Does your doctor respond to requests via secure messaging?

So what then? I call to make an appointment that I'm seen in 4 weeks? Is THAT appropriate for my symptom? Hardly. The point is that the doctor be able to judge how urgent of an issue this is. She knows my history and can tell me to go straight to an ER, not pass go and she'll call for me ahead so they expect me, or she can tell me this is concerning and to schedule an appointment at my earliest convenience.

I'm not a doctor, how would I know if something is serious or not? I'm at 10,000+ feet, exerting myself in sub freezing, near zero air temperature and for all I know, I'm giving my lungs the equivalent of an ice cream headache. I don't feel bad, my chest has a pain. My pulse is fine, I'm able to make conversation, so it's not that I'm exhausted, weak, tired. I ask her, do I need to have this further examined or not.

If my doctor ever told me what you just did, she can't wait to retire, based on a question I asked, I'd be shopping for someone who wants to be a doctor. You want to be retired, can't wait even. Physician heal thyself.

In the meantime, I'm out the door. 6" of fresh snow fell overnight and I want first tracks. Come on ticker, hang in there for one more day on the slopes baby!
Cheers!
Clearly I don't tell my patients I can't wait to retire because of their messages. I think it all the time, however. You're not my patient though, so I don't have to have this restraint.

I'd imagine that most of us on this forum can't/couldn't wait to retire. That doesn't make me a bad physician. Most of us can't wait to quit working one day.
 
15 minutes ago I received an email for a secure message in the portal from my doc, log in there is nothing there.
 
Also, suggesting a charge for messages is not turning a physician practice into a bank. We already collect copays, and there are many charges. You do realize we charge for our services, right?
Yes, I understand that you charge - no need for the snark. But my opinion remains the same. If you charge for something like messaging, it’s the same thing as the bank charging a fee to speak with a representative, IMO.

Have any suggestions?
Yes, I made a suggestion several comments ago: have some kind of message pop up that outlines what is appropriate and what is not when using messaging. It’s a communication issue, or at least communication might help.

We already spend a significant amount of time working beyond our normal business hours. Besides our scheduled patient hours and overbooks, we have paperwork, forms to fill out, results to review and respond to, patient calls, patient messages, CME, and other administrative tasks.
Out of curiosity, can you share how many hours per week are patient care and how many are administrative?
 
Yes, I understand that you charge - no need for the snark. But my opinion remains the same. If you charge for something like messaging, it’s the same thing as the bank charging a fee to speak with a representative, IMO.

We can agree to disagree on this.

Yes, I made a suggestion several comments ago: have some kind of message pop up that outlines what is appropriate and what is not when using messaging. It’s a communication issue, or at least communication might help.

We already have something similar that pops up.

Out of curiosity, can you share how many hours per week are patient care and how many are administrative?

My schedule is a bit different than most PCPs, as I am in administration as well, so I probably spend about 25-30 hours in admin time and 30 hours in direct patient care. When I was full time PCP, it was 45 hours in direct patient care and about 15 hours admin time, sometimes a bit less.

When you look at the data, nationwide, 15-40% of a PCP's time is spent on administrative work.
 
Mine seems to be pretty responsive. I actually found her via Facebook as I was complaining there were no "local" doctors taking on new Medicare patients. A friend mentioned her, and she agreed to take on both DW and myself.
 
When you look at the data, nationwide, 15-40% of a PCP's time is spent on administrative work.
As a relatively recently retired PCP, I can confirm this. And again, all of that administrative work is unpaid time. Responding to emails or portal messages or phone calls, filling out forms, getting prior authorizations, refilling prescriptions, etc. We don't earn a penny for any of that time.

I understand that patients get upset when their provider won't answer a "simple" question without an office visit, but you need to understand that provider's side of that. They are legally responsible for any advice they give you so they want to be sure it's correct. It's nearly impossible to get the full picture with just a message or even a phone call. Patients often leave out vital details. Not intentionally, of course. They just don't always realize what is important to mention. And they have no medical training so they often mistake a symptom for something else. I can't tell you how many patients came to see me for "heartburn" only to be in the cardiac cath lab within the hour getting stents in their arteries. Or how many came in for "poison ivy" when what they actually had was shingles. If I responded to a message asking for cream for poison ivy without an office visit, that would have been problematic.

Messaging is fine, but if your provider says, "come in", there's typically a good reason for that.
 
