I may not even understand what I am getting at. It falls under the adage that "one does not know what they do not know".IMO yes, the highest yielding ones. Perhaps I misunderstand what you are trying to get at, but if the after tax percentage is what you keep, obviously (say) 78% of $10,000 is better than 78% of $7,000.
Regards, Dick
I think that @COcheesehead hit on my thinking, such that ROC is not taxable. But, I am not entirely sure what other factors might come into play.
I think that I will be building more assets in taxable, as I draw from tax-deferred, and do not need all of the income. My choices seems to be equities, cash or maybe CEFs. I will likely employ all of these.
I totally agree with your thinking that generally the more income one earns, the better, regardless of the taxes. This is something that I have always embraced, and why I have never quite understood accepting much lower income, just to save on taxes. Particularly, in the "lower" tax brackets.
Obviously, there are other considerations, such as IRMAA, then NIIT, should one's MAGI rise to that level. I am just getting ready to start retirement, so this is still a work in progress.
As usual, I welcome constructive dialogue, even dissenting. I also think that there are others to whom this all may apply.
Last edited: