JoeWras
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2012
- Messages
- 13,365
YARCD (Yet Another Roth Conversion Discussion). Looking at planning for next year.
I have a skeleton in my taxable portfolio, namely, VBIAX. This is an index balanced bond/stock fund. In my younger days, I thought that it would be a good idea to own this in my taxable. A visit with a Vanguard CFP (remember when you had that Flagship benefit?) convinced me to stop this. I've also met with Fido advisors and they are also of the opinion to get rid of this out of taxable. And I don't have to mention that ya'll would agree. It is a good fund, but doesn't belong in taxable.
I've been donating some of it away, but it isn't my highest gain holding. I also can also donate only so much. And I really should be donating from my highest gain ETF lots instead, which far outpace this fund in gains. VBIAX throws off a lot of distributions on a yearly basis so the unrealized gains over time go pretty slow.
So I'm thinking of selling a bunch of it next year instead of doing a Roth conversion. Of course, per other YARCD discussions, I'm watching IRMAA, brackets, etc. With no kids, we don't care much about step up basis on death.
Yet, I feel uneasy about this. I've been comfortable with the Roth conversions with the hope of lower RMDs, and the convenience of having a pool of Roth money to make a large purchase without tax consequences.
On the other side, VBIAX had a large Cap Gain distribution this year. This stuff is unpredictable and a little maddening. I'd like it out of my taxable life (or at least minimized), leaving me only with ETFs and one well behaved mutual fund left in taxable. VBIAX has a lot of old money with a lot of unrealized gain in the NAV. I suspect estate liquidations and internal rebalancing are creating increasing distributions over time.
Is it worth getting rid of a skeleton over Roth conversions? My gut feel is to just go 50/50 and do both up to just short of IRMAA.
I have a skeleton in my taxable portfolio, namely, VBIAX. This is an index balanced bond/stock fund. In my younger days, I thought that it would be a good idea to own this in my taxable. A visit with a Vanguard CFP (remember when you had that Flagship benefit?) convinced me to stop this. I've also met with Fido advisors and they are also of the opinion to get rid of this out of taxable. And I don't have to mention that ya'll would agree. It is a good fund, but doesn't belong in taxable.
I've been donating some of it away, but it isn't my highest gain holding. I also can also donate only so much. And I really should be donating from my highest gain ETF lots instead, which far outpace this fund in gains. VBIAX throws off a lot of distributions on a yearly basis so the unrealized gains over time go pretty slow.
So I'm thinking of selling a bunch of it next year instead of doing a Roth conversion. Of course, per other YARCD discussions, I'm watching IRMAA, brackets, etc. With no kids, we don't care much about step up basis on death.
Yet, I feel uneasy about this. I've been comfortable with the Roth conversions with the hope of lower RMDs, and the convenience of having a pool of Roth money to make a large purchase without tax consequences.
On the other side, VBIAX had a large Cap Gain distribution this year. This stuff is unpredictable and a little maddening. I'd like it out of my taxable life (or at least minimized), leaving me only with ETFs and one well behaved mutual fund left in taxable. VBIAX has a lot of old money with a lot of unrealized gain in the NAV. I suspect estate liquidations and internal rebalancing are creating increasing distributions over time.
Is it worth getting rid of a skeleton over Roth conversions? My gut feel is to just go 50/50 and do both up to just short of IRMAA.