Deciding between high comp in office job vs Remote

kirby

Dryer sheet wannabe
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
11
Location
USA
Hi Everyone,

I wanted to share some math and really weigh brand equity and high comp to floating on and leaving money on the table but embracing a lcol lifestyle and full remote.

The numbers aren't magic and pretty basic, I floated my resume to a few places, got referred to some more and I got back 3 offers. The market is still hiring for top roles, but I do agree the lower end of the spectrum of jobs does not seem to have movement nor great comp structures.

My work isn't particularly exciting but it pays well and is in Tech. This one place that gave me an offer has great brand equity at the cost of no remote, but 100% bonus and a great title to boot. Let's call it InvestmentBank#1 and the location, let's say Pacific North West. My age? Let's say I'm right in the middle of my 30's.

InvestmentBank#1 like all Investment Banks hands out lofty titles. Feels good, looks good, would be nice to have a business card with it. LinkedIn would be great. Let's say I'm near the top pay band at 250K, with possible 80% bonus paid out based on performance. Said IB plays many games with the bonus but generally the director is rewarded for handing out more bonuses because it shows they are hiring high performers/hitting right metrics. They pro-rate, so lets say if I were to join in June, 250K + 100k = 350K total comp.

That number sounds fantastic, and 20's me would've loved it. But some pocket math:

Gross W2Federal Income TaxSS/MedicareTotal TaxTax RateNet
250,000$51,000$17,600$68,60027.4%$181,400
350,000$85,000$22,900$107,90030.8%$242,100

Ouch! While I'm sure I could file a schedule c and get some expenses deducted from an itemized return, that's a game I don't want to play so, my thinking projection was:

Monthly projected expenses:

ItemMonthlyYearly
Rent$2,000$24,000 (Floor cost, can go higher, easily.)
Car, NEW 4runner$1000$12,000 (includes gas,parking,monthly, car note, etc.)
Groceries/Utilities$500$6000


Grand total: $42,000 , Ouch!

The car is a non-needed purchase, I have a unreasonable 2 seater convertible that is perfect to me in everyway, but is highly inconvinent half the year in the PNW, so a 4runner, would be nice and my excuse is safer then driving a small, rwd, convertible on snowy highways and hoping I won't roll backwards on steep hills. 9 years of doing that and no issue, but a new car would be nice.

Tax Sheltering on 250K:

Bucket/TypeAmount
401(k) $24,500
HSA$4,400
Backdoor Roth IRA (After tax?)$7,500
Roth IRA$7,500

So Cash Impact:

ItemAnnually
Net after taxes, no shelters$181,000
Less 401k+HSA-$28,900
Tax savings from 401k+HSA+$8,000
Less from Tax Mega backdoor-$15,000
Less Backdoor Roth IRA-$7,500
Net net Cash$138,000

From $250,000. The end result becomes $138,000 and then from that to subtract $42,000 from the bare essentials above.

$96,000 true net.

The 401k 72k limit may be uncapped, but unsure, so ran the numbers above. capping it what the 401k plan may be.

And it's a bit depressing, It's great base pay, but the need to go to the office everyday to be at a hot desk where everyone else is located in different geographic offices seems like a joke. If the role was fully remote, it'd be different. And of course being with what the title says, probably 8-10 hour days.

Meanwhile, Remote. I have steady income and can do a similar W2 role if I so desire, from another offer that is open to being geographically remote/world wide because they have local offices.

Typical my offers for remote are $125,000-175,000, and depending on the type of work if it isn't w2, it can be c2c, it can be Part time as well. I have one with a retainer that I currently have (and would be keeping if I were to take the in office job) which is exciting, but granted I have not currently been maximizing my investments properly/exposed them to the market which means I am losing quite a bit. I could do another table for the above, but going 50% from the above numbers puts it at a base comp remote job of $125k which is average and accurate enough.


The biggest thing when doing geographic arbitrage is just true maximizing savings and lower cost of living. I personally believe the USA is an expensive place to be in.

For example:

That $2000 apartment, is abotu 500-600sq ft, location convinient, but then tack on $300 for utilities, power/water/internet. Nothing extravagent, then a parking spot, lets say $200. It becomes $2500 quick, or $30,000 annually.

My go to place has been Japan/Vietnam/Indonesia, it runs similar for Philippines, Thailand, Malayasia and China.

