CEF Holdings --- June 2026

For HY bonds and our Pimcos to do well and NAVs to rise, we need a “goldilocks” environment where growth is positive and reasonably solid, inflation is moderate or gently declining, and Fed is on hold or starting to ease rather than aggressively tightening.
Today, economic growth is accelerating but inflation is rising and rates are predicted to rise due to strong labor (growth) and inflation. But I think inflation is due to the oil volatility driven by the conflict. Once this resolves and oil prices come down, I think inflation will stabilize and come down and rates will be on hold. That environment, dependent on conflict resolution, will be optimal for HY bonds and factor in as a tailwind for our bondish CEFs, as per the correlation I showed above.
My takeaway on this post? Things are not going to get better until after the FED raises rates or we get solid confirmation that they are not raising rates. Which may not be until Jan 2027.

And this has been my base case for months. Traders will of course trade. But B&H will feel squeamish.
 
It really seems markets have become "bored" or at least generally unresponsive to crude, conflict, obvious inflation effects. It's really hard to anticipate what comes next. Anyhow, my last little PDI bid is at 16.52.
Regards, Dick
Yep, everything eventually becomes the "new normal".
 
Bought two inverse positions today (EPV for Europe) and RWM for Russell2000, bringing my protective downside bets to almost 10% of port value. Single biggest position is MINT, by far. I see nothing on my indicators to be optimistic about, not even gold with its accelerating decline. Preferreds also in steady nosedive as you might expect after the CPI numbers. PDI slipped to 16.52 --- hm -- almost exactly at its late March low. NOW what?. Retain near zero in equities.

Has WDI slump gone too far? Watching it now, but still no buy.

Market may be "bored" but I'm not. Want to see how these trends develop. -- or reverse.
 
Last edited:
My takeaway on this post? Things are not going to get better until after the FED raises rates or we get solid confirmation that they are not raising rates. Which may not be until Jan 2027.

And this has been my base case for months. Traders will of course trade. But B&H will feel squeamish.
If you are a B&H investor AND reinvest all or part of your dividends, things are good now, though not optimal: bondish Pimcos TR NAVs are on a trend up, as are Hy bonds. In the chart below, I show PDI NAV (blue). As long as it stays above its 200 day MA (orange line), its trend is UP. Below: DOWN. Same for the HYG (HY Bond Index). Above 200 MA, UP (as it is now). below down. The faded red chart is the PDI price. I faded it to show how it just looks like a cloud of noise around the PDI NAV, whose trend is the signal you need to track.
But if you are just consuming all dividends now and don't reinvest, you are facing a down trend in NAV and Price.
In the optimal "goldilocks" I described above, the HY bonds index and correlated Pimco's CEFs NAVs will still go up, even if the B&H investor consumes all dividends, and assuming non-destructive ROC, driven by the macro factors I mentioned.
Finally, in a previous post I made a simulation showing how much you need to re-invest in today's market to keep the NAV from eroding.

1781127241326.png
 
All good to know. I am basically a B&H investor. I am reinvesting, for now. I have acquired as prices fell.
Thanks for the chart work and explanation.
 
All good to know. I am basically a B&H investor. I am reinvesting, for now. I have acquired as prices fell.
Thanks for the chart work and explanation.
Another interesting thing in the chart I showed is that it validates the PDI NAV beta vs HYG calculation I showed before. In english, :) , how much does PDI go up or down for every +/- 1% in HYG. The regression chart (line) I showed calculated a 1.81 beta, almost 2 x HYG return, up or down, that is. And looking at the chart above, you see that, for the period posted PDI NAV returned 127% to HYG's 59%, very close to the measured beta. Also, for correlation, which was very strong, at about 0.9, you can visually see that in the chart, with every uptrend and every correction in HYG is perfectly matched in PDI.
 
Friendly mod note:
There have been quite a few posts in this thread reported for being off topic. Please be aware that this is NOT a violation of the Community Rules, and thread drift is completely normal. It's something best dealt with by the other commenters in the thread, and it's usually a waste of time to report.
Thanks for your understanding.
 
My takeaway on this post? Things are not going to get better until after the FED raises rates or we get solid confirmation that they are not raising rates. Which may not be until Jan 2027.

