OldShooter
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I think Occam's Razor can be easily adapted to the endless dividend debate: "Despite appearances, there is never any free money."
Thank you! But can anyone really think 67% distribution is sustainable?Not a typo. they're loading up on levered covered call funds (of which I know nothing) that pay monster monthly dividend (or Return of Capital) and they completely acknowledge a do not care about NAV/share price erosion. Some think they have a formula to get out of certain triggers.
It might be good if the gravy train runs out sooner than later so these “investors” get a wakeup call. Of course many will just move on to the next shiny object.Dividend investing is just another way of selling growth and spending it to meet today’s wants and needs. Instead of the stockholder placing a sale order, the corporation takes profit that could have been reinvested and sends it to the shareholder.
Either way, without growth in the value of the company the gravy train will run out of fuel at some point.
My first thought on reading the Bogleheads article is that these people are chasing the proverbial free(-ish) lunch.I think Occam's Razor can be easily adapted to the endless dividend debate: "Despite appearances, there is never any free money."