Independent
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 4,629
Those are "period" life tables. The calculation assumes no changes in mortality rates after you are born. So, the age 60 mortality rate for the group born in 1950 is the mortality rate for 60 year olds in 1950, not the mortality rate for 60 year olds in 2010.Simple, eh? Average Life Expectancy is 78.6 years.
Maybe not that simple. That 78.6 is the average for men and women for persons born in 2010. Since you weren't born in 1910, is there another way of looking at age?
Try this:
https://www.infoplease.com/life-expectancy-birth-race-and-sex-1930-2010
It's the average life expectancy based birth year. Much ado about nothing, except that you might want to see how you're doing compared to the odds.
I think that if you want to compare yourself to other people in your birth year cohort, it is better to use a "cohort" table.
This is the percent of men born in 1930, who were expected to live/actually lived to 80:
According to the period table: 18%
According to a cohort table: 38%
If you'd rather look at medians:
According to the period table, almost 50% of the boys were expected to make it to 66.
According to the cohort table, almost 50% of the boys actually made it to 73.
The difference is that people born in 1930 experienced reduced mortality rates during their lifetimes.
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/as120/LifeTables_Tbl_6_1930.html
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/as120/LifeTables_Tbl_7_1930.html
Last edited: