Me, too. But sometimes easier to say than do.My idea of the future is playing with my grandkids and watching them grow up. I’ve learned to not worry about things I can’t control.
I would tell you that I am not making plans for a lifespan beyond age 90. On the other hand, I’m stopping to see my 92 year old uncle and his wife in England next week.Of course, I've optimistically set my financial plan to expire at age 99 which is still several years off. So if I get lucky (unlucky?) and live that long, I may indeed be right in the middle of whatever develops in the economic world. YMMV
I'm old enough to remember the George Jetson cartoons - "Brutal, I had to push the button on and off five times. - That Spacely is a slave driver."I think the next step in American economic evolution is the complete automation of industries using robots. I think this would've happened naturally at some point, but tariffs or whatever might accelerate this move to robotic labor.
Ray Dalio is extremely smart, but he also says a lot of things. As does Jamie Dimon, Bill Ackman, , etc etcRay Dalio has been around the block a few times. He voiced his opinions on Meet the Press today.
As do I..When Dalio speaks out, I tend to keep a watchful eye on what he says.
But he’s called nine of the last six recessions!As do I..
I watched what he said in 2015 when he made headlines predicting a 1937 scenario of markets plunging and it didn't happen
I watched what he said in 2017 when he said the market was going down because of the Feds moves...didn't happen
I watched in 2019 when he said recession was coming.....actually Covid happened to be fair, but without it there was def no recession.....
in 2022 he said we were looking at a "perfect storm" coming for the market.....2023 and 2024 were banner years.....
So again, i would be dubious of changing my asset allocation because "Ray Dalio saId......."
Good call. No one talks much about their error rates irrespective of their business acumen.Ray Dalio is extremely smart, but he also says a lot of things. As does Jamie Dimon, Bill Ackman, , etc etc
They're often wrong with their predictions as well , but their comments make tantalizing headlines that stir the pot. I'm not going to make my long term investment plans on their tweets of the day.
I know (or knew) 2 men and 4 women who made it to or beyond 100! Amazingly, their health held pretty well until the last few months of their lives.I would tell you that I am not making plans for a lifespan beyond age 90. On the other hand, I’m stopping to see my 92 year old uncle and his wife in England next week.
My mom passed at 101 last november.I know (or knew) 2 men and 4 women who made it to or beyond 100! Amazingly, their health held pretty well until the last few months of their lives.
I know lots of colorful metaphors.My mom passed at 101 last november.
For our future it might be a good idea to learn Chinese. Well after i master English, lol.
Shorter term there will be ups and down, this tarriff saga will nudge towards faster automation. And about bringing production back onshore, factories will comeback but still there may be widespread job losses as both mental n physical work will automate. And if this happens, current events will be a small blip compred to new turmoil.I’ll go even further and say AI-enhanced robots are going to work already and the combination of infinite intelligence + infinite labor run 24/7 will be transforming all aspects of economic and personal life in ways we can’t yet fathom. My bet is we’ll have explosive productivity growth and it will be deflationary on prices. I don’t think the transformation will be thanks to tariffs, nor limited to America. Sounds crazy but those are my cards on the table.
I'm not sure I understand why the 4% rule is under pressure due to AI explosion.4% rule should be relooked in context of longer lifespan and economic system changes due to possible AI explosion.
Yes indeed. It is much easier to have or offer a rosy outlook when that outlook isn’t specific and can’t be measured.Some comments make me think the definition of Gilded Age may vary among readers.
I wish I could believe that but all the evidence is to the contrary. All I've seen are claims of waste/fraud cuts that have turned out to not be true and calls for huge tax cuts. So spending isn't decreasing and tax revenue will shrink. That's not a recipe for reigning in the deficit.The limitless-borrow-and-spend party may be ending but there are good times yet to come.
Some comments make me think the definition of Gilded Age may vary among readers.
I usually come away from these type of discussions with ambivalence since both extremes are essentially trying to convince me that the opposite view is evil.Yes indeed. It is much easier to have or offer a rosy outlook when that outlook isn’t specific and can’t be measured.