A serious question - Immortality ?

C

cyber888

Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
1,985
So, you have saved a lot of money, and you are retired.
Have you ever dedicated some research time, and energy
to immortality. Well, when I mean 'immortality', I don't
mean living forever, but living another 500 - 1000 years.

Human beings in the bible like Methusala, Noah, Abraham,
Enoch, live between 300 - 1000 years.
I have translated Buddhist scriptures for a Buddhist master,
and according to my Buddhist master, ancient scriptures
talk about how humans use to live to 10,000 years. The same scripture
also said that before this world ends and becomes a dead planet - human life will only have a lifespan of 20 years as world conditions and the environment would be too harsh for life to be more than that.

Cell telomeres have been recently discovered as the key to prolonging
human life. As we grow older, they become shorter until they cannot replicate. Just like a xerox copy, the more you copy a copy - it degrades further. We may just have been cloned from the original humans, and our DNA flawed to age quickly. The bible mentioned after the Tower of Babel that 'God' capped human age to around '100', and the Great Flood was meant to destroy the nephilim giants, who were sons of angel and men.

The selling of 'MonoAtomic Gold' has also flourished, and I'm not sure if anyone has tried it. For so many years, Gold has always been a precious metal and no one really knows much use for it. Men in history have always tried to hord and accumulate gold. Now, everyone says, we must have it in our body, just like having iron, copper, and other mineral elements, because it is a superconductor and can reverse aging, and the only metal that does not corrode under water.

Anyway, I've said enough. Please don't flame me for just bringing up the possibilities. Several men of intellect and scholars have searched for immortality. And scientist today are still doing just that. Just thought it's an interesting topic of discussion. :)
 
I don't see why immortality is a biological impossibility.

We do spend a good portion of our lives growing stronger. So it's not like the replacement of old cells with newer, even better, cells is something our bodies are incapable of doing already.

I suspect one day we'll figure out why we transition from growing stronger to growing weaker and maybe even how to stop that deterioration. But by then we'll all be cyborgs with replaceable parts or we'll have already uploaded our consciousness to the singularity.

But no, it's not something I think about.
 
Last edited:
popcorn.gif
 
Its already been proven a restricted diet in mice allows them to live 20% longer than average mice.
All the old folks at the retirement home are basically thin, I don't see any fat ones there in the 80-100 yr range, so I guess it applies to humans as well.

Just the other day I was talking to a 94 yr old lady, sharp as a pin, who told me about her 2 dead husbands, and her dead daughter. I told her, she was like an immortal !!

Turns out there is a downside to immortality.
 
Trans-humanism is a growing discussion - When we incorporate technology into our body.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism

Gone4Good said:
I don't see why immortality is a biological impossibility.

We do spend a good portion of our lives growing stronger. So it's not like the replacement of old cells with newer, even better, cells is something our bodies are incapable of doing already.

I suspect one day we'll figure out why we transition from growing stronger to growing weaker and maybe even how to stop that deterioration. But by then we'll all be cyborgs with replaceable parts or we'll have already uploaded our consciousness to the singularity.

But no, it's not something I think about.
Click to expand...
 
Extended life is interesting only if it has quality. That means healthy enough to at minimum get out and about, look after myself, etc. as well as having friends and family who have similar extended lifespans. It also means having the legal ability to end the extension when I desire. Science fiction has explored extended lifespan, and without quality it doesn't look appealing.
 
I think the human species life span will continue to increase incrementally due to good science and healthier diets. Just think, the next Early Retirement Forum maybe targeting those getting out of the rat race at 90 and getting their first social security check at 102 !
 
GrayHare said:
Extended life is interesting only if it has quality. That means healthy enough to at minimum get out and about, look after myself, etc. as well as having friends and family who have similar extended lifespans. It also means having the legal ability to end the extension when I desire. Science fiction has explored extended lifespan, and without quality it doesn't look appealing.
Click to expand...

