FANOFJESUS
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Are some of you at the minimum stock allocation and are you at comfortable with that?
Last edited:
Would like to know.
I have no idea what this phrase means.... minimum asset allocation ...
I have no idea what this phrase means.
I think everyone has their own definition of "minimum stock allocation" so I'm not sure the responses you get will be useful.Are some of you at the minimum stock allocation and are you at comfortable with that?
What's the minimum?
Yeah, I still have no idea what that means. There's no minimum, just a preferred AA, the way I'm thinking about it. Although I guess 0% equities would be a minimum!
Are some of you at the minimum stock allocation and are you at comfortable with that?
I'm assuming that what you really may be asking is...Are some of you at the minimum stock allocation and are you at comfortable with that?
and added to that, could be,Are some of you at a minimal stock allocation, and are you comfortable with that?
and if so, why?
...
If that was the goal of the question,...
I suppose you (edit: could) short the market, to have a negative allocation to stocks?..
-ERD50
A lot of people would call 40% stocks minimum.
A lot of people would call 40% stocks minimum.