Recent content by 24601NoMore

  1. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    OP here..appreciate the replies.. I guess this all boils down to a question of why any of us invest - or why we continue to invest. If one reaches a point where it is not necessary to invest any longer, why incur risk that you don't "need" to take? Is it bragging rights? Wanting to always...
  2. 2

    Ladders

    As I understand it (no means an expert), your TIPS bought at $X is worth $X + the cumulative inflation increase determined by CPI-W each year. You can sell that TIPS at any time, though you may get more of less than face value depending on where interest rates/yields are at if you do. If you...
  3. 2

    Ladders

    While CD rates have indeed dropped, MYGAs could be an option as there are still 5+% 5-year (& 7-year) MYGAs available. At least at StanTheAnnuityMan. So I assume Blueprint and others have similar/the same. Here's a good place to search to see options. Many A, A+ and even a couple A++ rated...
  4. 2

    Ladders

    I'm in the same boat as you. Don't really "need" lots of growth - but I do want / need capital preservation through end of life. I'm very conservative by nature also, have a fairly pessimistic view of what likely lies ahead in the next 10 years or so in markets and want to have "enough" vs...
  5. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    Ah, OK. But wouldn't allocating some of that to buy LTC insurance if that's a concern be worth doing?
  6. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    I don't follow. If you have what you started with AND can safely withdraw 4% a year to pay the bills, what's the issue? To me, that's the absolute ideal scenario. You've paid the bills AND preserved principal (vs risking it all on the roulette wheel we call "The Market"). Albeit, the...
  7. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    I'm genuinely curious what one would be looking to achieve by being 90-95% equity at age 70?
  8. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    BTW, I find the different goals and comfort levels expressed when these types of discussions come up somewhat fascinating. Maybe because we don't have kids to leave our assets to, I don't care about maximizing the size of the piggy bank just to have "more" when we pass. But it sure seems like...
  9. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    Well, I ran Firecalc with 0% stocks and it tells me we have a 100% chance of successful retirement, so all is good :) Reading more about TIPS..might think of picking some of those up. Should have also mentioned I have a pretty hefty allocation to fixed income (MYGAs, CDs, Bond Funds)...
  10. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    Thanks..was more curious what others have done and couldn't think of what to search for to see previous comments but will try "won the game". TIPS are probably a solution for us, but I honestly don't even pretend to understand how they work. Something to look into more for sure.
  11. 2

    Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+

    We're both in our 60s (me - early, wife - mid) and are getting increasingly uncomfortably holding equities - even at our current ~22% of portfolio. Largely because of current excessively stretched valuations and what I see happening in the economy - and also because an even 25% let alone 50%...
  12. 2

    Wellesley Fund

    Would seem to be a less than optimal time to sell any bond-heavy fund like Wellesley, as yields are more likely to drop than rise at this point, which of course will (perhaps quite significantly) raise NAV of bond-heavy funds like Wellesley. Markets are now "pricing in" 3 rate cuts this year...
  13. 2

    Another Vanguard Rant

    There's a (perhaps obvious) downside to converting to non-Admiral shares, though, with those standard version funds have a higher ER than Admiral. AFAIK, Admiral are "only" available through VG. That was one of the lock-in tricks VG pulled a while back.
  14. 2

    Another Vanguard Rant

    Yep! Named Beneficiaries on TOD/POD accounts over-ride all else - wills, trusts, family squabbles, disagreements, hurt feelings etc. If there's a TOD/POD beneficiary on an account, that person receives their designated percentage of those assets, period. Nothing else matters. At least that's...
  15. 2

    Another Vanguard Rant

    When I pressed them on the reason why, they claimed it's because there are a lot of legal potholes for them when joint owners die "at the same time". They claim that's rare..one person may die a minute or two after the other, etc. And the state laws about this vary so significantly across...
Back
Top Bottom