Tomorrow should be fun... the trade war is escalating

With the DJI down near it's 200 day moving average again, I picked up another 100k of DIA this morning.
 
Let's see, let's see....do we invest my 2018 IRA (want prices to be low) or take out Mr. A.'s RMD (want prices to be high)? Always such a puzzle!
 
The US has a trade surplus on steel with Canada. So much for the trumped up National Security reason. So Canada will end up ahead on the 25% tariffs (assuming anyone can end up ahead on such dangerous games)!

The threat to impose tariffs on autos just indicates the total ignorance of the auto pact. The auto companies are not stupid!
 
Last edited:
The US has a trade surplus on steel with Canada. So much for the trumped up National Security reason. So Canada will end up ahead on the 25% tariffs (assuming anyone can end up ahead on such dangerous games)!

The threat to impose tariffs on autos just indicates the total ignorance of the auto pact. The auto companies are not stupid!

I think you better do some more reading because you are flat out wrong:greetings10:

https://www.trade.gov/steel/countries/pdfs/imports-Canada.pdf

https://www.trade.gov/steel/countries/pdfs/imports-us.pdf
 


The United States by far accounted for the largest share of Canada’s imports by source country at 55 percent (4.8 mmt), followed by China at 10 percent (0.8 mmt), South Korea at 4 percent (0.4 mmt), Brazil at 3 percent (0.3 mmt), and Turkey at 3 percent (0.3 mmt).
Notably, while Canada’s top source countries have shifted from year to year, the United States has ranked as Canada’s top import source for steel products for more than 20 years.

Not a surplus?
 
Not a surplus?




" the United States has ranked as Canada’s top import source for steel products for more than 20 years."


What don't you understand?:facepalm: kcowan is saying that Canada imports more steel from the US than we US import from Canada. Read the 2 pdf linked reports above in my post. Plus Canada has been proven to ship dumped Chinese steel to us. They got caught. You know what there answer was, we're try harder next time. Its called transshipment, the link is below.

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3f3b2007-0998-46d9-975a-75f439e12cf7
 
Last edited:
OK, I'll do the math for you guys.

U.S. imported 34.6 MMT in 2017, 17% from Canada = 5.88 MMT
Canada imported 8.7 MMT in 2017, 55% from U.S. = 4.78 MMT

U.S. imports 1.1 MMT more that it exports. In trade talk this is a trade deficit (import more than export), not a surplus. The "deficit" is that U.S. is sending cash to Canada for steel. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/trade_deficit.asp
 
Obviously this is a topic that is beyond the capacity of our politicians to comprehend.
 
Is it useful/illuminating to go commodity-by-commodity to analyze our trade surplus or deficit with each country? The US has a huge banana trade deficit with Honduras. Is the answer to put a tariff on Honduran bananas, or to demand that Honduras step up the importation of bananas grown in the US? Cars, trucks, steel, bananas--is there any reason to expect or even desire import/export parity in each, when countries have comparative advantages (the very thing that makes international trade a net benefit for all)?
 
I do not like trade wars over surpluses or deficits, but certainly if the tariff playing field is not level or their is intellectual property theft it needs to be addressed.
 
I don't worry about day to day. We will see.

-ERD50

Yeah me either back in 08. Then I lost the gains of a decade or more.
I have learned that there are people (in government) that have an interest in collapsing the economy so their friends can buy up everything at fire sale prices. I now invest in Real Estate.
 
OK, I'll do the math for you guys.

U.S. imported 34.6 MMT in 2017, 17% from Canada = 5.88 MMT
Canada imported 8.7 MMT in 2017, 55% from U.S. = 4.78 MMT

U.S. imports 1.1 MMT more that it exports. In trade talk this is a trade deficit (import more than export), not a surplus. The "deficit" is that U.S. is sending cash to Canada for steel. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/trade_deficit.asp

Would you not have to convert this into US Dollars to get the true answer ?

If US only paid $100/imperial long tonne for crappy Chinese-supplied Canadian steel

But Canada paid $10,000/imperial long tonne for our pristine US-made (recycled Canadian/Chinese) steel ... wouldn't this be a surplus ?
 
Yeah me either back in 08. Then I lost the gains of a decade or more.
I have learned that there are people (in government) that have an interest in collapsing the economy so their friends can buy up everything at fire sale prices. I now invest in Real Estate.

I thought I learned that there are people (in government) that have an interest in collapsing the Real Estate market, so their friends can buy up everything at fire sale prices. I now invest in the stock market, buying on the dips.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4060386-u-s-real-estate-market-trends-characteristics-outlook

The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index from a peak of 184.62 in July 2006 reached a nadir of 134.01 in February 2012, or a fall of 27%. Regional markets, in particular Las Vegas, Phoenix, Miami and California, were hit with bigger corrections, ranging from 40% to 65%.

There might be some satire in the above post.

-ERD50
 
Would you not have to convert this into US Dollars to get the true answer ?

If US only paid $100/imperial long tonne for crappy Chinese-supplied Canadian steel

But Canada paid $10,000/imperial long tonne for our pristine US-made (recycled Canadian/Chinese) steel ... wouldn't this be a surplus ?

Could be, but a commodity is a commodity for a reason.
 
I thought I learned that there are people (in government) that have an interest in collapsing the Real Estate market, so their friends can buy up everything at fire sale prices. I now invest in the stock market, buying on the dips.

I see what you did there. Arent you clever.
I have more control with real estate than with the machinations behind the scenes and the insider trading that goes on on a daily basis with Wall street. But to each their own
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My concern, and frustration, is that our politicians are often more concerned with their party "winning" rather than what is best for our nation and our economy. And this is an issue that occurs on both sides.
 
...
I have more control with real estate than with the machinations behind the scenes and the insider trading that goes on on a daily basis with Wall street. But to each their own

I think you may be deluding yourself. The quote I provided:

The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index from a peak of 184.62 in July 2006 reached a nadir of 134.01 in February 2012, or a fall of 27%. Regional markets, in particular Las Vegas, Phoenix, Miami and California, were hit with bigger corrections, ranging from 40% to 65%.

Some of those numbers are a bigger drop than what my portfolio experienced.

-ERD50
 
Wow, looks like the market is headed back up today! Up 272 points already and it's only 10:43 AM on the east coast. Now that's a nice surprise, for me anyway.

That said, I must be some sort of pessimist. I had already assumed that we were well on our way to another 2008-2009. Not that it makes much difference to a buy-and-hold broad index investor like me; TBH I'm not losing any sleep over the market.
 
Wow, looks like the market is headed back up today! Up 272 points already and it's only 10:43 AM on the east coast. Now that's a nice surprise, for me anyway.

That said, I must be some sort of pessimist. I had already assumed that we were well on our way to another 2008-2009. Not that it makes much difference to a buy-and-hold broad index investor like me; TBH I'm not losing any sleep over the market.

Apparently. you called the top.
 
Let see Stephen Colbert got slagged on twitter and the SCOTUS authorized selective bans?
 
Back
Top Bottom