Looking for a Safe Nest Egg Withdrawal Calculator for Safe withdrawal amount. - Please Read Requirements

FIRECalc. Put in your info, go to the Investigate Tab and select the bottom radio button...
View attachment 51235
You can set it for 25 years on the Start Here tab and enter SS on the Other Income/Spending tab. Include qualified and non-qualified funds in the Portfolio amount on the Start Here tab.
Just went in and did this with my info and found it really interesting, and somewhat confirming of my earlier "Lazy Sunday...." post. I have gone to numerous various Calculators, and with some minor differences gotten confirmation of my "inputs" (I say inputs because I know that drives some success bias", but that makes me feel pretty good.

Flieger
 
OP, it'll take some work doing the inputs, but you could always follow my mantra: "When in doubt, make a spreadsheet." Start with your spending needs/projections and current nest egg.
 
I would really like something simple like this one that includes SS. :) I know folks here love FireCalc, But.

Again this type of calculator uses an average rate of return, which is not how the markets work, which would thus ignore the SORR concept.
Now knowing that you don't personally invest in the stock market, the concept of SORR/Volatility of returns is minimized to some extent. However the historical range of fixed income returns can still be wide ranging.
 
Just went in and did this with my info and found it really interesting, and somewhat confirming of my earlier "Lazy Sunday...." post. I have gone to numerous various Calculators, and with some minor differences gotten confirmation of my "inputs" (I say inputs because I know that drives some success bias", but that makes me feel pretty good.

Flieger
Effectively the Investigate tab mimics the 4% guidance concept. If you leave the default inputs on Firecalc and don't use the Investigate tab, it will produce a 95% success rate, which follows the 4% guidance.
Now if you leave the default inputs and choose the Investigate tab for maximum spending, it will show the ~35k spending which close enough matches the default 35k spending input on the first page.
 
Again this type of calculator uses an average rate of return, which is not how the markets work, which would thus ignore the SORR concept.
Now knowing that you don't personally invest in the stock market, the concept of SORR/Volatility of returns is minimized to some extent. However the historical range of fixed income returns can still be wide ranging.
It is all a guess anyway. I am just trying to set the goalpost. Ball Park is OK. So, these types of calculators do answer my question. I am trying to secure 4 - 5% fixed return for the next 10 years, so it is good enough. Honestly, I am not really interested in having a really granular/accurate estimate as I will be evaluating every year. Just a little better than nest egg divided by the number of years.
 
Based on your criteria, the Flexible Retirement planner should meet your needs. You can download a free version here -



I used this as well as firecalc and others to get a gut check before retiring. The flexible planner allows you to enter numerous income and expense draws through out your plan, factor in taxes on appropriate income sources, and then runs Monte Carlo scenarios, giving you percentage success/failure outcomes. It will even run assessments to let you know what you maximum withdrawal amounts should be for a given nest egg given your predetermined flexibility. Give the instructions a good read before using it to fully benefit from the software. When I was running my plans, this was the best free planner at the time. Have fun!
 
Last edited:
It is all a guess anyway. I am just trying to set the goalpost. Ball Park is OK. So, these types of calculators do answer my question. I am trying to secure 4 - 5% fixed return for the next 10 years, so it is good enough. Honestly, I am not really interested in having a really granular/accurate estimate as I will be evaluating every year. Just a little better than nest egg divided by the number of years.
True to some extent. The Firecalc calculator is not using pure guessing. It is framed by historical actual sequencing of returns. However one doesn't know how if the future could be worse than any past 30 year returns.
Yes kind of ballparking your investments, secure income and spending from past posts, if you are able to consistently achieve even a 4% consistent return, you will be more than fine.
Having no direct heirs, it also comes down to how large you wish to have remained at the end for distribution to charities, etc.
 
All too often, we measure with a micrometer, mark with a crayon and cut with an axe. Any of these calculators will land you in the ballpark, and that's all you really need.
 
I would really like something simple like this one that includes SS. :) I know folks here love FireCalc, But.

IMO, the fatal flaw with that calculator is that you have to provide assumptions for rates of return so the results are bound by that critical assumption. WADR, it think FIRECalc's approach of using history is much better. If you're willing to accept providing investment return assumptions then you could do it with a spreadsheet.
 
It is all a guess anyway. I am just trying to set the goalpost. Ball Park is OK. So, these types of calculators do answer my question. I am trying to secure 4 - 5% fixed return for the next 10 years, so it is good enough. Honestly, I am not really interested in having a really granular/accurate estimate as I will be evaluating every year. Just a little better than nest egg divided by the number of years.
If you're ok with a fixed return, you can just use the PMT function from Excel, but use a real return rather than a nominal return if withdrawals will be increased each year for inflation.

