For Seniors (65+) taking the Standard Deduction - $50K is the new Black

junkanoo

Full time employment: Posting here.
Joined
Mar 31, 2025
Messages
523
Location
New England
Or 49,500 to be specific. Because the new math for a couple filing MFJ when both are 65+ is:

Standard Deduction (2026) : $32,200
Extra Senior Deduction: 3,300
Senior Deduction 12,000
Charitable Cash Contribution: 2,000
Total 49,500

or $41,850 if only one of them is 65+

I know someone is going to squawk about the new $2K cash contribution deduction in 2026, but I think it's reasonable that many standard deduction filers give that amount to their church or key charities (last year) without getting a dime in deductions. Now, you're getting that $2K deduction. Either way, it doesn't affect the main conclusions.

So, I just watched a video where the creator had a scenario of a couple (let's call them Couple A, both 65) *not* taking SS yet (post 65) and then (besides a small amount of interest received $1,925) they would be funding their income needs from their T-IRA account (140K T-IRA withdrawal). Which highlighted that $47,575 of that 140K amount was tax-free. Thus, that 401K contribution back-in-the-day that you never paid a dime on taxes on (turned into a T-IRA) ... now $47,575 of that arrives to you tax-free because of the new math.

Pretty slick, except I'm not sure how many people make it past 65 without at least one of the spouses taking SS. After all, not all couples are both high SS earners. So, for one of the spouses to take SS early while the other higher earner waits until 70 is quite reasonable in many cases.

So, let's consider another couple (Couple B), both also 65, where one spouse is getting 20K in SS and the other is waiting. To make it reasonably apples to apples, let's make the "Gross" Income the same ($141,925), thus both couples need/want the same income to live on while Couple A defers taking two SS incomes and Couple B is deferring taking only one (larger) SS payout. Let's also assume that the second couple is not as interested in maxing out how much their T-IRA withdrawal will be tax-free and more interested in a more optimal tax situation. This they model by staying under the taxable income limit (so that LTCGs are not taxed at all) while being wary about taking much from their taxable account - that is significantly lower than their T-IRA account.

This is their first attempt; interest income stays the same, LTCG is 20K and the balance of their income comes from their T-IRA account.

Type of Income - Couple BAmount ReceivedTaxed AtFederal Income Tax
Excluded Social Security (untaxed 15% of total)$ 3,000
0%​
$ -
Taxable SS Against Standard Deduction + Senior Deduction + $2K Charitable Cash Contribution$ 17,000
0%​
$ -
Taxable Interest Against Standard Deduction + Senior Deduction + $2K Charitable Cash Contribution$ 1,925
0%​
$ -
Taxable T-IRA Distribution against Standard Deduction + Senior Deduction + $2K Charitable Cash Contribution$ 30,575
0%​
$ -
Taxable T-IRA Distribution against 10% Bracket$ 24,800
10%​
$ 2,480
Taxable T-IRA Distribution against 12% Bracket$ 44,625
12%​
$ 5,355
Non-Taxable LTCGs$ 20,000
0%​
$ -
"Gross" Income & Total Fed Taxes$ 141,925$ 7,835
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)$ 138,925
Effective Tax Rate based on AGI
5.6%​
Taxable Income$ 89,425
Effective Tax Rate based on Taxable Income
8.8%​

In this first effort, slightly over $30K of T-IRA withdrawals are NOT taxed, which is much lower than the other couple's result of nearly $50K in non-taxed T-IRA distributions ... BUT, still, directionally reach their goal as they are paying $7,835 in Federal Taxes compared to the other couple that are paying $10,595 on the same "Gross" income. This is achieved because (1) 3K of SS was not taxed and they stayed below the limit so that $20 in LTCGs was not taxed.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Eyes just glossed over it. These numbers are not applicable to us. If you must know, we are trying to avoid the second tier of IRMAA. No BBB addtional deductions.
 
... Pretty slick, except I'm not sure how many people make it past 65 without at least one of the spouses taking SS. After all, not all couples are both high SS earners. So, for one of the spouses to take SS early while the other higher earner waits until 70 is quite reasonable in many cases. ...
TLDR, but we were both retired at 56 and DW didn't take SS until her FRA and I waited to 70. We loved off of taxable savings. Probably others here as well so it may not be as rare as you think.
 
The subject says, "For Seniors (65+) taking the Standard Deduction - $50K is the new Black"

But all of the scenarios only involve couples. There are many seniors here that are not couples.

Exactly. Nearly all tax advice or retirement planning advice is for married couples. Then the narrative is about the "widow cliff". What about folks who aren't married?

Also note the example of $1,925 taxable interest. Uh, come again? If that happens to be a person's financial position, OK then.... maybe we'd not be worrying much about taxes anyway. But one supposes that for a person whose situation is consistent with FIRE, that number - if we include taxable interest and dividends is, ahem, like maybe two orders of magnitude larger? At least? And that's before RMDs, before any inherited IRAs, before any proceeds of trading and so on
 
The subject says, "For Seniors (65+) taking the Standard Deduction - $50K is the new Black"

But all of the scenarios only involve couples. There are many seniors here that are not couples.

The OP chose to show the MFJ scenarios. Feel free to show the Single 65+ scenarios. Why does everything have to be a debate on Married or not?

Flieger
 
The OP chose to show the MFJ scenarios. Feel free to show the Single 65+ scenarios. Why does everything have to be a debate on Married or not?
I'm sorry you considered that to be a debate about getting married. It certainly wasn't. Also remember that many people who get married end up single at some point. The subject didn't mention anything about couples, so it was just click bait for many people. Seems like a big oversight.
 
I am impressed by how many unique members there are.

We all have a set of unique retirement numbers.

