The last tread on PDI NAV got locked, so I want to emphasize this question is about muni-CEFs (NEA as an example) and only using PDI as a contrasting example that a lot of people here have expertise on. I am in no way knocking on PDI.
I'm trying to understand if a couple of formerly touted muni-CEFs (ex NEA, NVG, VKI, VGM) are appropriate for long(ish) term holdings or not.
Using data and graphs from cefconnect.com, I compared the current darling PDI vs. the now disfavored muni-CEF NEA.
I'm not in any way suggesting these two are similar, I'm only trying to figure out why one is claimed to have NAV erosion and one is not.
NEA: $0.2523 earnings per share (as of 10/31/25), distribution of $0.068 *12=$0.816:
$0.816 distributions are 3.23x >> than $0.2523 earnings.
Graphs: The since inception price/nav charts look flatish except for dipping with the 2022 rate hikes.
Price is up or flat since I bought some in October 2025.
PDI: $1.0729 earnings per share (as of 06/30/25), distribution of $0.2205*12=$2.646:
distributions 2.46x >> earnings.
Graphs: The price/nav graphs since inception look a lot more negatively slopped starting in 2019 than NEA
I originally picked up NEA because it holds higher credit quality rating municipal bonds with ~12% junk+7.6% BBB, and no AMT complications. The distribution yield is about = to my personal inflation rate and the tax exempt dividends leave headroom for roth conversions. I personally don't see the NAV erosion/destructive RoC, but apparently others look at metrics that I am missing.
What is it that makes the distributions > earnings in PDI a good thing while NEA is a NAV erosion pariah?
What other accessible data am I supposed to look at (and where do you find it without paying a subscription) to determine a "safe" longer term CEF from one to be avoided?
I'm trying to understand if a couple of formerly touted muni-CEFs (ex NEA, NVG, VKI, VGM) are appropriate for long(ish) term holdings or not.
Using data and graphs from cefconnect.com, I compared the current darling PDI vs. the now disfavored muni-CEF NEA.
I'm not in any way suggesting these two are similar, I'm only trying to figure out why one is claimed to have NAV erosion and one is not.
NEA: $0.2523 earnings per share (as of 10/31/25), distribution of $0.068 *12=$0.816:
$0.816 distributions are 3.23x >> than $0.2523 earnings.
Graphs: The since inception price/nav charts look flatish except for dipping with the 2022 rate hikes.
Price is up or flat since I bought some in October 2025.
PDI: $1.0729 earnings per share (as of 06/30/25), distribution of $0.2205*12=$2.646:
distributions 2.46x >> earnings.
Graphs: The price/nav graphs since inception look a lot more negatively slopped starting in 2019 than NEA
I originally picked up NEA because it holds higher credit quality rating municipal bonds with ~12% junk+7.6% BBB, and no AMT complications. The distribution yield is about = to my personal inflation rate and the tax exempt dividends leave headroom for roth conversions. I personally don't see the NAV erosion/destructive RoC, but apparently others look at metrics that I am missing.
What is it that makes the distributions > earnings in PDI a good thing while NEA is a NAV erosion pariah?
What other accessible data am I supposed to look at (and where do you find it without paying a subscription) to determine a "safe" longer term CEF from one to be avoided?