Average 600sq ft condo in those places run less than $1000, new luxury, and would be 600-800sq ft. Philippines and Bali, Indonesia would skew highest, while Vietnam would skew lowest, with HCMC D1/D3 being around $500/600 a month, Hanoi slightly cheaper. Houses are also possible, and better value and go from the same rate with 800-1500 sq ft normally in the right "expat" locations. Go outside the main city business districts, they can reduce by 25-60% easily. Thats just one exampl that rings true for most of South East Asia. For Japan/China, apartments and houses were for the longest time not considered investments but there is Tier 1 city pricing like Shanghai/Beijing and Tokyo vs tier 2 cities and so on - but a new apartment, 700-900 sq ft (in asia, 60sqm is the norm, 30sqm is considered micro apartment and no fun, so 60sqm = 650 square feet., families start living in around 90-120sqm.

What about taxation and such: Great question, there are digital nomad visas that escape taxation for Thailand, Malayasia and Indonesia. Japan is structured differently but if you enter on a visa waiver, you can work provided you don't make income in the country - this is a valid question that I'll write about in another thread if people are truly interested in tax harvesting/sheltering and avoiding liability while doing this.

Overall the real estate cost, lets say $9,600 annually which is a very generous cost that is above most local population affordability but you are getting the new of the new and prime convience spots in all of those countries. It hits the average GDP per capita which is also another interesting thing to note: That you can find cheaper if you really want too.

The other costs, really, become more inconsequential, food you can practically eat out for that budget or spend half on groceries for fresh produce/farm, etc.

The car of course also goes out of the picture, while cool, not really needed - hired cars/taxis are more affordable, 25% of the car budget is whats needed for true convience and eliminating the capex/opex projected for the in office job. But, no cool 4runner.

But then comes in the true cost: Is being remote and always known as an Remote Engineer in tech and, sadly more replacable worth the temporary freedom vs a few years in a higher comp role with good brand/equity/alumni network and a title that can potentially have more upward mobility if so wanted to be in a corporate life?

The facetime I do think pays a difference, but also I don't have an endgame decided yet:

I don't think theres a true victory to be a company man, I've never had a promotion, I've always left a role for one with better title and salary or been cut/laid off/fired, lol and writing your own exit by maximizing savings rate, and not being depedent on a company is much better, but I do hear stories of people who did commit and get a substanial package.

But, I also do feel I'm lazy - not in the sense of learning, interpreting and trying to find the best path but corporate jobs really seem hollow and empty. It's been over 8 years since I've actually had to go to an office job on a daily basis and even then I was able to fanangle doing a few days a month in office and remote.

And living abroad in Asia is just night and day difference to living in the USA. It does get old/exhausting after a bit but I've found so much opportunity there and my network of friends is there that really, ironically, rejecting a 250K base pay offer seem reasonable.
 
At a glance you cannot contribute to Roth IRA because the income limit is $153K for single filers. Backdoor IRA may or may not be available with employer 1 401K plan.

I have no comments on which job you should accept. For me, when I was in my 30s and 40s, the sky was the limit in climbing the corporate ladder. I would do whatever that was needed, travel, work 16 hour days and 7 days a week. I was posted as as an expat, condo, car and chauffeur all paid for, plus cost of living and hardship allowance. I would accept that in a heartbeat if I were to be in the workforce again in my 30s/40s.
 
Stop stressing over the money and choose what your heart desires. The money will follow.
 
When do you want to be able to retire?

If it's sooner rather than later, suck it up and take the higher paying job. If you're in no rush to RE, take the job you think you'll enjoy more.
 
TLDR. But I think it depends on whether you're playing the long game or the short game.

Remote workers are measured by their numbers, but are often out-of-sight-out-of-mind.

In-office have the benefit of visibility, networking, contacts and an ability to demonstrate "intangibles" that often lead to recognition and promotions.

I was responsible for a dozen offices worldwide and the people at HQ definitely had an edge, however the remotes had a higher tolerance for mediocre performance.
 
Respectfully, I think your analysis focuses too much on the near term.

Which opportunity aligns most closely with your longer term career objectives?

That would lead me most.
 
+1 If you have never worked in investment banking at the director level, don't underestimate that it is a total time suck from what I have observed... you are on call 24/7/365 and work long hours doing what looked to me as fairly boring and unfulfilling work helping the rich get richer.

While your fairly well into your career, I generally advise to not worry about the money and select jobs that provide the best experience. Later in your career, once you have accumulated that great experience then you cash it in for a nice high level corporate job.

I worked remotely during the last 13 years of my career but think it is important to spend at least some time in the office to have some face time with bosses and colleagues. Since we were geographically dispersed if was before video calling, there were numerous colleagues that I would work with via call and email and develop a good working relationship with and then meet later at a practice meeting and would think "Whoa, that isn't what I had in mind!" (and I suspect vice versa).
 
Are you looking for your next job or continuing your career? If this is the end of the road to coast for 5 years you pick one door, if this needs to be a springboard for something better later, you pick another.

Given choices, it's rarely about the numbers, but the work, the role, the company. And the remote job is the one to coast and end things.
 