MFJ, post-RMD. Dual SS checks, one pension. The 22% vortex has us captured now.
 
This something I will be looking at closer as the year goes on (not now, I'd rather spend my time thinking about our upcoming cruise :) ). With the tax changes in 2025, even with my good pension and DW's small SS, we were able to (including Roth conversion) and sneak into the 12% bracket for the first time. The added charitable deduction will help this year, since we give a lot more than the limit.I just have to decide if I want to stay in the 12% or move back into the 22% with larger Roth conversions (first world problem for sure 😂)
 
I'm sorry you considered that to be a debate about getting married. It certainly wasn't. Also remember that many people who get married end up single at some point. The subject didn't mention anything about couples, so it was just click bait for many people. Seems like a big oversight.
I just know what's coming from your prior "MFJ v. Single" posts. There are many different situations for this. The OP chose to show/discuss one such situation. It applies to 60% to 70% of the over 50 population, but there are certainly others that, as you say, for one reason or another are no longe in the MFJ column. They'll figure out how it applies to them.

Flieger
 
I tried one of the tax calculators last week with a $2000 charitable contribution and $150,000 income, MFJ. The calculator reduced the contribution by the 0.5% of AGI. Does anyone know if the calculator was correct to do this when the standard deduction was used?
 
I just know what's coming from your prior "MFJ v. Single" posts. There are many different situations for this. The OP chose to show/discuss one such situation. It applies to 60% to 70% of the over 50 population, but there are certainly others that, as you say, for one reason or another are no longe in the MFJ column. They'll figure out how it applies to them.

Flieger
True enough, but the point is that articles asserting that "Don't worry, your tax situation won't be as bad as you fear" tend to assume MFJ.... and for all the myriad pros and cons of married life, taxes generally fall under the pros. Well then, a single taxpayer might be falsely lulled into regarding his or her tax situation as being not all that irksome, if guided (misguided) by the MFJ-focused literature. Then maybe our hero or heroine is in for a rude awakening.
 
Thoughts?
My thoughts are that this is an insanely low effective tax rate for an income of close to $140k. Think about the effective tax rate on a younger person who is single and surviving on an income of only 40K or 50K
 
I tried one of the tax calculators last week with a $2000 charitable contribution and $150,000 income, MFJ. The calculator reduced the contribution by the 0.5% of AGI. Does anyone know if the calculator was correct to do this when the standard deduction was used?
See Section 170(p) Special rule for taxpayers who do not elect to itemize deductions, and note that it says there to ignore Section 170(b)(I)(1). That's the section that describes the 0.5% floor.

So, based on that, the tax calculator you tried is wrong. Was it one of the ones covered in Tax estimation tools - Bogleheads? I tried the Case Study Spreadsheet and it appears correct (based on how I read the law above).
 
My thoughts are that this is an insanely low effective tax rate for an income of close to $140k. Think about the effective tax rate on a younger person who is single and surviving on an income of only 40K or 50K
Yeah. I just ran Dinkytown and the single having W2 income of $50k pays 7.65% effective! About 14% less than the 8.8% being paid in the example. Injustice!
 
My thoughts are that this is an insanely low effective tax rate for an income of close to $140k. Think about the effective tax rate on a younger person who is single and surviving on an income of only 40K or 50K

Yeah. I just ran Dinkytown and the single having W2 income of $50k pays 7.65% effective! About 14% less than the 8.8% being paid in the example. Injustice!
Including FICA for the single filer doubles that rate. Depends on the criteria....
 
The subject says, "For Seniors (65+) taking the Standard Deduction - $50K is the new Black"

But all of the scenarios only involve couples. There are many seniors here that are not couples.

So the thread isn’t directed at you. Do you expect every thread to apply to everyone? No need to participate or comment on every thread, only those of interest to you...
 
Last edited:
True enough, but the point is that articles asserting that "Don't worry, your tax situation won't be as bad as you fear" tend to assume MFJ.... and for all the myriad pros and cons of married life, taxes generally fall under the pros. Well then, a single taxpayer might be falsely lulled into regarding his or her tax situation as being not all that irksome, if guided (misguided) by the MFJ-focused literature. Then maybe our hero or heroine is in for a rude awakening.
Yes, I prefer to look at financial metrics on a per person basis, whether income, net worth, or income taxes.
Many tax bracket kind of things are double for MFJ compared to Single, so that works just fine...
 
Yes, I prefer to look at financial metrics on a per person basis, whether income, net worth, or income taxes.
Many tax bracket kind of things are double for MFJ compared to Single, so that works just fine...
Except maybe the taxation of Social Security..... pretty important for retired singles or couples.
 
The affect is real for some of us. Below are the numbers for DW and myself that I pulled from my spreadsheet.

Row 1 is 2022 where I screwed up and got into IRMAA, so I took our income even higher that year.
Row 2 and 3 were 2023 and 2024. (crowding IRMAA these 2 years-yes I left some money on the table)
Row 4 was last year (DW was over 65 year of age, but I wasn't).
Row 5-8 (2026-2028, now both 65). (Full disclosure-I haven't corrected for the $150,000 phase-out yet).

*(Obviously, I have made some assumptions on the 10%, 12%, and 22% cutoffs going forward.)

Projected (or Actual) MAGI
(Compare to Target Windows for Tax Rates and IRMAA)
(Line 11)
Estimate of Fed Taxes Due
Estimate of State Taxes Due
$243,639.00
$40,100.00
$7,510.00
$205,258.00
$29,049.14
$5,777.55
$212,044.69
$29,713.49
$6,007.97
$135,387.90
$5,323.20
$2,267.67
$149,252.12
$4,966.57
$1,825.43
$152,700.00
$5,686.32
$1,745.13
$156,001.00
$5,679.12
$1,805.01
 
Back
Top Bottom