Analysis Paralysis-Is too much information giving you excuses?

Yoheadden

Full time employment: Posting here.
Joined
Jul 27, 2019
Messages
568
This is an article that is about people who have done all of the pre retirement work, check and rechecked the #s, but still can’t pull the trigger.

Why more information won't help you decide
Had three different conversations this week with people who are trying to decide whether to retire.
All three are financially comfortable, all three have done extensive research, all three have spreadsheets and projections, and scenarios modelled out in detail.
And all three are stuck, completely paralysed, unable to make the decision, and their response to being stuck is the same thing every time: "I just need a bit more information."
More research about withdrawal rates, more data about market returns, more analysis of different scenarios, more articles about retirement planning, more podcasts about whether they've got enough, more calculators to check the calculations they've already done five times.
Here's what I've realised watching this pattern play out over and over, more information is often exactly the wrong thing, it's not helping people make better decisions, it's making it harder to decide at all.

The analysis paralysis trap

There's a point where gathering information stops being useful and starts being avoidance, you're not researching to make a better decision, you're researching to delay making any decision.
Because as long as you're still gathering information, you can tell yourself you're being sensible, being thorough, being responsible, you're not ready to decide yet because you haven't got all the facts.
Except you'll never have all the facts, retirement planning is fundamentally uncertain, you don't know how long you'll live or what markets will do or what your spending will actually be or whether you'll get ill or what will happen.
And no amount of additional research will eliminate that uncertainty, you can read every article ever written about safe withdrawal rates, and you still won't know for certain that 5% will work for you specifically over the next 30 years.
So you end up in this loop where you keep seeking more information hoping it will give you certainty, it doesn't, so you seek even more information, and round and round you go never actually making the decision.
One of the people I spoke with this week has been "researching retirement" for three years, he's read dozens of books, listened to hundreds of podcast episodes, built multiple spreadsheet models, he probably knows more about retirement planning than most financial planners.
And he still can't decide whether to retire because he's convinced there's one more piece of information he needs, one more calculation to run, one more article to read that will finally give him the certainty he's looking for.

The gap between knowing and deciding

Here’s the bit I want you to sit with… the gap between having enough information to make a good decision and actually making the decision isn't an information gap, it's an emotional one.
You're not stuck because you don't have enough facts, you're stuck because retirement feels scary and uncertain and like stepping off a cliff, and no amount of data is going to make that feeling go away.
The spreadsheet says you're fine, you've stress tested it against market crashes and living to 100, you've modelled different spending scenarios and withdrawal strategies, the numbers work, you know they work.
But knowing the numbers work doesn't make you feel ready to actually stop working and start living off your savings, because that's not a numbers decision, it's a psychological transition and fundamental shift in how you see yourself and your relationship with money and security.
And seeking more information is a way of avoiding that emotional work, it's easier to read another article about withdrawal rates than to sit with the uncomfortable feeling of "I'm about to stop earning forever and that's terrifying."
I see this constantly, people who could retire comfortably but can't pull the trigger, and when I ask what's stopping them they say "I just want to be certain" but what they actually mean is "I want to not feel scared."
And more information won't fix that, no amount of research will eliminate the emotional discomfort of making a major life transition into unknown territory.

Information overload creating more anxiety

And here's where it gets worse, beyond a certain point, more information doesn't just fail to help, it actively makes things worse, it creates anxiety rather than reducing it.
Because every new article you read has a slightly different opinion, one says 6% is safe, another says 3.5% is better, someone else argues for dynamic withdrawal strategies, another person advocates for annuities, everyone's got different assumptions and different scenarios.
And instead of clarity, you end up with confusion, instead of certainty, you end up with more questions, instead of feeling ready to decide, you feel even more overwhelmed because you've got twelve different expert opinions telling you twelve different things.
One of the people I spoke with this week said "I've read so much about retirement planning that I'm now more confused than when I started. I thought more research would help, but it's just made me question everything."
And that's the paradox isn't it, seeking more information to reduce uncertainty often increases it because you discover all the ways experts disagree, all the scenarios you hadn't considered, all the variables you didn't account for.
So you end up less confident about your decision than you were before you started researching, and your response is to seek even more information hoping that will resolve the confusion, but it just creates more of it.

