gcgang
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 1,611
I invested in some mutual funds for my daughter many years ago in a UTMA. She’s now of age and filing her own tax return.
She has minimal income this year, so I was thinking of having her realize some of the gains on those tax inefficient, higher expense funds.
Choices considered for reinvestment are BRKB, an S&P etf, or an active ETF managed by the same manager that would map her current holdings.
When I try to research how active ETFs are taxed, 95% of the results are promos for fund managers.
I’ve come to understand how an AP assists in redeeming or issuing new ETF shares without incurring tax. What I haven’t been able to find is how the active ETF is taxed (or not) when they sell something in the ETF.
For example, if a fund bot NVDA a couple years ago and decided to sell it this year, a mutual fund would pass on the net gains to shareholders. Is the active ETF subject to different rules or would they also generate a tax liability for shareholders?
Or can the active ETF avoid those taxes by shifting the NVDA to the AP? I can’t believe that would be allowed, as the IRS would be deprived of their fair share.
She has minimal income this year, so I was thinking of having her realize some of the gains on those tax inefficient, higher expense funds.
Choices considered for reinvestment are BRKB, an S&P etf, or an active ETF managed by the same manager that would map her current holdings.
When I try to research how active ETFs are taxed, 95% of the results are promos for fund managers.
I’ve come to understand how an AP assists in redeeming or issuing new ETF shares without incurring tax. What I haven’t been able to find is how the active ETF is taxed (or not) when they sell something in the ETF.
For example, if a fund bot NVDA a couple years ago and decided to sell it this year, a mutual fund would pass on the net gains to shareholders. Is the active ETF subject to different rules or would they also generate a tax liability for shareholders?
Or can the active ETF avoid those taxes by shifting the NVDA to the AP? I can’t believe that would be allowed, as the IRS would be deprived of their fair share.
Last edited: