennials paying for entitlements. The author has no solutions, but got paid for an article.
__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged

"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
There is always a well-known solution to every human problem: neat, plausible, and wrong.” - H.L. Mencken
USGrant1962 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 09:18 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,008
I thought a book by that title had been published around a decade ago.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 09:29 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
Another article explaining SS and other entitlements are Paygo programs despite the smoke and mirrors. Though there may still be many, anyone who still insists they’re just getting back what they paid in is willfully ignorant. The only “fair” solution is generationally shared sacrifice, with some tweaks for transition.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 09:54 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Amethyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,598
Willful and vehement ignorance. The overlap with the "Don't you dare call my entitlement program an 'entitlement!' set is pretty broad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
anyone who still insists they’re just getting back what they paid in is willfully ignorant..
__________________
If you understood everything I say, you'd be me ~ Miles Davis
'There is only one success – to be able to spend your life in your own way.’ Christopher Morley.
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day.
Amethyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 10:46 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
gayl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Diablo Valley (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 2,705
I've often stated that we need to raise FRA to 70, keep early RA at 62 but obviously diminished, remove contribution limit (currently 118k?) while capping payout at whatever max is now. Everyone has the option of putting aside something if they wish to retire b4 FRA. And yes, DD can only afford 5% whereas 10% isn't a struggle for DS. But 5% > 0%

Also let's uncouple SSI / SSDI from SSA.
gayl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 11:01 AM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Red Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Hog Mountian
Posts: 2,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by gayl View Post
I've often stated that we need to raise FRA to 70, keep early RA at 62 but obviously diminished, remove contribution limit (currently 118k?) while capping payout at whatever max is now. Everyone has the option of putting aside something if they wish to retire b4 FRA. And yes, DD can only afford 5% whereas 10% isn't a struggle for DS. But 5% > 0%

Also let's uncouple SSI / SSDI from SSA.
+1. I would also support raising RA for those entering workforce today (who will most likely see an average life expectancy well beyond 100 years). Perhaps linking RA, FRA, etc to mortality tables, so the system is dynamic as lifespan is dynamic.
__________________
Never let yesterday use up too much of today.
W. Rogers
Red Badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 11:19 AM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
gayl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Diablo Valley (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 2,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Badger View Post
+1. I would also support raising RA for those entering workforce today (who will most likely see an average life expectancy well beyond 100 years). Perhaps linking RA, FRA, etc to mortality tables, so the system is dynamic as lifespan is dynamic.
+1

If someone has to retire due to injury or body wearing out (happens in some firlds) there's SSDI
gayl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 11:23 AM   #9
Full time employment: Posting here.
BeachOrCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 889
The tweaks to fix it are not that big, but congress doesn't have the balls or the bipartisanship to do it.

Bottom line is when SS / Medicare become a huge drain when compared to their tax revenue (and their votes!), they will fix it. Until then, NOTHING!
BeachOrCity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 12:41 PM   #10
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
The only “fair” solution is generationally shared sacrifice, with some tweaks for transition.
Who decides what "genrerationally shared" is & whatever that is, is "fair"? Me, I think whatever gets shaved will come off the top $ beneficiaries because the mantra will be that we can't harm the poor and those at the top can afford it.
gerntz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2017, 02:01 PM   #11
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
This thread is getting into policy issues, so moved to the Public Policy forum.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 03:19 AM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Koolau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leeward Oahu
Posts: 17,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
I thought a book by that title had been published around a decade ago.
You are likely referring to THE COMING GENERATIONAL STORM by Laurence Kotlikoff and Scott Burns 2004. I've referred to the book often in these pages. By the way, the authors are quite pessimistic that the problem(s) will be solved until it's too late to do it without great travail. YMMV
__________________
Ko'olau's Law -

Anything which can be used can be misused. Anything which can be misused will be.
Koolau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 08:43 AM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,173
I have no problem taking a cut in SS benefits if it helps my children. I support SS for several reasons, the primary one being that many of our fellow citizens can't save worth a dime, and therefore would just end up on welfare anyway. At least SS lets them contribute something to their retirement.

