This "strategy" has a big hole which I can't explain. Please explain if you know the answer. I will use an example to better explain the hole. Let's say you are *really* rich and belong to 20% capital gains tax bracket. Let's say you secure a line of credit at 5% interest rate. The break even period is 4 years in this case: 5%*4 years = 20% total interest vs 20% cap gains tax. So if you borrow till you die (which would be significantly longer than 4 years) then you are paying a lot more money in interest vs what you would have paid in capital gains tax. What I don't understand is why popular media loves to talk so much about buy-borrow-die "strategy"?
The only viable explanations I got why rich can't/won't sell equity: Equity is not liquid, they need voting power associated with the equity, etc.