I agree. Dollars and percentages matter. When I am helping a young person with a $20K portfolio, or someone with a $250K portfolio, they don't get the same advice. I'm 95% equities and like it that way. I rarely focus on dollars when making decisions, but that is because I don't need to given the size of our portfolio and the income that comes from dividends and options.
View attachment 64767
The following image includes UTMA accounts for five grandchildren and an account I manage for my brother-in-law. The total is greater than the number shown above.
View attachment 64768
The only time the dollar amount really matters is after you've accumulated several million dollars. At that point, your asset allocation (AA) becomes much less important.
For example, suppose you have a $5 million portfolio and spend $100,000 per year. Even keeping the entire portfolio in CDs is enough to meet your spending needs.
The only meaningful way to compare, learn about, and discuss investment strategies is by evaluating their performance or, better yet, their risk-adjusted returns.
I posted other comments too.
Asset Allocations - Percentages vs Dollar Amount
Members talk about allocation percentages all the time on here. What is overlooked in my opinion is the actual value vs a percentage. If someone has 80% equities with a $3m portfolio = $2.4m in stocks If someone had 40% equities with $10m = $4m in stocks I understand percentages will be an...
Asset Allocations - Percentages vs Dollar Amount
AA is expressed in percentages because the point of the AA is to manage risk level of the portfolio. It doesn't matter how much money is involved. An 80/20 portfolio has a different risk level than a 30/70 portfolio. Once you're retired, and maybe before that, you may choose to adjust your AA...