What actually helps

And here's what I've noticed with the people who actually do manage to make the decision and retire, it's not that they have more information or better data or more sophisticated analysis.
It's that they've recognised the decision isn't about information, it's about emotional readiness, and they've done the work to address that rather than hiding behind endless research.
They've sat with the discomfort of uncertainty instead of trying to research it away, they've acknowledged that retirement is scary and that's okay, they've accepted that they'll never have perfect certainty and they're making the decision anyway.
They've stopped trying to eliminate all risk through analysis and started asking "what level of risk can I live with" and "what would make me feel safe enough even without certainty."
And often what makes them feel safe enough isn't more information, it's emotional reassurance, it's building in buffers that make the anxious part of their brain calm down, it's having a plan for what they'll do if things go wrong, it's knowing they can adjust if needed.
The decision to retire isn't primarily an analytical one, it's an emotional one, and treating it like it's purely about having enough information just keeps you stuck in an endless research loop avoiding the actual psychological work.

The question

If you're stuck researching retirement, unable to make the decision, seeking more and more information, ask yourself honestly: what are you actually looking for?
Are you looking for facts you don't have, or are you looking for certainty that doesn't exist?
Are you researching to make a better decision, or are you researching to avoid making any decision?
What would you need to know to feel ready, and is that thing actually knowable, or are you asking for information that can't exist because the future is inherently uncertain?
Because if you're waiting for perfect certainty before you retire, if you're seeking that one piece of information that will eliminate all doubt, you'll be researching forever, that information doesn't exist, retirement is uncertain and no amount of analysis will change that.
The people who successfully retire aren't the ones with the most information, they're the ones who've accepted uncertainty and made the decision anyway, they've done enough research to know the numbers work, then they've addressed the emotional barriers rather than trying to research those away too.
So maybe the question isn't "what else do I need to know" but "what's the emotional work I'm avoiding by continuing to research," because that's probably where you're actually stuck.
 
Yes, emotions certainly play big part in decision making.
 
I learned long ago that good is good enough. 80-90% gets you there. 100% certainly drives you nuts
While I'm often struck with analysis paralysis, I was quite comfortable with 90% certainty on deciding to retire, mainly because I thought I would work a couple of more years in a different job.

That didn't happen because of the pandemic.
 
Sometimes hard decisions have deeper issues:

IMG_4778.jpeg
 
I think that article waaay overstates the "problem".

The main point is: if you don't have enough money and retirement income streams, you can examine your situation every which way and it's not going to work out safely. Well maybe with a 10% withdrawal rate but that's not "safely".

If you have a good handle on your basic+discretionary expenses and have been learning and managing your finances for the past decade+, then no paralysis...
 
I learned long ago that good is good enough. 80-90% gets you there. 100% certainly drives you nuts
The corollary to that IME is there are so many variable unknowns, planning is an exercise with an axe, not a scalpel. Expending hours and hours planning just isn't worth it - I know because I did it many years ago.

Anyone who is sweating a 10-20% discrepancy is completely wasting their time not to mention playing with fire if you're cutting it that close. If you're that close you could still end up living under a bridge eating cat food, but (historically) more likely you'll end up with more $ than you expected when all is said and done - but you can't know that until the end.

A good retirement financial plan has an ample safety factor, and contingency plans...
 
Seems to me the people that are stricken with analysis paralysis when it comes to retirement are the same ones that are paralyzed by it concerning other decisions they have to make.

I had engineers that worked for me in the past that were great technical engineers but the problem was they'd be late on every project trying to get to 100% certainty on every detail. Not a great trait in MegaCorp where timelines mattered. I stressed that they'd never be reprimanded getting to 85 or 90% then move into testing. But those that had that trait, were the same outside of work. What neighborhood should I live in, what car should I buy, what fund should I invest in? It goes on and on..........they'd end up doing nothing different because of the fear of dong something wrong or something they may regret later.