That's the situation we have now. After the big increases in life expectancy from water treatment and antibiotics that happened a few generations ago most of the progress we've made hasn't so much extended life as it has extend old age.
 
Yes, there's a downside. My wife is 13 years my senior, and she looks 30 years younger than her age (no kidding). At our last annual check-up at our primary physician's office, there was a new nurse. She looked at my wife and could not believe her age. My wife tried to convince her but to no avail. So, she was about to report my wife as a fraud and an Identity Theft taking someone else insurance. But before she did, she reported it to our doctor. And the doctor laughed at her and said, Yes, Ms.xxx has been coming here for the last 14 years and she is who she says. I can see how this is a problem in society. If you've seen the movie 'Age of Adaline', the woman gained immortality and she was running her whole life afraid that society might discover her.

Sunset said:
Its already been proven a restricted diet in mice allows them to live 20% longer than average mice.
All the old folks at the retirement home are basically thin, I don't see any fat ones there in the 80-100 yr range, so I guess it applies to humans as well.

Just the other day I was talking to a 94 yr old lady, sharp as a pin, who told me about her 2 dead husbands, and her dead daughter. I told her, she was like an immortal !!

Turns out there is a downside to immortality.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Interesting how while laymen are so optimistic, medical experts are somewhat glum about the advance of medicine.

References:

The Emperor of All Maladies, Siddhartha Mukherjee (2010)
Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End, Atul Gawande (2014)
The Cancer Chronicles: Unlocking Medicine's Deepest Mystery, George Johnson (2013)
 
First, you have to believe that the bible is telling the truth... if you are religious then you do... if you are not some of what they put down is a stretch....



From my limited knowledge (and it is very limited), I have not read anything in the fossil records that would show that any of the ancient people lived a long life... heck, it shows that 40 was old....

I am not saying that there might not be some way to extend life to between 500 and 1000 years.... but even if that became a reality that is still a blip in time according to the cosmic time frame... not immortality....
 
Read Simone de Beauvoir's "All Men are Mortal" (Tous les homes sont mortels). A guy in the middle Ages takes a potion that will allow him to live forever and by the 20th century he's survived countless wives and children, fought too many battles, and he's bored out of his mind. (DH tells me there's a lot of science fiction with this plot.) Even if it were possible I wouldn't be interested.
 
athena53 said:
Read Simone de Beauvoir's "All Men are Mortal" (Tous les homes sont mortels). A guy in the middle Ages takes a potion that will allow him to live forever and by the 20th century he's survived countless wives and children, fought too many battles, and he's bored out of his mind. (DH tells me there's a lot of science fiction with this plot.) Even if it were possible I wouldn't be interested.
Click to expand...
Heck, they told me the same thing when I ER'd quite a while ago "you'll be bored to tears, what are you going to do all day?". Well, it hasn't happened yet. I rather suspect that truly long life spans would be wonderful (assuming commensurate health that is). So you want to travel the universe and see what's out there at sub light speeds? No problem, you got the money honey I got the time...imagination is the limit.

As to true immortality as in forever? From everything I've read our solar system and even the universe won't last forever so I'll worry about that after I've toured a billion galaxies or so :flowers:
 
athena53 said:
Read Simone de Beauvoir's "All Men are Mortal" (Tous les homes sont mortels). A guy in the middle Ages takes a potion that will allow him to live forever and by the 20th century he's survived countless wives and children, fought too many battles, and he's bored out of his mind. (DH tells me there's a lot of science fiction with this plot.) Even if it were possible I wouldn't be interested.
Click to expand...

I'm not hugely interested in outliving all my friends and family either. But that's not what scientific life extension would entail. Presumably all my friends and family would be in the same immortality boat as me.

And I can't imagine life ever being too boring. You know what sounds really boring? Not living.
 
