explanade
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- May 10, 2008
- Messages
- 7,442
Bush made a big push this week appearing on some national shows, writing a WSJ op-ed as well as give a speech on his tax proposals.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/201 ... ficit.html
The 28% rate for the top tax bracket is the same as other candidates and Romney's proposal in 2012. Supposedly supply-siders and Club for Growth people have had a heavy influence in 2012 and this year for the tax policies of all the GOP candidates, who all have a 28% top rate except for Trump, who hasn't really spelled it out.
All candidates are pushing for lowering the corporate tax rate, as did Romney.
Now Bush is framing this proposal in the context of it providing sustained 4% GDP. Of course, Republican candidates promising greater economic growth in return for tax cuts is not a new thing. It's been promised at the state level, in states like Kansas, where it hasn't worked out at all.
Bush's proposals could impact retirees or wannabe retirees:
Jeb Bush’s Tax Plan Is Pretty Weird | FiveThirtyEight
He's behind in the polls in the GOP field but he still has the most money, unless Trump is willing to pump hundreds of millions into his campaign.
But even if Bush isn't the nominee, there's a good chance many aspects of his proposal will also be in the GOP platform or in what the GOP nominee proposes next year, since most of the candidates already have similar tax policy features.
Rather than choose between cutting rates for high earners (as old-school Republican supply-siders would prefer) and targeting relief to the middle class (as new-wave Republican reformacons would like), Bush chooses to hand out goodies to just about everybody. Among other things, he would:
- Cut the seven tax brackets we have today down to three, with lower rates of 28, 25, and 10 percent (today, the top rate is 39.6 percent).*
- Double the standard deduction taken by most filers.
- Increase the Earned Income Tax Credit, which helps low-wage workers.
- Eliminate the inheritance tax, which would help the very, very rich.
- Kill the marriage penalty.
- Slash corporate rates to 20 percent (from today's top rate of 35 percent) and let businesses expense capital investments immediately (sounds wonky, but it's a big deal).
In the end, wealthy taxpayers and companies get lower rates, while Bush says more than 15 million additional people would owe no federal income taxes at all. You get a tax cut! And you get a tax cut! And you get a tax cut!
And how would he pay for all this? Well, for one, he's following Donald Trump's populist example by vowing to do away with the carried interest loophole that benefits rich private equity fund managers. But mostly, he'd just cap unnamed "deductions used by the wealthy and Washington special interests." Easy as that.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/201 ... ficit.html
The 28% rate for the top tax bracket is the same as other candidates and Romney's proposal in 2012. Supposedly supply-siders and Club for Growth people have had a heavy influence in 2012 and this year for the tax policies of all the GOP candidates, who all have a 28% top rate except for Trump, who hasn't really spelled it out.
All candidates are pushing for lowering the corporate tax rate, as did Romney.
Now Bush is framing this proposal in the context of it providing sustained 4% GDP. Of course, Republican candidates promising greater economic growth in return for tax cuts is not a new thing. It's been promised at the state level, in states like Kansas, where it hasn't worked out at all.
Bush's proposals could impact retirees or wannabe retirees:
It would encourage older Americans to keep working: Earlier in the campaign, Bush made headlines for saying that Americans “need to work longer hours.” He quickly tried to clarify that he meant that too many workers are stuck in part-time jobs. But as I wrote at the time, Bush was right that one way to achieve faster economic growth is to encourage more Americans to work, or to work more hours than they do now.
Bush’s plan includes a number of provisions that implicitly encourage work, such as expanding the EITC and cutting overall taxes. But it only explicitly targets one group: workers older than 67. Under Bush’s plan, they would be exempt from the employee’s share (but not the employer’s share) of Social Security taxes. That would encourage workers to stay on the job, and presumably encourage companies to keep them by making them cheaper to employ.
If workers delay retirement, that would help the Social Security system (although those gains would be at least partly offset by the lower taxes being paid into the system). But the larger economic effect is less clear. Older workers are already staying in the workforce longer; the age group struggling most in the economy is Americans ages 16 to 24, whose unemployment rate remains in the double digits.
Jeb Bush’s Tax Plan Is Pretty Weird | FiveThirtyEight
He's behind in the polls in the GOP field but he still has the most money, unless Trump is willing to pump hundreds of millions into his campaign.
But even if Bush isn't the nominee, there's a good chance many aspects of his proposal will also be in the GOP platform or in what the GOP nominee proposes next year, since most of the candidates already have similar tax policy features.