Would have never made it as trauma doctors in the ER.
 
Last edited:
Or in our case, there was no planning. We sold the business when my husband said he wanted to retire and got 3 offers within a month, through a broker. Once we were done, I simply turned my IRA into deferred income annuties to provide another source of guaranteed income. I knew we were spending about $300K a year before retirement because of a ton of frivolous spendings. I used to call it easy come, easy go. In the end everything has worked out and we have been retired for 10 years and it looks like we won't be running out of money.
 
As someone who optimizes much of what I do I never feel I have too much information. I stick to timelines but I rarely stop seeking more information up to and until that timeline dictates. Better safe than sorry.
 
What neighborhood should I live in, what car should I buy, what fund should I invest in? It goes on and on..........they'd end up doing nothing different because of the fear of dong something wrong or something they may regret later.
You've exquisitely described my own immediate predicament. While more or less at peace with my "Barista FIRE" strategy, I'm utterly beset with self-doubt about buying a house - and for how much, and in which neighborhood. Buy vs. rent calculators are all screaming to rent. But the money that would fund the house would be coming out of intermediate-term bond funds, whose potential CAGR is negative... meaning, that the opportunity cost incurred by buying is negative. But then we have the property taxes. And, do I really need a house? And so on.

However, it might be OK to be paralyzed in indecision, because the current situation is OK. Stasis is OK. Not optimal, but OK. It's better to abide a suboptimal situation than to blunder into a worse one, right? And when I think about a counterfactual... supposing that I'd bought a house 2-3 years ago - would I have genuinely been happier? Likely not... only at the margin.
 
You've exquisitely described my own immediate predicament. While more or less at peace with my "Barista FIRE" strategy, I'm utterly beset with self-doubt about buying a house - and for how much, and in which neighborhood. Buy vs. rent calculators are all screaming to rent. But the money that would fund the house would be coming out of intermediate-term bond funds, whose potential CAGR is negative... meaning, that the opportunity cost incurred by buying is negative. But then we have the property taxes. And, do I really need a house? And so on.

However, it might be OK to be paralyzed in indecision, because the current situation is OK. Stasis is OK. Not optimal, but OK. It's better to abide a suboptimal situation than to blunder into a worse one, right? And when I think about a counterfactual... supposing that I'd bought a house 2-3 years ago - would I have genuinely been happier? Likely not... only at the margin.
Sounds like this topic is you.
 
I think everyone should strive for a good retirement plan (not a great one), check your investments on a yearly basis and make changes if needed. Don't sweat the small stuff, because you can't control everything.
 
I think that article waaay overstates the "problem".

The main point is: if you don't have enough money and retirement income streams, you can examine your situation every which way and it's not going to work out safely. Well maybe with a 10% withdrawal rate but that's not "safely".

If you have a good handle on your basic+discretionary expenses and have been learning and managing your finances for the past decade+, then no paralysis...
I tend to agree with you. If someone has been tracking their expenses, factor in one time, lumpy expenses, then they should have an idea of what “their number” should be and turns deciding if they can retire from an emotional decision to a mathematical one.
There are other psychological factors people go through, but deciding if they can afford to retire shouldn’t be one.
 
Once the financial stuff was okay (less than 4% needed/year) I only waited until I no longer enjoyed the j*b. The moment I didn't, I pulled the plug (over a week-end - a long week-end).
 
There is no holy grail solution to a forever unknown. When you truly believe that you can’t tell the future self doubt is eliminated. Believing everyone else can but you is the problem.

One arranges their lifestyle to the resulting circumstances they had years to create. You then adapt to changes as your personal facts reveal themselves.

Your psychological makeup, good and bad luck and specifically to retirement funds, tools available in your investment tool box, is all you have to work with.
 
For us it was just math. Once we confirmed that our pensions and savings would be sufficient for day-day and our RV trip expenses it was just setting a date and give notice.
 
