Stormy Kromer
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2017
- Messages
- 1,643
My son and daughter in law are hurt. I should have mentioned this at the beginning.
Don’t?You mention your wedding and your now ex wife ? Any other marriage advice on weddings?
And that’s understandable, since the “No kids” rule isn’t applied equally.My son and daughter in law are hurt. I should have mentioned this at the beginning.
My son and his wife are deeply hurt that their children are not invited while 10 other nieces and nephews on the grooms side are invited. I am sorry for sounding selfish for wanting my two grand daughters to be at a once in a life time family event while 250 others are there. The grooms parents have many of their 25 grand children there.It is odd that the rules are “No kids”, but then those rules aren’t applied to everyone equally.
But with ages of 2 and newborn, your grandkids will have no recollection of the event. YOU will be missing out on having them there, but they won’t miss a thing.
I apologize. I was out of line. Please no hard feelings. The internet is too easy for loose talk when frustrated. I like my friends here and apologize for things I would not say in person.I'm sorry I upset you. I won't post anymore in this thread.
I'm missing something here. I can understand your DD not wanting little kids at the wedding and reception. BTW, I don't agree and we wouldn't do that in our family, but I can understand it. And while it seems that your DD is being hypocritical by allowing kids of the wedding party to attend and not her own nieces, it is hard to critique without more information like the ages of those kids.OP here. All I wanted was to have a chance to see my wife, our two children and their spouses and two grandchildren together at the same place and time. I thought our daughter's wedding would be a good opportunity. We can't even get a family photo because the grand children aren't invited. ...
I understand. But I had posted earlier if this is a discussion your daughter had directly with your son, or if it being passed through you. It is not clear if there is any closeness between your son and daughter. From what is posted - and I can be wrong - there seems to be some friction between your daughter and son that would cause her to not make an exception for your grandkids.My son and daughter in law are hurt. I should have mentioned this at the beginning.
You're letting a 2 year old and newborn down by not fighting to have them in attendance? Here's the part where I dip out.At the end of the day everyone. Your family will be there for you. I feel like I am letting my grandchildren down missing out on a family event where they'll never see everyone together at the same place and time again.
So is this mostly about a chance to have everybody together in one place? Take some photos for posterity?OP here. All I wanted was to have a chance to see my wife, our two children and their spouses and two grandchildren together at the same place and time. I thought our daughter's wedding would be a good opportunity.
It's understandable they would be hurt with the rules being applied somewhat differently for the two sides of the bride and groom. Your feelings are also understandable since you are paying for the wedding and it is your grandchildren (young or not) that are not included. I understand no babies at the ceremony because I made this rule at my daughter's wedding (that I paid for). My future son-in-law called me wanting his 2 month old nephew at the wedding. I told him I didn't want a crying baby to disrupt the vows for them or the guests. So we came up with a plan, that as soon as baby cried, the brides mother holding the baby would exit the ceremony immediately, and that is exactly what happened. All children were allowed at the reception. I hope you are able to get a resolution that works for you, your family and son.My son and daughter in law are hurt. I should have mentioned this at the beginning.