15 minutes ago I received an email for a secure message in the portal from my doc, log in there is nothing there.
If it’s in MyChart, I could be buried in a number of places. That app is terrible. I’ve had the red circled “1” notification and even in the app the notice shows up, but it’s often difficult to find the message. It depends on what kind of message it is and you have to check multiple places.
 
As a relatively recently retired PCP, I can confirm this. And again, all of that administrative work is unpaid time. Responding to emails or portal messages or phone calls, filling out forms, getting prior authorizations, refilling prescriptions, etc. We don't earn a penny for any of that time.
I have tremendous respect for healthcare providers, but I also think there’s a disconnect if the general consensus among that group if there’s a wide belief that every minute should be paid time. For example, most of the professionals I worked with traveled extensively, and much of that travel was not during business hours, but rather after or before a full day. And I usually worked while flying, often doing the administrative work that you’re speaking of: catching up on email, filing expenses, preparing for meetings, etc. I never once considered that unpaid time. Maybe I’m in the minority, though.
 
Your compensation was maybe a different structure? I think most doctors have a comparatively low base salary ( for which they are expected to see x patients ) and then after that get a percentage of subsequent visits. Or have a series of targets. And a LOT of what we collect goes to overhead. In the “ good old days” it was 40% Pretty sure it is more now. And remember we don’t collect rack rate ever. New MDs also have hundreds of thousands of med school debt.

Compare us to lawyers. They bill for every message and phone call
 
Compare us to lawyers.
Thought about that. Not the cohort I’d want to associate with, so I refrained. It felt worse than the bank comparison. :)

Your compensation was maybe a different structure? I think most doctors have a comparatively low base salary ( for which they are expected to see x patients ) and then after that get a percentage of subsequent visits. Or have a series of targets. And a LOT of what we collect goes to overhead. In the “ good old days” it was 40% Pretty sure it is more now. And remember we don’t collect rack rate ever. New MDs also have hundreds of thousands of med school debt.
I’m not discounting anything you state, other than maybe the low base salary, which is relative. I just believe that the expectation to be paid for every minute is unreasonable and that expectation explains the position taken by the physicians who have weighed in. In that light, yes I can understand that there is resentment towards patient messaging.
 
I was responding to your comment on the compensation aspect but as someone said above and it is probably a bigger issue a lot of messages can not be dealt with appropriately without talking to the patient at a minimum or in most cases seeing them

Of course there have always been messages. I used to get little slips of paper attached to a paper charts- piles of them. But to convey that message they had to speak to a human who could sometimes direct it to my nurse ,or sometimes to me urgently. I think it is easier to send my chart messages and the volume exploded
 
Compare us to lawyers. They bill for every message and phone call
I’m not going to defend lawyers but if you don’t think they eat a lot of time, you’re very mistaken. Sure, they bill for messages and phone calls but that’s because that’s an area where they can easily identify their time directly to a client. My experience is in a CPA firm. I got paid a salary had to bill 90% of my time, so 36 hours during a normal week. In order to produce 36 billable hours, it took about a 50 hour week. You can’t bill for many things in the day (administrative, research, meetings, getting new clients, etc). I expect law firms are the same.
 
Thought about that. Not the cohort I’d want to associate with, so I refrained. It felt worse than the bank comparison. :)


I’m not discounting anything you state, other than maybe the low base salary, which is relative. I just believe that the expectation to be paid for every minute is unreasonable and that expectation explains the position taken by the physicians who have weighed in. In that light, yes I can understand that there is resentment towards patient messaging.
You need to follow the progression that has occurred over time to get a real feel for the issue. When I went into practice in 1993, there was no email. There were no electronic medical records. There was no online messaging. And we didn't have insurance companies and corporate overlords watching our every move and number-crunching and penny-pinching every decision. Sure we had unpaid work back then if we took a phone call to answer a question, for example. But it was a minimal part of our day and we were reasonably well compensated for the actual patient care work we did.

