During my last few years at megacorp it became increasingly difficult to promote high performers to management positions.
Especially sales management and business management. There was an ever increasing feeling in the firm that management, especially first level management, was not a desirable position and that the compensation did not match the headaches/responsibilities/staff issues.
Many were of the opinion that senior individual contributor positions were the sweet spot in terms of compensation/responsibility and home life balance.
I lived through Megacorp "de-layering" of management. Hundreds of middle management were shuffled off to staff positions or essentially management in name only (no reports, no power, etc.) I thought "Now that's great. 2 or 3 levels of management have been removed between me and the CEO." At that point, virtually NO one was being promoted to middle management - even the very good people.
But once that de-layering was completed over 2 or 3 years. Megacorp once again re-layered. I suppose the upper management was really just doing "house-keeping" with the middle management.
I knew a guy that got de-layered. He had been my department head before he was promoted to middle management. I dropped into his office for a brief "hello" when I was at the corporate center. There he was in his nice office. He shared a secretary with several other de-layered folks. He had virtually nothing to do. His goal was to get back into a science lab - any lab. He didn't care what they called him (title wise) but he couldn't stand being shuffled off to oblivion. I told him he should be happy he was still getting his pretty nice salary but he just wanted something to do other than shuffle papers. Sad, really. He retired the day he was eligible for his benefits. He came back to our plant site for his retirement party. That's where his friends were.
Good to hear! My plan is to taper my consulting down to zero over the next 5 years, and it's reassuring to know that others have been able to reduce their consulting over time.Over 10 years so far as a part-time consultant. I enjoy the work, appreciate adding value, and get paid appropriately.
FYI, my booking time has decreased from 80% to <20% over time and I do it largely for the mental stimulation. (66YO M)
It's worked out quite well. An interesting observation that as I blocked my schedule for family things, my limited availability increased my desirability.Good to hear! My plan is to taper my consulting down to zero over the next 5 years, and it's reassuring to know that others have been able to reduce their consulting over time.
Yeah, I've been through lean times and fat times at Megacorp. The "flavor of the day" management styles all came and went. BUT I learned very early on: Don't bet against Megacorp stock. It would crash and burn and then recover 3 years later. So when I left, I kept a bunch of it. Today, it's worth (easily) 10 times (more like 15X on a good day) what it was worth when I ER'd. Very nice addition to my stash.Delayered? I hadn't heard that name put to it, but we got a new CEO who, I assume, read a book or hired a consultant and decided that the company had to implement something he called 6 x 8. Meaning the corporation could have no more than 6 layers from the CEO to the bottom most rung and all managers should have 8 direct reports. It didn't take long for us engineers to quickly calculate what the size of the entire corporation should be and notice that it was a lot smaller than its current size. Yeah, you know what happened next. Then again. Then again.. Fortunately, I retired just as that was all beginning. I suppose CEO's will never stop reading so-called "airplane books" and consultants will never stop pushing the latest, greatest ideas to execs.
Cheers.
Same! My original plan was to transition from full-time employment to full-time consulting while maintaining steady income. However, the ability to cherry-pick which projects I accept as a consultant has enabled me to replace my previous full-time position in under 15h/wk.It's worked out quite well. An interesting observation that as I blocked my schedule for family things, my limited availability increased my desirability.
If you're willing, please describe the "decompression" process. When I walked out the door for the last time, I suddenly felt decompressed and didn't have a process that I'm aware of. I never missed "going" into w*rk. The couple of close friendships I had continued (on the outside.) I never missed the actual w*rk I had been doing. It's true that I think of Megacorp often, but the farther away it recedes, the better I remember it. I have few "bad" memories and lots of "good" though I know the human mind usually w*rks that way. Maybe THAT's what decompression means??My plan was to do gig work for a couple years, but after I quit my industry contracted and I haven't worked another day. I have mixed feelings about that but looking back it took me well over a year to decompress so maybe it was for the better.
Thank you so much for sharing. Your story made me think about a former division director I supported in an earlier career. The opposite of a micro-manager. She trusted my abilities to manage things even when I didn't trust myself. When I told her I was leaving, she said, "Find your replacement and I'll sign your recommendation." My other recommendations were from three-star generals, but the one she wrote was my most cherished.If you're willing, please describe the "decompression" process. When I walked out the door for the last time, I suddenly felt decompressed and didn't have a process that I'm aware of. I never missed "going" into w*rk. The couple of close friendships I had continued (on the outside.) I never missed the actual w*rk I had been doing. It's true that I think of Megacorp often, but the farther away it recedes, the better I remember it. I have few "bad" memories and lots of "good" though I know the human mind usually w*rks that way. Maybe THAT's what decompression means??
Perhaps because I was (for the most part) still enjoying my assignment (until they changed it) I didn't need much decompression when I left. My division director was so surprised when she heard that I was leaving, she stopped by my office and asked why. I told her: "I'm not angry, I'm not bored, I don't dislike anyone. I just don't want to do the new assignment I'm being asked to do - and I don't need to."
She seemed to understand and (still can't believe it) she gave me a hug. We'd w*rked pretty closely on some safety stuff together and accomplished a lot. I guess we had a (professional) closeness that I hadn't really thought too much about until that moment. I do treasure that moment because it was so unexpected. YMMV
That's quite different from my own experiences. I had years to plan my career exit and built a thriving consulting business to move on to. When I started this topic I had gone down to half-time and was trimming my consulting hours by raising my rates. Since then, I have given up the half-time position. Spending a year at half-time was a great help in my transition, but as a consultant, my former employer was no longer able to afford my rates.Glide path?
The plane was going down, I jumped out and pulled the rip cord. We were ready enough and hit the ground running at least. I can't imagine a years long glide path.
no more corporate goals to be met.
Actually, what I meant was my own personal corporate goals, mainly getting two engineers promoted into deserving roles. This is fully approved now and is just going through paperwork. I really wanted to get these two promoted before I retired because it is a 2-3 year process to pull it off as they don't hand out promotions lightly, it is a very heavy process to get it justified.No more "expectations". I hated that word.
No more "stake holders" that was the word I came to hate. The least descriptive word and most nebulous term I can recall from Megacorp. "Customers" I can understand, but stake holders was beyond me. It was THE buzz word as I was leaving. I never once heard it defined. Go figure. (YMMV)No more "expectations". I hated that word.
No more "stake holders" that was the word I came to hate. The least descriptive word and most nebulous term I can recall from Megacorp. "Customers" I can understand, but stake holders was beyond me. It was THE buzz word as I was leaving. I never once heard it defined. Go figure. (YMMV)
Stakeholder where I work means someone capable of escalating. It is just semantics but I always pay special attention to who are the stakeholders because those are the ones who can escalate and cause grief.
I give thanks every day that I have left that world far behind me. I never want to depend on jargon again, though it creeps in here on the FIRE Forums all the time. But here, no one is depending on me nor can they more than ban me for using the wrong word.On consulting projects in my area, "stakeholders" are those that are either directly or indirectly affected by a new policy or initiative. Failing to identify all stakeholders, and make efforts to include those stakeholders in the process, can be problematic.
The world I consult in regularly uses all kinds of nebulous terms like "stakeholders," "ecosystems," and "cross walks." Part of my expertise as a consultant involves being a native speaker of this bizarre business patois.
At least those terms are referencing something, no matter how vague. The jargon I struggle with are things like, "growth mindset" and "synergy."I give thanks every day that I have left that world far behind me. I never want to depend on jargon again, though it creeps in here on the FIRE Forums all the time. But here, no one is depending on me nor can they more than ban me for using the wrong word.