I found a real estate vs paper investing debate yesterday. The argument was for real estate so bias existed, but it provided valid information on why real estate could be vehicle to retire faster.
1.) If you had $100,000, how much paper assets can you buy? Exactly $100,000. Thats how much money was used to purchase the paper.
If you had $100,000 how much real estate can you buy? Maybe $500,000, maybe $1,000,000, maybe more. Leverage can buy 10x or 20x more than you actually invest.
2.) How much are $100,000 of paper assets worth when you bought them. Again exactly $100,000. Thats what the paper was worth when purchased at that particular time.
How much is the $1,000,000 of real estate worth that was purchased with $100,000? Could be $750,000. Or could be $1,500,000. I don't know what this is called, but through my own investing, know that it definately exists and is ready to be taken advantage of with proper research.
3.) How can you increase the value of the $100,000 in paper? Maybe write a letter to the company CEO? I don't know.
How can you increase the value of the of the $1,500,000? We could spend all day discussing this.
Of course there are negatives to real estate vs paper assets. One is time. Real estate will take more time in research and following the purchasing/fixing/renting process.
Just some points worth posting for thoughs looking to retire earlier.
OKKKKKK.... just a point or two on your posts...
You CAN buy more 'paper' as you call it than $100,000. It is called purchasing on margin.... if you want to make the gamble and do it with the right stocks you can probably get about $300,000 invested.
You will be hard pressed to get 20X in RE. I would think 10X is close to the upper limit (without some owner financing or other kind of deals that are under the radar). So, max $1,000,000.... but more than likely $500K to $700K.
Your next sentance makes no sense... if you purchased $1 mill in RE... it is worth $1 mill... now, it might go up and down from there over time... but it is not $500K or $1.5 mill then...
But, say it is the $1 mill... and the value of the RE goes down to $900K... guess what... you are now bankrupt with an illiquid asset but with loan payments that must be met. What if you can not rent it out for a month or two... do you have enough cash flow to overcome that?
What if there is a natural disaster, such as hurricane, tornado, flooding, wind damage, fire etc. etc.... for sure you are not getting any income from them plus you have to hope that you have enough insurance to cover the disaster.
How do you affect the value of the RE
Not as much as you might think. Yes, you can improve the property (by spending money) and make it more valuable... that is if you do not get the price out of range of the neighborhood... market forces have more to do with the value than you probably think... there is a sq. ft. rate for most location... usually you can not get to much more than that rate no matter how good yours is...
RE can take a lot of time... if you want, paper can be something that you take a look at once a year (or even less from what I have seen of some people)....
Now, I am not saying RE is bad... just that there are a lot of risks that most people do not consider. People think that the leverage is good... but forget that it also works on the downside and can wipe you out faster than you think. RE is also not liquid. RE also requires you to get tenants, deal with them and also deal with the taxes. I would much rather not spend the time and energy doing this JOB. I get paid very well doing the job I have.