... since you are dismissing her ideas would you say that these numbers and indicators all are irrelevant to the current inflation vs recession debate?
Well, before we talk about economic forecasting, lets talk about a much simpler problem: a trout stream:
Assemble your favorite team of experts along the shore and have them give you a prediction of what the ripples, whorles, and splashes will be along a line across the stream an hour from now. Impossible, right? But we have all the mathematics of incompressible flows nailed. If we can't even predict a simple trout stream when have the math, what can we reliably predict? Answer: not much.
Now consider economic forecasting. No mathematics pertains. Literally billions of actors. External events like the weather, man-caused events, ... When you consider this, you can easily conclude that economic forecasting is, like the trout stream, impossible.
"
The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.” Often attributed to John Kenneth Galbraith but apparently actually from Ezra Solomon, a member of the Council of Economic Advisors during the Nixon administration. Nothing has changed in the half-century since Dr. Solomon made this observation.
For further research, I recommend that you read "
the signal and the noise" by Nate Silver, particularly the chapter titled "How to Drown in Three Feet of Water."
...And if so - what are you looking for to indicate that things are changing and the inflation would be coming down?
Same way I check to see how my garden is doing. I take a look out the window. Getting today's numbers is as close as I can get to knowing anything useful. Listening to thousands of chattering monkeys, each making credible-sounding predictions, is a waste of time. Cathy is actually worse than the average chattering monkey; she is a monkey with an agenda.