timbervest
Recycles dryer sheets
I would split equally. Less brain damage and no one can complain.
Not just that- one may have a Masters' in Social work and be doing very challenging work for little pay, or have gotten out of an ugly divorce with not much money left.Hum, as an example, what if one were handicapped and couldn't work and the others were all very successful?
The biggest factor I'd consider in deciding how to split a gift or inheritance is consideration of care provided by the kids. If one or more children pitch in to help parents as they age, that should be compensated very generously.If there is anything left when my wife and I are gone, it will be equally divided between our children. Personally, I don't see how any parent would do otherwise.
Mike
If you withhold money from someone because they are successful, then yes you're punishing them for being successful. Whether they need the money or not is irrelevant.^^^ Hardly punishing IMO to skew gifts to 5-figure son... 7-figure son isn't going to know and even if he did is unlikely to care.
I like the giving depending on the situation at the time. Honestly we have never been a family where we spend the exact same at Christmas etc, etc and it has never been an issue. Younger son knows older son's college was much, much more. Never been an issue. I am leaning toward not feeling we need to disclose every gift. BTW older son has two children. We spent a great deal on his wedding. Younger son is not married. This discussion is really helping me see this more clearly!We have six kiddos, and our "gifts" have not always been equal as it depended upon the situation at the time. For example, one son lived at home rent free for an extended period of time, for another we paid more for education, for another we contributed significant funds towards grandchildren, gifts towards weddings, etc. BTW, we did not feel it was our duty to disclose every gift made to one to all others.
That said, monetary gifts from parents go beyond money - they can be seen as expressions of love. So, I would recommend that OP is very sensitive to the older son's feelings. I would not make any promises about making up any discrepancy in giving later. Too often such promises are not, or cannot be kept due to unexpected circumstances.
I like the giving depending on the situation at the time. Honestly we have never been a family where we spend the exact same at Christmas etc, etc and it has never been an issue. Younger son knows older son's college was much, much more. Never been an issue. I am leaning toward not feeling we need to disclose every gift. BTW older son has two children. We spent a great deal on his wedding. Younger son is not married. This discussion is really helping me see this more clearly!
Exactly!!!!If you withhold money from someone because they are successful, then yes you're punishing them for being successful. Whether they need the money or not is irrelevant.
I don't necessarily agree. If one son has a need today, then he's assisted today. Only time will tell when the other son needs us, so for that reason, I don't split thing evenly at every gifting event. Over a lifetime, things like this tend to balance out.If you withhold money from someone because they are successful, then yes you're punishing them for being successful. Whether they need the money or not is irrelevant.
Why did you ask then? I would be fine in helping the DS, unless the difference was due to an addiction or something that would result in further harm.We are in a very similar situation with DD earning about 10 times more than DS and in absolutely no need for financial assistance. We wanted to gift money to DS for him to buy a house and we had a conversation with each of them. Although DD was totally fine with us giving her brother the money he needed for his house we told them that we wanted to give equally and that is what we are doing.
we would like to give our younger son some of the money so he can possibly buy a house in the next few years.
Our older son does not need our money.
Nope. It is just the way it is. They will inherit equally.This sounds kind of squishy to me.
On the other hand, this sounds definitive:
It flat out sounds to me that you want to give the younger son some of "the money"--possibly for a house, don't know--and you definitely do not want to give the older son any of "our money."
Maybe think about how you've framed the situation. Is there favoritism at work here?
Fair isn't always the same as equal and equal isn't going to always be fair.Really appreciating the input. Giving me a lot to ponder.
I mentioned divide by 2 for the gift.Nope. It is just the way it is. They will inherit equally.
If only it were as simple as dumping the jet!I get your point and while I agree it happens, I'm not sure I'd feel too sorry for anyone making 7 figures and still trying to keep their financial head above water. Maybe try to get by on a smaller jet.Just saying.
We have no children but have 7 nieces and nephews from two of DW's siblings and all the kids are now grown.I mentioned divide by 2 for the gift.
I might write a check to my oldest, who doesn't need the gift, and let him decide. In our family I know my oldest would give it back, knowing what his sibling's needs were.