Freedom56
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
For 20 years, I have always used bond ratings as a start for investigating good companies. One thing is that ratings agencies always lag and are compromised by some of the companies they rate. It is like big brokers who maintain buy ratings on stocks. Nortel never had a sell rating.
In the case of GE, they have been losing money for years and taking writing down their investments which have been disasters. They have reported negative cash flow for years. They are under SEC and Justice department investigation for accounting fraud. Yet the rating agencies still rate their bonds BBB+ which indicates that the rating agencies have no credibility whatsoever. This is no different than those same agencies rating subprime mortgage debt at AAA. The problem with GE is they have so much debt that they will never pay back. Think of the losses that all those passive bond funds will suffer when they default on that debt.
It is always a good idea to read research reports from dissenting voices (those few analysts that issue sell ratings) prior to investing in a particular company just for their point of view. The vast majority will have a buy ratings. In the case of GE there was one, Stephen Tusa of JP Morgan, who issued a sell back in 2016 when GE traded above $32 and reiterated his sell a few weeks ago. In the case of of Harry Markopolis, I would heed his warning.