GrayHare said:
Extended life is interesting only if it has quality. That means healthy enough to at minimum get out and about, look after myself, etc. as well as having friends and family who have similar extended lifespans. It also means having the legal ability to end the extension when I desire. Science fiction has explored extended lifespan, and without quality it doesn't look appealing.
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't an extended life span have the same quality as it does now?

All things being equal, one could assume that someone who today lives to 90 that started to go downhill at 85, that with an extended life to age 130 they would start to go downhill at 120 - 125 rather than at 85.
 
Gone4Good said:
I'm not hugely interested in outliving all my friends and family either......
Click to expand...
Interesting point. My late aunt and uncle were like Energizer bunnies right into their 90's, always active and current. Then he died rather suddenly and finally she really was ready to die, as well, as she had outlived all her friends and family except their kids. It was strange to see that change in her.

So, yea, being immortal but losing everyone around you would be kinda suck.
 
Here's a fossil record that cannot be explained in simple terms (video link below). Were these the Nephilims of the bible?

https://socioecohistory.wordpress.c...-skull-released-not-human-nephilim-skeletons/

Texas Proud said:
First, you have to believe that the bible is telling the truth... if you are religious then you do... if you are not some of what they put down is a stretch....



From my limited knowledge (and it is very limited), I have not read anything in the fossil records that would show that any of the ancient people lived a long life... heck, it shows that 40 was old....

I am not saying that there might not be some way to extend life to between 500 and 1000 years.... but even if that became a reality that is still a blip in time according to the cosmic time frame... not immortality....
Click to expand...
 
Am currently going to an eight week study group that covers the dead sea scrolls.
While the series is not specifically about immortality, the span of knowledge that the scrolls cover presents with some deeper thought about life, and the ways it has been seen in the BCE and the CE.
Difficult to look at time and history as wev'e been taught, and the reality of time as measured by the various dating methods. Here's an image that puts life and time into a perspective that few understand, and fewer could recount as historical periods.

img_1702600_0_eacc77c6d1223ee7e14c187067b54815.jpg
 
Music Lover said:
Why wouldn't an extended life span have the same quality as it does now?

All things being equal, one could assume that someone who today lives to 90 that started to go downhill at 85, that with an extended life to age 130 they would start to go downhill at 120 - 125 rather than at 85.
Click to expand...

What modern medicine has done in many cases is keep people from dying suddenly from things like heart attacks and strokes in their sixties and early seventies only to have them endure extended periods of debilitating illness like dementia.
 
Immortality has been brought up as a thread topic numerous times before. I cannot get excited about it, because the average age at death is only 78.74 years in 2012.

And the dead people include not just the older people but also the younger ones who supposedly enjoyed modern medicine, so that should reduce a lot of infant mortality already.

Among the people who died, no doubt a few died from accidents or violent deaths, but then those are also obstacles to one's achieving immortality. You would need to be an unkillable vampire or zombie, not just a non-aging or disease-immune person. And you should not go to public spaces, like running the Boston Marathon or go hanging out in a Paris cafe. Don't go hide out in remote places like Alaska either, where grizzlies roam. Don't take airplanes that can crash, drive cars that can be T-boned, ships that can sink. Try to avoid crowds, which can give you flu, pneumonia, as these kill many elderlies.

Immortality is tough.

NW-Bound said:
Interesting how while laymen are so optimistic, medical experts are somewhat glum about the advance of medicine.

References:

The Emperor of All Maladies, Siddhartha Mukherjee (2010)
Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End, Atul Gawande (2014)
The Cancer Chronicles: Unlocking Medicine's Deepest Mystery, George Johnson (2013)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

street
Who wears a wedding ring
4 5 6
EvanC
E
S
ACA questions
2 3 4
mebden
mebden
aja8888
Getting a Pacemaker next week....questions, experiences?
2 3 4
audreyh1
audreyh1
E
Mayo Clinic Coverage When in Texas
Rianne
Rianne
A
Medigap in New York questions Plan G HD with EmblemHealth, Bankers Conseco, or Globe Life Insurance
jim584672
J

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom