Spanky said:
Someone has eloquently made the following statements:
Harvard history professor Henry Adams says, "Morality is a private and costly luxury." Ironically, in today's culture of high debt and me-first living, ethics may be the only luxury some people are choosing to live without! If I believe that I have only two choices: (1) to win by doing whatever it takes, even if it's unethical; or (2) to have ethics and lose-I'm faced with a real moral dilemma. Few people set out with the desire to be dishonest, but nobody wants to lose.
I simply do not agree. When I worked in a larger firm, I worked with one of the most successful lawyers in the state. Litigation only. In Court all the time. Reputation as one tough sob, one great lawyer. He was asked/told by clients all the time to bend the line. Never, never did. Said "I can win without ..." (fill in yourself: hide bad evidence, lose bad evidence, don't disclose adverse witnesses, half answers to discovery, destroying email, bury the other side in paper, run up the other side's attorney fee bill, etc) and he never would do anything like that, and insisted that a client not do so either.
Yet, he won his cases. Taught me the kind of things you can't learn in law school.
Yeah, I know lawyers have a bad rap. Probably a topic for discussion, many reasons (cases have losers who have to blame someone, system is coercive to the loser, litigation is a legal fight and fighting leaves bruses, bad apples, greed of both clients and attorneys, etc). The point is this is a nasty business, but if the rules are known and followed the choice between following the law/morality on the one hand and success on the other does not have to be made. Hard work and following the rules and you can have both.
I suspect this is the same in any profession/occupation.
Uncledrz