Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Wharton Proposal to Strengthen SS: Lump Sums?
Old 10-10-2018, 05:28 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 4,532
Wharton Proposal to Strengthen SS: Lump Sums?

Link to article

Delay Social Security or Not? How Lump Sum Payments Could Help

Interesting idea: studies they've done show that people planning to quit work at 62 and collect SS might be motivated to keep working if they were offered that same monthly amount at a later age (e.g., FRA) plus a lump sum. The lump sum, of course, would be a function of the foregone SS income between age 62 and actual filing age, but something less than what's "actuarially fair".

I see the advantage for the solvency of SS. My concern would be that the people who would take advantage of this might be the ones who need the larger monthly income from waiting (which they're giving up) and that they might squander the lump sum. I'd also be concerned about the tax bill on the lump sum.

Good idea or bad?
__________________

athena53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-10-2018, 05:47 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
USGrant1962's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: DC area
Posts: 1,381
No opinion, but it would give us an excuse for a weekly "take/don't take the SS lump sum" thread to add to "when to take SS" and "paying off the mortgage."
__________________

__________________
FI and Semi-ER March 24, 2017
Consulting to stay engaged

"All models are wrong, some are useful." - George Box
USGrant1962 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 06:54 PM   #3
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,508
I don't need any incentive to delay my benefits. So that change would be of no use to me.
joeea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2018, 01:38 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,596
Most people who post here intend that the date they quit work will be/was different from the date they start SS benefits.

I expect that for most people not posting on an "early retirement" forum, those dates are the same.

Mitchell is concerned about "retirement security", specifically those people who really can't afford to quit work at 62, but haven't thought through how expensive retirement can be, so they quit work and retire without sufficient total resources.

Mitchell is hoping that the option of a lump sum will keep people working longer and those people will save some meaningful portion of what they earn, or of the lump sum.

She is hoping that is true for people who haven't saved much in the past.

She is also hoping that the people who were planning to work past 62 anyway, will not be tempted by the lump sum option and take it just so they can fund that trip to Hawaii or new RV that they really can't afford.

That seems like a lot of assumptions to me.
Independent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2018, 02:13 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Red Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Hog Mountian
Posts: 1,985
That lump sum might not look so attractive is there a tax on 85% of it.

And yep, lots of assumptions and speculation on a highly unlikely scenario.
__________________
Never let yesterday use up too much of today.
W. Rogers
Red Badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mortality salience: why retirees tend to choose lump sums Big_Hitter FIRE and Money 62 08-23-2016 05:37 AM
Interest Rates, Lump Sums and leaving Mega Corp Tekward FIRE and Money 2 05-10-2013 01:30 PM
Do you handle lump sums differently? SecondCor521 FIRE and Money 32 10-18-2010 05:45 PM
Firecalc lessons on drip feeding lump sums ? johng FIRECalc support 2 06-13-2009 03:33 PM
Anyone Hear This on Pension Lump Sums? RetireeRobert FIRE and Money 2 12-03-2007 05:46 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
×