And this has been my base case for months. Traders will of course trade. But B&H will feel squeamish.
You’re an optimist. I’ve seem this too many times before. I’ll game this unknown at least 4 years because no one really cares about the general population except around national elections and first terms.

That makes me grumpy geezer. Some level of CEF cash still flows though.
 
You’re an optimist. I’ve seem this too many times before. I’ll game this unknown at least 4 years because no one really cares about the general population except around national elections and first terms.

That makes me grumpy geezer. Some level of CEF cash still flows though.
I figure not until Jan 2027- at the earliest - for CEFs. Not that optimistic. Meanwhile, I also own equities and bond oefs and believe that time horizon could be entirely different. And all of that is assuming that no new variables enter into the equation. Or that the wind direction doesn't change. lol
 
Last edited:
I figure not until Jan 2027- at the earliest - for CEFs. Not that optimistic. Meanwhile, I also own equities and bond oefs and believe that time horizon could be entirely different. And all of that is assuming that no new variables enter into the equation. Or that the wind direction doesn't change. lol

I also have VTI, conventional bonds and since “I think” I’m good a growing cash horde. When my personal needs change I’ll go right to CEF’s solving the problem by the next month.

I don’t think there’s a bad market period since 2009 when I started investing in CEF’s where they have failed me.
 
It really seems markets have become "bored" or at least generally unresponsive to crude, conflict, obvious inflation effects. It's really hard to anticipate what comes next. Anyhow, my last little PDI bid is at 16.52.
Regards, Dick
It looks like PDI will be trading somewhere b/t 16.30---16.00.
Tomorrow & Fri. will determine whether or not to lower my window, which is 17.00---17.50.
16.30--16.00, though seems likely. If it goes lower than 16.30, i will nibble.
 
Hi. If you like it at 16.50, why not buy it at (for example) 16.70 today. You'll own PDI at 16.48 tomorrow and have 22c coming. Ie. Why give away the djstribution?
I just did a set it and forget it at a lower price, expecting the CPI, shenanigans, and ex div to do my thinking for me. In fact I may drop it to $16.40 before tomorrow. Every penny counts.
 
I just did a set it and forget it at a lower price, expecting the CPI, shenanigans, and ex div to do my thinking for me. In fact I may drop it to $16.40 before tomorrow. Every penny counts.
I thought about your comment. I was traveling yesterday and could not get on my account. I just canceled the order overnight and will wait for a lower entry price. The divi is less important than a buy low entry price if I am going to try and buy and hold. That was the mistake I made on my first purchase. I got impatient and bought at a higher entry price. I exited with a 1% loss across my PIMCOs. Trying to be smarter this time, as I don’t want to jump in and out.
 
I thought about your comment. I was traveling yesterday and could not get on my account. I just canceled the order overnight and will wait for a lower entry price. The divi is less important than a buy low entry price if I am going to try and buy and hold. That was the mistake I made on my first purchase. I got impatient and bought at a higher entry price. I exited with a 1% loss across my PIMCOs. Trying to be smarter this time, as I don’t want to jump in and out.
I did buy some PDI yesterday before the price went down towards the end of the session. I'm ok with that, however, as I know some of that will be reflected in my increased income at the next payment and over time. Some may disagree with my thinking, but when I look at my "losers" one factor I look at is the income they produce over time compared to the unrealized capital loss at that point. If the income is greater than the loss, I'm willing to hold. Low-yielding dividend stocks are a different story...
 
I did buy some PDI yesterday before the price went down towards the end of the session. I'm ok with that, however, as I know some of that will be reflected in my increased income at the next payment and over time. Some may disagree with my thinking, but when I look at my "losers" one factor I look at is the income they produce over time compared to the unrealized capital loss at that point. If the income is greater than the loss, I'm willing to hold. Low-yielding dividend stocks are a different story...
+1. In the case of PDI the dividend difference between buying at $17 or buying at $15.5 is 1.5% annually.

Personally, not a number that I lose sleep over.
 
I tendered my JOF shares. Added to RMMZ/RFMZ/MFM in munis, Added to FSSL in taxables.

