At the risk of invoking the mod's wrath, I think the political nature of it will cause a very love/hate reaction from people, with little regard for how good it is as a movie itself, which is a shame regardless of which "side" one takes.
Yeah IMO that was doomed from the start, as is any such idea. You can't go home again.It's not a movie, but I just saw the "Frasier" reboot on Paramount Plus. It was horrible, nothing like the original series.
It's not a movie, but I just saw the "Frasier" reboot on Paramount Plus. It was horrible, nothing like the original series.
Yeah IMO that was doomed from the start, as is any such idea. You can't go home again.
Sounds wretched. Glad I missed it. Plus I don't think I want to see a really old Frasier, Roz etc and no Martin Crane. I'll just watch re-runs of the orig.I'm trying to figure out why it's not funny. A large part of the humor in the original series was the contrast in the social strata of the characters--Fraiser's dad, Roz, and Daphne were down to earth and Frasier, Lilith, and Niles were snobs. That dynamic is definitely missing on the reboot.
In the new series Frasier and Alan (snooty Brit) hang out at a blue collar bar. They both try to impress their boss at Harvard who is definitely not a snob so their effort is misplaced.
The characters are lifeless, humorless. There is no one making wise-cracking comments as in the old series. This is where Niles excelled, but so did Martin Crane.
The canned laugh track doesn't help.
I had heard some of the early reviews, and they were rather scathing. Hard to understand how such an experienced film maker could direct and finance such a poor film.In Palm Springs this week, 115 degrees in the afternoon so decide to go see a movie, watched Francis Ford Coppola's Megalopolis, Would have been better off outdoors baking in the sun, what a waste of time.
I have always found it odd that great directors (or actors) would fail to see how incredibly bad something is before they make it, much like I find it odd when a great musician comes out with something incredibly bad, but I guess it's that they're only human.I had heard some of the early reviews, and they were rather scathing. Hard to understand how such an experienced film maker could direct and finance such a poor film.
We have that type of theater by us too. Any 2+ hour movie we see there with the seats almost a full lie down mode if wanted.Not any particular movie, but we enjoy going to one that serves meals. Palladio Luxe is the name and serves full on menu meals and drinks as well as the standard movie snacks. Push a button, they come take your order any time. The seating is such that the server doesn't block anyone's view, but if you think it might, center isle seating avoids even that. Not cheap, but then what else can I do with my money these days?
Here's a link to the theater photos for anyone wanting to see what it's about;
Google Maps
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.www.google.com
They need new writers. It is in year 2. I don't understand how they did not learn from year 1's dreck. Hopefully it will be cancelled.I'm trying to figure out why it's not funny. A large part of the humor in the original series was the contrast in the social strata of the characters--Fraiser's dad, Roz, and Daphne were down to earth and Frasier, Lilith, and Niles were snobs. That dynamic is definitely missing on the reboot.
In the new series Frasier and Alan (snooty Brit) hang out at a blue collar bar. They both try to impress their boss at Harvard who is definitely not a snob so their effort is misplaced.
The characters are lifeless, humorless. There is no one making wise-cracking comments as in the old series. This is where Niles excelled, but so did Martin Crane.
The canned laugh track doesn't help.