Those choices are miles apart, so you have much to consider. Whatever you choose, think about the next step, whether that step is your choice or your employer’s. This is especially important when considering relocating and potentially purchasing property in a foreign country. Yes, the U.S. is expensive, but I wouldn’t make a decision to move to another country on that factor alone, especially when you have an option for a $250k+ income.

You say your work is in tech but then use an example of investment banking. Either way, both of those fields move fast when it comes to employment. The ground can shift without warning. Just look at what happened to tech, where just a few years ago employees could command high salaries and large signing bonuses. Many are now looking for their next step.
 
Lots of replies, thank you everyone!


You say your work is in tech but then use an example of investment banking. Either way, both of those fields move fast when it comes to employment. The ground can shift without warning. Just look at what happened to tech, where just a few years ago employees could command high salaries and large signing bonuses. Many are now looking for their next step.
Tech in Investment banking, so lowest totem of the tech world. Tech still is demanding high salaries, just depends what niche you're in.

Stop stressing over the money and choose what your heart desires. The money will follow.
Basically remote and coast, Already prefer more free time then to chase empty titles ,but its just ironic the number keeps going up.
When do you want to be able to retire?

If it's sooner rather than later, suck it up and take the higher paying job. If you're in no rush to RE, take the job you think you'll enjoy more.
I'm to young to think to retire, personally, so next 15 years. I think I'm on a good projection to hit that with a few million in the bank, then it's just back to doing nothing. The problem is even with the higher paying job all the costs to make it work that remove the reason anyway.
TLDR. But I think it depends on whether you're playing the long game or the short game.

Remote workers are measured by their numbers, but are often out-of-sight-out-of-mind.

In-office have the benefit of visibility, networking, contacts and an ability to demonstrate "intangibles" that often lead to recognition and promotions.

I was responsible for a dozen offices worldwide and the people at HQ definitely had an edge, however the remotes had a higher tolerance for mediocre performance.
100% this. But even this in office position, the main office is east coast, so a bit out of sight anyway.
Respectfully, I think your analysis focuses too much on the near term.

Which opportunity aligns most closely with your longer term career objectives?

That would lead me most.
Near term is the biggest issue with most people, because near term is how you set future self for success - but I agree. Right now I just prefer more free time, I already have one client that I'm billing/consulting and one remote job would fit that agenda nicely and be equal the income so I can focus on side business growth.
+1 If you have never worked in investment banking at the director level, don't underestimate that it is a total time suck from what I have observed... you are on call 24/7/365 and work long hours doing what looked to me as fairly boring and unfulfilling work helping the rich get richer.

While your fairly well into your career, I generally advise to not worry about the money and select jobs that provide the best experience. Later in your career, once you have accumulated that great experience then you cash it in for a nice high level corporate job.

I worked remotely during the last 13 years of my career but think it is important to spend at least some time in the office to have some face time with bosses and colleagues. Since we were geographically dispersed if was before video calling, there were numerous colleagues that I would work with via call and email and develop a good working relationship with and then meet later at a practice meeting and would think "Whoa, that isn't what I had in mind!" (and I suspect vice versa).
The fun part is that this is true of any senior IT management position too. They are time sucks, I just imagine the work is more boring on the IB side. But I am over 15 years in my career now - it's just amusing really that in the end the money isn't that rewarding anymore.
Are you looking for your next job or continuing your career? If this is the end of the road to coast for 5 years you pick one door, if this needs to be a springboard for something better later, you pick another.

Given choices, it's rarely about the numbers, but the work, the role, the company. And the remote job is the one to coast and end things.
Continuing career makes sense but, even at my age I'm tired already and prefer a much better work/life balance. In 5 years, I really am not sure where I want to be but I know not retired yet. That would come in the next 10-15 years. It wouldn't be bad for a few years but I'm already not sold on it and the motivation to commute to the office daily seems too much - the company has brand equity but that's about it outside the total comp which, 30% goes to taxes anyway so it doesn't mean much.


At this point, I've accepted both offers, pushed one start date off far into the future, and one early on to see if it's a fit. I have a potential third coming in that I may just decline - but for the gloom and doom on the Internet saying Tech isn't hiring - it is, in different caches. I would say the standard SWE role is def going through a reshaping of what it used to be.
 
Translation: 'Should I take a 350K job or work remotely from a cheap cabin?' Sir, this is the FIRE forum, not a therapy group for overachievers. You've already won. Just pick the one with less gray hair
 
Translation: 'Should I take a 350K job or work remotely from a cheap cabin?' Sir, this is the FIRE forum, not a therapy group for overachievers. You've already won. Just pick the one with less gray hair
Trust me, there is no winning, especially if I can't keep it.
 
Back
Top Bottom