|
Social Security expansion bill
02-24-2019, 08:00 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,691
|
Social Security expansion bill
There's been lots of discussion on Social Security perhaps getting cut due to insolvency issues. This new bill being sponsored would actually reverse that and estimates solvency for next 75 years.
Social Security expansion bill poised to gain traction in Congress, targeting those who earn over $400,000
Quote:
- The measure, which would expand benefits for current and future recipients, would extend the program’s solvency for 75 years, according to Social Security’s Office of the Chief Actuary.
- To help fund the proposed changes, earnings above $400,000 would be subject to Social Security taxes. In 2019, earnings above $132,900 are not subject to the levy.
- The payroll tax also would gradually rise to 14.8 percent from the current 12.4 percent by 2043, with workers and their employers splitting that tax as they already do.
|
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
02-24-2019, 08:13 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
|
|
|
|
02-25-2019, 09:25 AM
|
#3
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,584
|
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 08:47 AM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
I didn't see any links in the CNBC article.
See Rep Larson's page here: https://larson.house.gov/social-security-2100
It has his summary of the bill and links to the text and to the SS actuaries report.
One issue that directly affects retirees here is the change in taxation of benefits.
Reading section 104 of the bill, and comparing to the current law at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/86
I think this would simplify the current formula.
For most people, you would:
1) Add one-half your SS benefit to your other income.
2) Subtract $50,000 (or $100,000 if joint) from the number in (1)
3) Take 50% of the number in (2)
4) Calculate 85% of your SS benefit
5) Your taxable benefit is the lesser of (3) or (4)
I don't see the additional calculation step that we have in the current law.
We currently have $44,000 of taxable SS benefits. It looks like this bill would change that to $0.
But, I could be wrong, this stuff is hard to read.
Also, note that Rep Larson calls this the "Social Security 2100 Act".
There is a different bill introduced by Sanders and DeFazio called "Social Security Expansion Act".
|
|
|
Social Security Expansion
02-26-2019, 10:09 AM
|
#5
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,508
|
Social Security Expansion
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobandsherry
There's been lots of discussion on Social Security perhaps getting cut due to insolvency issues. This new bill being sponsored would actually reverse that and estimates solvency for next 75 years.
|
It's good that Congress is starting to look at Social Security changes.
It's not clear that anything can actually be passed now due to the makeup of the current Congress and the current Administration.
But it could become an issue in the 2020 elections and perhaps changes could actually be passed in 2021 that will extend Social Securities solvency out by 75 years or so.
We can only wait and hope.
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 10:28 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: The Shire
Posts: 1,504
|
Thoreau said "Simplify"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Independent
For most people, you would:
1) Add one-half your SS benefit to your other income.
2) Subtract $50,000 (or $100,000 if joint) from the number in (1)
3) Take 50% of the number in (2)
4) Calculate 85% of your SS benefit
5) Your taxable benefit is the lesser of (3) or (4)
|
Tsk, tsk. One more gratuitous, somersaulting calculation full of arbitrary constants which will become victims of either inflation itself or inflation-indexing. Is it any wonder why ordinary people have to use Turbo Tax?
__________________
Paying it forward is the best investment.
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 11:36 AM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdlerth
Tsk, tsk. One more gratuitous, somersaulting calculation full of arbitrary constants which will become victims of either inflation itself or inflation-indexing. Is it any wonder why ordinary people have to use Turbo Tax?
|
I'd say that this calculation has less "somersaulting" than the current version.
And I'll note that the $50k and $100k are not inflation indexed in the bill. Of course, that could change.
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 11:46 AM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Delmarva
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdlerth
Is it any wonder why ordinary people have to use Turbo Tax?
|
Don't forget that Intuit (owner of TurboTax), and undoubtedly others who benefit from tax complexity, continually lobby against any changes in tax laws that would make filing simpler and easier.
__________________
"I can't complain, but sometimes I still do." - Joe Walsh, Life's Been Good
|
|
|
Mine is a voice crying in the wilderness
02-26-2019, 12:29 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: The Shire
Posts: 1,504
|
Mine is a voice crying in the wilderness
Quote:
Originally Posted by Independent
I'd say that this calculation has less "somersaulting" than the current version.
And I'll note that the $50k and $100k are not inflation indexed in the bill. Of course, that could change.
|
Less somersaulting may be better than more, but it's not as good as none.