Over the years, as managed care grew and private practices faded away and got replaced by corporate medicine, the entire landscape changed. We found ourselves doing more and more and more busy work that had nothing at all to do with caring for our patients. We were given ever more ridiculous metrics to meet, and if we missed them by even a fraction of a percent, we weren't paid. Then the government made things magnitudes worse by pretty much requiring us to switch from paper charts to electronic records. That cost practices tens of thousands of dollars to implement and caused productivity and employee satisfaction to plummet. The focus became clicking the right boxes rather than providing the best care for the patients. Along the way, reimbursement also significantly fell and failed to keep up with the ever growing overhead costs of running a practice. As for running the practices, rather than the doctors doing that, it was now being done by MBAs and other business people who know absolutely nothing about practicing medicine. All they care about is the bottom line. How can we make more money? How can we get our Google reviews higher? Not "how can we make our patients healthier?"

Today about 80% of PCPs are employees. The private practice model where the doctor is his/her own boss is largely a thing of the past. This also greatly contributes to lower pay and lower job satisfaction. So when you put all of that together and add in an ever-growing burden of handling emails and messages for zero compensation, it just further erodes the system.

I could go into far more detail, so understand that I'm just trying to give a very broad overview here. Just trust that this is a real problem and it's a problem that has only continued to worsen over the past 10+ years.
 
I think it is easier to send my chart messages and the volume exploded
Yep - completely understand. You may also want to consider the perspective of the customer, in this case the patient. While improper online requests need to be addressed, the ability to communicate with my doctor has exponentially improved my healthcare experience. Prior to online messaging, there really wasn’t a way to communicate. As mentioned before, the only thing I’ve used messaging for has been to ask if a referral can be issued or do I need to come in first. More often than not, the referral is issued without a visit. That’s a huge benefit for me.
 
Prior to online messaging, there really wasn’t a way to communicate.
You had a telephone. And odds are that it got answered by a human in the office who you actually knew.

Today, of course, getting a human on the phone can be a real challenge. And when you do manage to get a person, chances are high that they aren't actually in the office you think you're calling but rather a central call center.

I had a question recently and after a couple of failed attempts to get a person on the phone, I just drove over to the office and took care of it in person. I could have texted my doctor but it was an insurance question, not a medical one, so I didn't think it was worthy of bothering her with.
 
Thought about that. Not the cohort I’d want to associate with, so I refrained. It felt worse than the bank comparison. :)


I’m not discounting anything you state, other than maybe the low base salary, which is relative. I just believe that the expectation to be paid for every minute is unreasonable and that expectation explains the position taken by the physicians who have weighed in. In that light, yes I can understand that there is resentment towards patient messaging.
Nobody here, except for you, has said that physicians expect to be paid for every minute.
 
Starting 1/1/2026, my PCP (small office with 3 doctors) started charging $75 or $95 per month for enhanced portal access, depending on level of service: Basic or Top-Tier. It's voluntary and patients who don't pay can still use the portal but the message is routed to and handled by a "virtual care team" located in the Philippines. I have infrequent contact with my PCP so I don't plan to pay for a membership. Will see how it goes.
 
I’m not going to defend lawyers but if you don’t think they eat a lot of time, you’re very mistaken. Sure, they bill for messages and phone calls but that’s because that’s an area where they can easily identify their time directly to a client. My experience is in a CPA firm. I got paid a salary had to bill 90% of my time, so 36 hours during a normal week. In order to produce 36 billable hours, it took about a 50 hour week. You can’t bill for many things in the day (administrative, research, meetings, getting new clients, etc). I expect law firms are the same.
Lawyers definitely bill for research. Furthermore, I suspect $450-600 an hour covers quite a bit of overhead and slop.
 
But my opinion remains the same. If you charge for something like messaging, it’s the same thing as the bank charging a fee to speak with a representative, IMO.
Ridiculous thing to say. Equating an MD with a bank representative is way off base.
 
Prudent use of the messaging system is the best approach. You have to be realistic as to what a physician can and should be able to accomplish with a message.
This I agree with.

If the goal is good patient care, then I would think doctors would be all for patients contacting them (occasionally) with questions. I used to "save up" my questions and my (then) PCP jumped all over me for taking too much of his time. SO which is it?

I can see your frustration with piddly stuff from patients, but patient contact through the portal seems to me the best thing that's happened in patient care in quite some time. The old "call me if something changes" was a pain and rarely did I get a call back - especially in a timely fashion.


If you don't have a "gate keeper" checking your messages, then I suggest you get one. Most of the time my doctor's gate keeper is all I need and she (the doctor's nurse) answers (or finds out between patient visits) what I need to know. Why would I take up a 15 minute patient slot to ask a fairly simple question that the nurse (or, just maybe) the doctor can answer in a few minutes. IIRC my doc gets paid whether I come in or not (salary). Only thing I might do is make his day longer - by coming in. Gate keeper handles all but the ones where the doc might say "I need to see you about this."

