All in a taxable account?UTF, HQH, ASGI, HTD, EOS, CSQ, RQI, GAB, DNP, PDI, UTG, THQ, LGI, ADX. These represent about 40% of my PV.
Sitting on small gains on RMM, NEA and NVG. RMM up 2.5% today so far.Some people have reported success with the muni CEFs, but I think that is based on entry point. My experience with them was a net small loss and in retrospect would have been a bigger loss had I held longer than I did.
Some funds have a slight total return as of late above their distribution. That might be considered a success.
After the recent downturn, the entry point might be attractive again for those willing to jump in now.
Not a recommendation. Just an observation.
Yes. Although I hold similar, and some of the same, in my tax advantaged a/cs.All in a taxable account?
Hi Ozz, I don't like this fund. It has zero track record, so difficult to crunch numbers. It's price has spiked recently, so it's expensive relative to its peers. And, the yield of 0.59% is less than the individual holdings! It owns 30 issues.YYYM, a CEF Muni Fund of funds ~ anyone have any thoughts or insights on this relatively new ETF?
You reminded me of a silly thing that happened the last time (for obvious reasons to come) I made a trade on my phone. I was patiently waiting in line for an In 'N Out burger. I was so engrossed in the mechanics, my car moved forward 6 inches and gently nudged the car in front. That cost me $600.00 (no ins. involved) and I resolved to not let that highly expensive trade experience happen again. Stay healthy, my friend.Missing in action today getting scanned and bled and poked at Dana Farber in first post-surgical checkup. The docs gave themselves an A+ and me an A-okay.
Luckily, on the oil news, I added to a number of positions before the open and added more later in a waiting room on my daughter's computer.
That aside, many bondish CEFs appear to have broken up out of lengthy consolidation patterns on the drop in oil prices. Of course, news and energy prices can change rapidly, but chances favor a continuation of CEF prices upward for at least a while. Cash down to about 15%.
Regards, Dick
@schrodingerscat thanks for your reply. It is not that I prefer the YYYM type of fund, at my age I am just trying to simplify investments in the event of .....Hi Ozz, I don't like this fund. It has zero track record, so difficult to crunch numbers. It's price has spiked recently, so it's expensive relative to its peers. And, the yield of 0.59% is less than the individual holdings! It owns 30 issues.
Have you looked at VTEB, $42B in AUM, 3.36% yield? (VTEB distributions are all exempt from AMT.) It owns over 9900 issues.
Also, check out FLMI, aum $2B, yielding 3.9%. Lastly, I just found two worth doing some DD: CGMU and CGHM, both yielding over 3%. Hope you are well and happy!
Is their a reason you prefer a fund over individual issues? I understand if the answer is yes. I own SGOV for my cash allocation instead of the usual treasury zeros.
Did similar today. I received a “stable” which seems about a C+. Missing in action today getting scanned and bled and poked at Dana Farber in first post-surgical checkup. The docs gave themselves an A+ and me an A-okay.
Luckily, on the oil news, I added to a number of positions before the open and added more later in a waiting room on my daughter's computer.
That aside, many bondish CEFs appear to have broken up out of lengthy consolidation patterns on the drop in oil prices. Of course, news and energy prices can change rapidly, but chances favor a continuation of CEF prices upward for at least a while. Cash down to about 15%.
Regards, Dick
Happy to hear that good health report!Missing in action today getting scanned and bled and poked at Dana Farber in first post-surgical checkup. The docs gave themselves an A+ and me an A-okay.
Luckily, on the oil news, I added to a number of positions before the open and added more later in a waiting room on my daughter's computer.
That aside, many bondish CEFs appear to have broken up out of lengthy consolidation patterns on the drop in oil prices. Of course, news and energy prices can change rapidly, but chances favor a continuation of CEF prices upward for at least a while. Cash down to about 15%.
Regards, Dick
Take good care Dick we want you healthy!Missing in action today getting scanned and bled and poked at Dana Farber in first post-surgical checkup. The docs gave themselves an A+ and me an A-okay.
Luckily, on the oil news, I added to a number of positions before the open and added more later in a waiting room on my daughter's computer.
That aside, many bondish CEFs appear to have broken up out of lengthy consolidation patterns on the drop in oil prices. Of course, news and energy prices can change rapidly, but chances favor a continuation of CEF prices upward for at least a while. Cash down to about 15%.
Regards, Dick
I am with you on the PIMCOs. Too many up days in a row. Bad news Monday plus ex div = lower entry price.I started a new position in KIO (ex tmo) near the close today. Had the buy order in for 2k shares and right at the close, I got filled with 44 shares. Guess I'll sell them tomorrow and lock in my $5.34 dividendMay grab a PIMCO tmo for ex on Monday. Not too fond of the recent rise in PDI so may buy PHK which appears to be fairly stable in price lately.
Here is how all these technical/fundamental indicators looked at the end of 2007, at the beginning of the GFC, to indicate the incoming recession & crisis. See also how the bull market resumed in mid 2009:
View attachment 63452
stefansm - Are you suggesting the markers are there for an impending 2007 like crash/reset?
Not clear from your wording in these messages but the green arrows on your 2026 graph looks reminiscent of 2007 green arrows.
pwf
Long term bong rates spooking upward (and down again)... NMI has 86+% maturities greater than 15 years.What is going on with NMI price swings the last few days?
Thanks!Long term bong rates spooking upward (and down again)... NMI has 86+% maturities greater than 15 years.
...AFTER a 40% drawdown from 2007 high... and took 4 more years to cross that '07 high. Just sayin....See also how the bull market resumed in mid 2009:
The point I am making, and which may have been lost, is that in December 2007, all the 4 indicators I show turned red (see the chart). This was enough evidence to tell you that a bear market or a big correction is coming....AFTER a 40% drawdown from 2007 high... and took 4 more years to cross that '07 high. Just sayin.
THIS , ^, exactly! I am sorry that I missed that part of the earlier post. If I had had the market health tools I have now back then it would have saved me almost 10 years of 401K contributions. Thanks for the great posts! -FCThe point I am making, and which may have been lost, is that in December 2007, all the 4 indicators I show turned red (see the chart). This was enough evidence to tell you that a bear market or a big correction is coming.
So, you act on it and protect your portfolio. This means you get out of risk assets and stay in cash or re-allocate to managed futures or to treasury bonds (cause inflation was falling, fast, so treasuries were great as the safe assets) or you use options to hedge your portfolio or whatever you usually do when you know that a bear market is coming.