That said.... I would take a cut in SS to help my children and not over burden them. It can be fixed, but the longer we wait the more pain to fix it..... blah, blah, blah,.... nothing new here....
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 09:00 AM   #14
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post
That said.... I would take a cut in SS to help my children and not over burden them.
But, what if I don't want to take a cut to help your children?
ChiliPepr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 09:12 AM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
gayl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Diablo Valley (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 2,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerntz View Post
we can't harm the poor and those at the top can afford it.
+1, yes I can afford it .... actually never planned on it so doesn't hurt my standard of living if you limit my increases
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeachOrCity View Post
The tweaks to fix it are not that big, but congress doesn't have the balls or the bipartisanship to do it.

Bottom line is when SS / Medicare become a huge drain when compared to their tax revenue (and their votes!), they will fix it. Until then, NOTHING!
unfortunately true & by then the cut will be deeper due to delays
gayl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 09:13 AM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
It’s too bad some folks consciously vote for their own selfish interests with no regard whatsoever for others. And then wonder why “we” can’t arrive at a consensus.

And it’s easy to blame politicians for not doing anything about entitlements, while overlooking the fact that partisan voters, PACs and orgs like AARP do everything they can to make sure politicians kick the (obviously unsustainable) can down the road for years.

We get what we deserve, and it’s getting worse, not better.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 09:37 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,173
Some, perhaps a majority, of people who write articles and report the news to do it in a way that, IMHO, trys to pit us against one another. Maybe I am being to sensitive about this issue, but I do think there are those who profit from dividing our country/civilization/culture into a small chunks and then setting them against each other. I do not mean honest disagreement, even heated disagreement, but rather the "We are right/good/virtuous people and our causes are 100% just, while those who disagree with us are bad/greedy/nasty/folks who are the evil enemy".

We seem to have lost the idea of the loyal opposition.

When I read articles like the above I feel more of this divisive attitude.

Like my old grand pappy used to say "It doesn't matter whose half of the boat is sinking".
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 09:43 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post
Some, perhaps a majority, of people who write articles and report the news to do it in a way that, IMHO, trys to pit us against one another. Maybe I am being to sensitive about this issue, but I do think there are those who profit from dividing our country/civilization/culture into a small chunks and then setting them against each other. I do not mean honest disagreement, even heated disagreement, but rather the "We are right/good/virtuous people and our causes are 100% just, while those who disagree with us are bad/greedy/nasty/folks who are the evil enemy".

We seem to have lost the idea of the loyal opposition.

When I read articles like the above I feel more of this divisive attitude.

Like my old grand pappy used to say "It doesn't matter whose half of the boat is sinking".
++++

IMO likely a fatal flaw to our late term democracy.

Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 09:49 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
athena53's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amethyst View Post
Willful and vehement ignorance. The overlap with the "Don't you dare call my entitlement program an 'entitlement!' set is pretty broad.
I know. I've tried to point out to my "it's not an entitlement" friends that the SS benefit formula is heavily-weighted in favor of lower-income workers (my SS will be about half what I could get if I bought a similar annuity with the $$ my employers and I put in, plus a 6% return). On top of that, 85% of my SS is taxed and I get stuck with IRMAA Medicare surcharges, depending on investment results. They're still convinced that their money is coming out of a little bank account with their name on it that contains all their and their employers' contributions. Most have no clue about SS benefits being taxed which is, in effect, a cut in SS benefits.
athena53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 10:12 AM   #20
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post

I have no problem taking a cut in SS benefits if it helps my children.

You could voluntarily pay all or part of your own SS benefits back to the government.

That might buy one overpriced toilet seat for the Pentagon.

.
Helena is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
generational, social security


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Generational Opportunity newporttony FIRE and Money 4 03-17-2009 05:03 PM
Coming Generational Storm - Free Book ats5g FIRE and Money 30 03-08-2007 02:58 PM
Issues with "The Coming Generational Storm" Zoocat Life after FIRE 17 09-27-2006 09:59 AM
The Coming Generational Storm charlie Other topics 17 02-20-2005 05:40 AM
Scott Burns' book 'The Coming Generational Storm' intercst FIRE and Money 10 06-06-2004 10:13 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.