I really do see your side of this. I hope you see the patient's side.
 
Clearly I don't tell my patients I can't wait to retire because of their messages. I think it all the time, however. You're not my patient though, so I don't have to have this restraint.

I'd imagine that most of us on this forum can't/couldn't wait to retire. That doesn't make me a bad physician. Most of us can't wait to quit working one day.
I LOVED my w*rk. I stayed 7 years beyond my Financial Independence because I loved my w*rk! I hated the Corp. BS and micromanagement and the attitude that empl*yees should hate their w*rk or else management isn't doing its j*b! It sounds like you hate your w*rk. I would encourage you to get out ASAP.
 
This I agree with.

If the goal is good patient care, then I would think doctors would be all for patients contacting them (occasionally) with questions. I used to "save up" my questions and my (then) PCP jumped all over me for taking too much of his time. SO which is it?

I can see your frustration with piddly stuff from patients, but patient contact through the portal seems to me the best thing that's happened in patient care in quite some time. The old "call me if something changes" was a pain and rarely did I get a call back - especially in a timely fashion.


If you don't have a "gate keeper" checking your messages, then I suggest you get one. Most of the time my doctor's gate keeper is all I need and she (the doctor's nurse) answers (or finds out between patient visits) what I need to know. Why would I take up a 15 minute patient slot to ask a fairly simple question that the nurse (or, just maybe) the doctor can answer in a few minutes. IIRC my doc gets paid whether I come in or not (salary). Only thing I might do is make his day longer - by coming in. Gate keeper handles all but the ones where the doc might say "I need to see you about this."

I really do see your side of this. I hope you see the patient's side.
If I have a question for my accountant or attorney, two other highly educated busy professionals, I don't expect to have a direct messaging service that I can pick their brain for free. Nor do most people. I don't understand why my profession is any different.

This being said, I don't dissuade most patients from sending me messages, and in many cases, I request them to message me. For example, lets say I start a new antidepressant for a low risk patient. I may ask them to call or message me in 4-6 weeks to let me know how they are doing, if there are any side effects, and if they would like a dose increase. I do this in lieu of an office visit, for patient convenience. It would be much easier for me to bring them back in 4-6 weeks for a quick and easy office visit. On the other hand, I have had discussions with some patients about proper messaging and what I am able to reasonable accomplish with a MyChart message.

The goal is good patient care, and some of the worst patient care possible is trying to do too much with a MyChart message. Often the best patient care is to ask the patient to come in to be seen.

Your doc would love an easy visit with a simple question. My patients aren't making my day longer with an easy visit. All of my slots fill up everyday regardless, and I voluntarily double book most days.

I wish I had the ability to have a "gate keeper" to manage my messages. I truly do. I don't even have a dedicated nurse. 1:1 (nurse to doctor) staffing is becoming less and less common in primary care. I'm an employed physician, so I can't control this.

I do see the patient's point of view. I'm also a patient myself, albeit I can answer most of my own medical questions, to be fair.
 
I LOVED my w*rk. I stayed 7 years beyond my Financial Independence because I loved my w*rk! I hated the Corp. BS and micromanagement and the attitude that empl*yees should hate their w*rk or else management isn't doing its j*b! It sounds like you hate your w*rk. I would encourage you to get out ASAP.

I don't hate my job, though I do hate certain aspects of it. I also enjoy many aspects of it, and seeing my hard work improve others' lives is incredibly rewarding. However, I also can't wait to retire. I have invested far too much time and money to start over doing something I truly love, and expect to ever recoup financially.
 
If I have a question for my accountant or attorney, two other highly educated busy professionals, I don't expect to have a direct messaging service that I can pick their brain for free. Nor do most people. I don't understand why my profession is any different.
Actually, they both do have direct messaging, it’s called email and texts. The difference is the payment mechanism. Doctors get paid by a third party that controls the rate and conditions for billing. Accountants and lawyers actually sell time and have a mechanism to get paid for communication even if it’s just by charging a boat load for the hours that they do bill and calling the rest admin or overhead. Doctors typically don’t do that. That’s part of why the concierge model started showing up.
 
Back
Top Bottom