I'm not sold that the yields will go materially higher - though I do think the 10yr could move back to 5.0% - so much as the yield curve flattens. That could crimp spread earning. Still there's value in 5% tax-free coupon bonds and I've bought quite a few from my state. That said, I needed to deploy more and will use muni CEFs whenever I do. Better than cash.

The model we use seems to work. Top funds picked last year have the top NAV Tr. AFB, NBH, VFL, DSM, RFMZ, FMN, MHD. Still holding most of those shares despite buying indiv state munis.
 
I tendered my JOF shares. Added to RMMZ/RFMZ/MFM in munis, Added to FSSL in taxables.

I'm not sold that the yields will go materially higher - though I do think the 10yr could move back to 5.0% - so much as the yield curve flattens. That could crimp spread earning. Still there's value in 5% tax-free coupon bonds and I've bought quite a few from my state. That said, I needed to deploy more and will use muni CEFs whenever I do. Better than cash.

The model we use seems to work. Top funds picked last year have the top NAV Tr. AFB, NBH, VFL, DSM, RFMZ, FMN, MHD. Still holding most of those shares despite buying indiv state munis.
IMO a 5% 10yr is far more likely to result from curve STEEPENING --- unless one believes Fed will hike its policy rate by 75-100 bps.
Regards, Dick
 
I tendered my JOF shares. Added to RMMZ/RFMZ/MFM in munis, Added to FSSL in taxables.

I'm not sold that the yields will go materially higher - though I do think the 10yr could move back to 5.0% - so much as the yield curve flattens. That could crimp spread earning. Still there's value in 5% tax-free coupon bonds and I've bought quite a few from my state. That said, I needed to deploy more and will use muni CEFs whenever I do. Better than cash.

The model we use seems to work. Top funds picked last year have the top NAV Tr. AFB, NBH, VFL, DSM, RFMZ, FMN, MHD. Still holding most of those shares despite buying indiv state munis.
I got some unpleasant surprises on some of my TE Muni CEFs at tax time last year because turns out they were doing ROC distributions in spite of CEF Connect indicating the distributions were all from income. I have found more than a few of these distribution characterization errors on CEF Connect so now double check the fund management website Section 19 notices before purchasing new holdings.

I don't really see much point to owning a Tax-Exempt Muni CEF that isn't distributing a high percentage as income because anything else is eventually taxed and you could have done better in Taxable Munis or Corporates......ex. RFMZ distributions are 73% ROC and RMMZ is 82%.
 
I got some unpleasant surprises on some of my TE Muni CEFs at tax time last year because turns out they were doing ROC distributions in spite of CEF Connect indicating the distributions were all from income. I have found more than a few of these distribution characterization errors on CEF Connect so now double check the fund management website Section 19 notices before purchasing new holdings.

I don't really see much point to owning a Tax-Exempt Muni CEF that isn't distributing a high percentage as income because anything else is eventually taxed and you could have done better in Taxable Munis or Corporates......ex. RFMZ distributions are 73% ROC and RMMZ is 82%.
Consider also checking out cefdata.com for a rich source of data/analytics on CEFs AND BDCs. D
 
+1. In the case of PDI the dividend difference between buying at $17 or buying at $15.5 is 1.5% annually.

Personally, not a number that I lose sleep over.
That is a great way to look at it! If interested in income and aware it will fluctuate. It is hard for some of us to adapt to that thinking, when used to growing a portfolio. Thanks.
 
+1. In the case of PDI the dividend difference between buying at $17 or buying at $15.5 is 1.5% annually.

Personally, not a number that I lose sleep over.
Not very good at math, but for the same dollar amount invested, I believe it is closer to 10%.
 
Not very good at math, but for the same dollar amount invested, I believe it is closer to 10%.
My math skills are probably worse than yours but here's my logic:

$100k @ $17 ps is 5888 shares X .2205 = $1297 per month
$100k @ $15.5 ps is 6452 shares X .2205 = $1432 per mo.
Difference of $126 per month or $1506 annual dividends.
$1506÷ 100,000=1.506%
The name of the game is income not how many shares I've bought.
But I could be wrong....willing to stand corrected.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ozz
Back
Top Bottom