For us it was just math. Once we confirmed that our pensions and savings would be sufficient for day-day and our RV trip expenses it was just setting a date and give notice.
If it's "just math", then you're incredibly poised and level-headed. All that remains is to quantify (approximately) uncertainties in your models and to apply a factor of safety. That might mean something like a 3% withdrawal rate instead of the more standard 4%. Sure, we can quibble about uncertainty quantification and so on, but if it's just math, well then, the solution is... math.

Consider instead a neurotic person who understands that math well-enough, but isn't persuaded by it. Smith is looking at a withdrawal rate of 0.4%. That's zero point four percent. Yes? Pretty darn low, yes? Can Smith render a decision to retire? He can, if he is at all swayed by math. But he can't, if emotion overwhelms math, and emotion leads him into all sorts of loops of self-doubt.

And that's the problem with so much of our financial planning, retirement planning, house buying decisions (my earlier example) and so on. The analogy is something like anorexia. If you're anorexic, it isn't about stepping on the weight-scale anymore. It's not about fitting into your clothes or worry that you'll lose fidelity to your diet and eventually grow fat. It is, in a way, a disease. We can have a similar disease with money, whether it's a willingness to spend or to retire (early or not) or any other purchasing decision. We can be so "anorexic" about commitment to keep saving and investing, that our material lives waste away, like the anorexic's body wastes away. The solution isn't math, any more than the anorexic can be counseled with equations about metabolism and caloric content of food and the first law of thermodynamics.

I don't know what the solution is.. but if we are indeed sufficiently logical as to listen to the math, well then, we don't have a problem.
 
For us it was just math. Once we confirmed that our pensions and savings would be sufficient for day-day and our RV trip expenses it was just setting a date and give notice.
Isn't it "just math" for everyone? The analysis paralysis comes in because there are so many options for the math.

I recall my thinking just before I started looking into retirement in earnest, and the answer seemed as simple as "4%" or 25x expenses. Then I discovered all the different planning tools that all gave slightly different answers, and all their various inputs. I try to keep in mind the adage someone alluded to above: You measure your inputs with the proverbial micrometer and do the math on them, then execute the plan with the proverbial axe because in reality all the precision is swamped by randomness.
 
And that's the problem with so much of our financial planning, retirement planning, house buying decisions (my earlier example) and so on. The analogy is something like anorexia. If you're anorexic, it isn't about stepping on the weight-scale anymore. It's not about fitting into your clothes or worry that you'll lose fidelity to your diet and eventually grow fat. It is, in a way, a disease. We can have a similar disease with money, whether it's a willingness to spend or to retire (early or not) or any other purchasing decision. We can be so "anorexic" about commitment to keep saving and investing, that our material lives waste away, like the anorexic's body wastes away. The solution isn't math, any more than the anorexic can be counseled with equations about metabolism and caloric content of food and the first law of thermodynamics.
Well said, Dio. Great analogy.
 
Isn't it "just math" for everyone? The analysis paralysis comes in because there are so many options for the math.

I recall my thinking just before I started looking into retirement in earnest, and the answer seemed as simple as "4%" or 25x expenses. Then I discovered all the different planning tools that all gave slightly different answers, and all their various inputs. I try to keep in mind the adage someone alluded to above: You measure your inputs with the proverbial micrometer and do the math on them, then execute the plan with the proverbial axe because in reality all the precision is swamped by randomness.
The decision to RE for me was pretty easy because, frankly, I wasn't sure I'd live long enough to retire at any age. My dad passed at 48 and his brothers all died early albeit later than 48. Never knew my paternal lineage beyond dad and his brothers. So the decision to RE was EZ and then the actual planning...the math...began in my early 40's. The fact that I'll be retired for 21-yrs in August is a bit mind-boggling. I'm thankful but surprised. Apparently I have my mother's genes. Mom made it to 88 and her mom made it to 92.
 
The ONLY thing that you know for certain about ANY plan is that it WILL be wrong.
Where I worked (for a public Electric Utility) we did 20 year forecasting. It was merely a GUIDELINE on what MIGHT happen. YMMV
Yes. Planning keeps you from making gross errors. Then, the rest depends on fine tuning and tweaking in the implementation phase.
 
Back
Top Bottom