Seriously, what would be the downside to a tax code with ZERO complications, such that your 1040 would fit on an index card? Why is it that every bill has to include these gymnastics? Sigh...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crabby Mike
Don't forget that Intuit (owner of TurboTax), and undoubtedly others who benefit from tax complexity, continually lobby against any changes in tax laws that would make filing simpler and easier.
|
I don't doubt there are some unholy alliances supporting a system deliberately rigged to confuse the masses. Imagine if they abolished withholding, and when April 15 came everybody had to send in a check? If folks ever realized what they're actually paying, there would be mobs with pitchforks and torches demanding that the madness be stopped. Oh well, I can dream.
__________________
Paying it forward is the best investment.
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 12:39 PM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Champaign
Posts: 4,689
|
I just got a raging headache.
__________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 12:42 PM
|
#11
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,508
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdlerth
Less somersaulting may be better than more, but it's not as good as none.
|
Sure. But hopefully nobody is actually holding their breath waiting for a postcard-size simplified tax return.
Meanwhile back in the real world, we need to make things incrementally better.
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 01:03 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeea
Sure. But hopefully nobody is actually holding their breath waiting for a postcard-size simplified tax return.
Meanwhile back in the real world, we need to make things incrementally better.
|
If they make a postcard-size return, I have little doubt it'll come with more forms/schedules. Look at their track record.
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 02:25 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,264
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobandsherry
There's been lots of discussion on Social Security perhaps getting cut due to insolvency issues. This new bill being sponsored would actually reverse that and estimates solvency for next 75 years.
Social Security expansion bill poised to gain traction in Congress, targeting those who earn over $400,000
Quote:
- The measure, which would expand benefits for current and future recipients, would extend the program’s solvency for 75 years, according to Social Security’s Office of the Chief Actuary.
- To help fund the proposed changes, earnings above $400,000 would be subject to Social Security taxes. In 2019, earnings above $132,900 are not subject to the levy.
- The payroll tax also would gradually rise to 14.8 percent from the current 12.4 percent by 2043, with workers and their employers splitting that tax as they already do.
|
|
I guess the issue that I have with the bulleted items is that I highly suspect that those with earnings over $400,000 that will be paying additional SS tax will not be getting any additional benefit as a result of the higher taxes that they pay.... so the net impact is nothing more than an increasing taxes on people earning more than $400,000. I would object to that as a matter of equity... not because it would impact me or any family members in any way.
The entire reason that the cap exists is because there is a cap on SS benefits so there is a commensurate cap to the earnings subject to tax to be equitable and the proposed bill destroys that equity designed into the current structure.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 03:00 PM
|
#14
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski
I guess the issue that I have with the bulleted items is that I highly suspect that those with earnings over $400,000 that will be paying additional SS tax will not be getting any additional benefit as a result of the higher taxes that they pay.... so the net impact is nothing more than an increasing taxes on people earning more than $400,000. I would object to that as a matter of equity... not because it would impact me or any family members in any way.
The entire reason that the cap exists is because there is a cap on SS benefits so there is a commensurate cap to the earnings subject to tax to be equitable and the proposed bill destroys that equity designed into the current structure.
|
Regarding the benefits in the bill, you are 87% correct. See Section 202. There is a new band above the 15% band that uses a benefit rate of 2%.
I won't comment on "equity" and "entire reason" because I'm guessing that's beyond the scope of the discussion here.
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 03:05 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdlerth
Less somersaulting may be better than more, but it's not as good as none.
Seriously, what would be the downside to a tax code with ZERO complications, such that your 1040 would fit on an index card? Why is it that every bill has to include these gymnastics? Sigh...
|
I agree with you regarding zero complications. I think exchanging ideas on that would have to be a different thread.
I will note that I file a paper 1040. This year's form fit on the top half of an 8.5 x 11 sheet (both sides). Since I have simple taxes, I didn't have to attach any schedules. (But, I did have to do a side calculation to get the taxable portion of my SS benefit.)
|
|
|
02-26-2019, 04:24 PM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,685
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rianne
I just got a raging headache.
|
Take two and call me in the morning?
|
|
|
03-12-2019, 01:43 PM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leeward Oahu
Posts: 17,794
|
I suppose the sooner we "save" SS (again), the better. I hope we have the will to do it. My kids will need the money. I guess we'll see. YMMV
__________________
Ko'olau's Law -
Anything which can be used can be misused. Anything which can be misused will be.
|
|
|
03-18-2019, 09:02 PM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski
I would object to that as a matter of equity...
|
Though I sympa-/empathize, the talking head b-b-b-b-billionaires on CNBC seem to agree with the premise, as several are on record as saying they don't need SS. (Imagine that...)
In general, tilting SS in favor of lower earners makes sense to me.
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire
...not doing anything of true substance...
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|