Luck_Club
Full time employment: Posting here.
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2016
- Messages
- 733
The next phase in my retirement plan is to repay debt at an accelerated rate. I have about $530K lump sum of cash to deploy. My preference would be to obtain a new HELOC, retiring my mortgage and increasing my HELOC to 80% of my home value. The bank offers a unique product which has a 35 year draw period (i'm 50 ). The appraisal came in at $675K.
For various reasons which they haven't disclosed they want to completely ignore certain income streams, and not count assets I hold. For example I sold a property and am hold a 3 year baloon note worth $90K that has a 5.5% interest only payment beginning this month. Sorry that can't count as income, because it wasn't on 2016 tax return. The $25,000 carryover loss takes away from my income. I am truly in the dark as to why they are dragging their feet on approving the line increase. Back of the envelope looks pretty safe from my perspective, with nearly double the income/ cash flow required to qualify. If it wasn't for wanting the ability to pounce on opportunities I wouldn't even care.
So my original plan was to prepay my first mortgage and 1 rental mortgage, and this would give me plenty of capacity ($400K+)to add more rentals as a cash buyer. If they don't rewrite the line, should I hold the cash for investment opportunities, prepaying just the 1 rental mortgage, leaving the now non-deductible primary loan, and a bunch of cash earning 0.5%?
If they rewrite I'm golden, and know the path to take. If they don't I'm struggling with the balance between holding the cash for opportunity, and freeing up cash flow. My plan is to buy 1 more rental at some point, and possibly a second home in Florida which may or may not be rental material, so I kind of need about $400K liquidity or easy credit.
Thoughts, suggestions?
For various reasons which they haven't disclosed they want to completely ignore certain income streams, and not count assets I hold. For example I sold a property and am hold a 3 year baloon note worth $90K that has a 5.5% interest only payment beginning this month. Sorry that can't count as income, because it wasn't on 2016 tax return. The $25,000 carryover loss takes away from my income. I am truly in the dark as to why they are dragging their feet on approving the line increase. Back of the envelope looks pretty safe from my perspective, with nearly double the income/ cash flow required to qualify. If it wasn't for wanting the ability to pounce on opportunities I wouldn't even care.
So my original plan was to prepay my first mortgage and 1 rental mortgage, and this would give me plenty of capacity ($400K+)to add more rentals as a cash buyer. If they don't rewrite the line, should I hold the cash for investment opportunities, prepaying just the 1 rental mortgage, leaving the now non-deductible primary loan, and a bunch of cash earning 0.5%?
If they rewrite I'm golden, and know the path to take. If they don't I'm struggling with the balance between holding the cash for opportunity, and freeing up cash flow. My plan is to buy 1 more rental at some point, and possibly a second home in Florida which may or may not be rental material, so I kind of need about $400K liquidity or easy credit.
Thoughts, suggestions?