Markola
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Difficult topic. My city has growing numbers of panhandlers on corners, in shopping districts, by our grocery market, and elsewhere. I’m curious how others approach it? When I see someone on the usual corners every single time I drive, I have both a reaction of human pity, the usual “There but for the grace of God go I,” and “I wonder where that person will sleep tonight?” Seeing women hits me harder, and seeing kids is obviously more distressing. I have come to ignore them and not make eye contact, because there are simply so many, which I then feel bad about, even though I’m just driving somewhere and need to stop at certain red lights. I let myself, I guess, feel like a bad human in a broken society.
But I also understand economics. My state of Minnesota and my city is famously high tax and high service. On top of that, we have an abundance of faith-based nonprofits whose donors, staff and volunteers provide every manner of support, food, shelter, job training and other services that they can. Yet our homeless population grows. If I give the lady on the corner money, not to mention the able-bodied man, and the cars behind me do the same, are we incentivizing self-help and giving a hand up? Or are we incentivizing getting by another day on the street corner with a cardboard sign? Am I helping a person find their next meal, or am I helping them buy their next bottle or fix on the way to the free meal and lodging over at the church or the shelter? If the person is an immigrant, especially with small kids, it generates a whole different set of conflicting internal questions, such as whether I have a responsibility to them if they broke my country’s laws to come here for our largess? I have so much social capital, much of which I was insanely fortunate to be born with, starting by simply being born in the richest country in the history of the world. Am I a bad person for not giving a few bucks to a fellow human who doesn’t have as much? Or am I contributing to the perpetuation of their difficult circumstances? If we solve the issue in Minnesota will we become a magnet for Chicago’s homeless and troubled? I cannot know. I also cannot know if I’m simply a greedy, uncaring __-hole.
I’ve been to the truly wonderful state of California but have seen the disasters that have happened to the downtowns of their major cities. I’ve lived in DC where I was asked for spare change dozens of times every day. The same thing is happening here in our generous city. I’ve been to other cities and countries where people are not living in tents by freeways and in the city parks. What do they do that works better? Socialism has never worked in world history, yet our own city councils are being filled with no-doubt well-meaning avowed socialists. Unfettered capitalism chews up people and spits them out, throwing them onto the streets. See: The Great Depression. Some cities drive their homeless to the city limits and say “Do not come back,” which is too harsh for my values. We have a middle system that taxes earners to provide a basic social safety net, which philanthropy further supports. And yet, the street corners and city parks fill.
Please leave partisanship and religious piety out of any comments. I’m just looking for a better and more enlightened practical mindset, if there is one.
But I also understand economics. My state of Minnesota and my city is famously high tax and high service. On top of that, we have an abundance of faith-based nonprofits whose donors, staff and volunteers provide every manner of support, food, shelter, job training and other services that they can. Yet our homeless population grows. If I give the lady on the corner money, not to mention the able-bodied man, and the cars behind me do the same, are we incentivizing self-help and giving a hand up? Or are we incentivizing getting by another day on the street corner with a cardboard sign? Am I helping a person find their next meal, or am I helping them buy their next bottle or fix on the way to the free meal and lodging over at the church or the shelter? If the person is an immigrant, especially with small kids, it generates a whole different set of conflicting internal questions, such as whether I have a responsibility to them if they broke my country’s laws to come here for our largess? I have so much social capital, much of which I was insanely fortunate to be born with, starting by simply being born in the richest country in the history of the world. Am I a bad person for not giving a few bucks to a fellow human who doesn’t have as much? Or am I contributing to the perpetuation of their difficult circumstances? If we solve the issue in Minnesota will we become a magnet for Chicago’s homeless and troubled? I cannot know. I also cannot know if I’m simply a greedy, uncaring __-hole.
I’ve been to the truly wonderful state of California but have seen the disasters that have happened to the downtowns of their major cities. I’ve lived in DC where I was asked for spare change dozens of times every day. The same thing is happening here in our generous city. I’ve been to other cities and countries where people are not living in tents by freeways and in the city parks. What do they do that works better? Socialism has never worked in world history, yet our own city councils are being filled with no-doubt well-meaning avowed socialists. Unfettered capitalism chews up people and spits them out, throwing them onto the streets. See: The Great Depression. Some cities drive their homeless to the city limits and say “Do not come back,” which is too harsh for my values. We have a middle system that taxes earners to provide a basic social safety net, which philanthropy further supports. And yet, the street corners and city parks fill.
Please leave partisanship and religious piety out of any comments. I’m just looking for a better and more enlightened practical mindset, if there is one.
Last edited: