I too was suspicious -- but I think some of you might adjust your opinions if you started to use A.I. for investment research. I have found claude.ai especially adept at uncovering important facts and comparisons. And it will often go further, adding depth to its answers. It helps if I ask it questions of limited range.
Ex: I wouldn't ask "What are the three best closed end funds?" But I could ask, "What income closed end funds have positive UNII?" or "Which Blackrock closed end funds are fully earning their distributions?"
Or I might ask, "Where would a beginner fly fisherman travel in North Carolina for an abundance of easy access rivers?" Not only did claude.ai tell me what two or three towns to consider, but would also locate the rivers and several access points.
I like claude.ai so much I moved up to pay for their intermediate level of service -- something quite unusual for me.
OTOH ---- One question it could not (or would not) answer was "Which ETFs have recently signaled a bullish MACD indicator?" I know the information is out there but it seems it will not dig behind paywalls to dig out factoids for you.
FINALLY, with investing I will sometimes double check to see if Gemini agrees with Claude's responses.
A.I. is a tool; useful but not foolproof. Handy, but not exhaustive.