So for example, if you have $1m, expect nominal returns to be 4% and inflation to be 2% and have a 35 year time horizon (for say 100-65) then you can withdraw $40k a year and increase the withdrawals 2% each year.

=PMT(4%-2%,100-65,-1000000,0) = 40002.21
 
When I ask an AI an approximation of your question, I get a response as follows.

Hmm, Gemini is saying this, per the link above:

Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs): If you have a traditional IRA or 401(k), you'll be required to take minimum withdrawals starting at age 59.5.

Did the RMD age change? Or is this an AI error?

Regarding FIRECalc, thanks for pointing out the Investigate tab. Very interesting to see the calculations from another angle. If you use the usual method, specifying your desired spending and seeking your chances of success, you could get a result of 100% and not know how much higher you could go on spending.

For me, the Investigate method is showing a safe WR of 5% with duration set for 40 years. Plus I experimented with a couple of different portfolios. Much more than the approximately 3% I've been spending. Perhaps time to blow more dough.
 
Hmm, Gemini is saying this, per the link above:

Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs): If you have a traditional IRA or 401(k), you'll be required to take minimum withdrawals starting at age 59.5.

Did the RMD age change? Or is this an AI error?
The AI is making stuff up. Gee. What a shock! :nonono:
 
Yeah, you need to be careful... AI can be very useful but is sometimes just plain wrong. I find oit most useful to confirm something that I think but am not totally certain is the case.
 
It is all a guess anyway. I am just trying to set the goalpost. Ball Park is OK. So, these types of calculators do answer my question. I am trying to secure 4 - 5% fixed return for the next 10 years, so it is good enough. Honestly, I am not really interested in having a really granular/accurate estimate as I will be evaluating every year. Just a little better than nest egg divided by the number of years.
What I like to do when using simple calculators is underestimate my rate of return, underestimate Social Security inflation increases and overestimate how fast our spending will grow. For example, if you think your savings/investments will grow annually by 8%, put in 6% (or less). If you think your social security COLA is going to average 3%, put in 2%. If you think your spending will increase by 4% annually put in 5% (or more). Doing that gives me kind of a worst case answer. If the end number is positive at that point, I figure we are OK. YMMV.
 
I would really like something simple like this one that includes SS. :) I know folks here love FireCalc, But.

You can enter Soc Sec in FIRECALC (Other Income tab), along with almost any other variable you'd ever need to include. If you'd spend a little time with FIRECALC, look at each tab including Investigate - or give us some specific questions (not asking for your $ amounts) - I suspect FIRECALC will do exactly what you want.

The honestmath.com calculator will do the same iteratively using Monte Carlo (instead of past actual market/inflation history) if you want to see that too.
 
All those financial calculators and simulators basically make guesses based on historical data. They can’t reliably predict what’s going to happen in the future. For instance, I've been retired for over 8 years now, and despite the recent inflation, running FIRECALC with today's information shows that I can spend 9% more than when I first retired mostly because my investments have done better than expected. But if things had gone the other way, I’d be concerned about my "safe withdrawal" rate that the calculator suggested.

Also, be cautious with calculators that factor in social security. They can be way off if there are changes in payments due to funding issues. The best solution I see for a truly "safe" amount is to invest in a 25-year (or longer) annuity, social security remains an unpredictable wild card.
 
Last edited:
^^^ What you report isn't surprising as the withdrawal at 100% success rate by FIRECalc and other SORR calculators are based on a few worst case scenarios and since we haven't had a worst case scenario over the last 8 year it is not at all surprising that a run with todays numbers allows a much higher safe withdrawal rate.
 
Also, be cautious with calculators that factor in social security. They can be way off if there are changes in payments due to funding issues. The best solution I see for a truly "safe" amount is to invest in a 25-year (or longer) annuity, social security remains an unpredictable wild card.
I agree with this statement in some respects. For some/many on here with massive "war chests" of savings, I could see a change in SS payout. However, the impact to their retirements would be limited based on their available resources. Depending the political direction in the future, we are most likely to see a means testing that will significantly reduce or negate SS for those that have done well outside of SS. For others, I think the direction would be to keep it going as-is. Where the means test "number" falls for reduction or elimination is anyones guess, but I am thinking close to or just north of $1MM in retirement and other fairly liquid savings combined... Just one persons opinion.

Flieger
 
One of the selling points of social security has been that everyone pays in and everyone takes out. It is already slanted toward lower income workers due to the bend points in the benefit formula. If we go further to transform it into a pure welfare program by taking benefits from those who have both contributed to social security and saved on their own, the program will disappear for all, because the ants eventually will refuse to subsidize the grasshoppers.
 
Last edited:
I agree with this statement in some respects. For some/many on here with massive "war chests" of savings, I could see a change in SS payout. However, the impact to their retirements would be limited based on their available resources. Depending the political direction in the future, we are most likely to see a means testing that will significantly reduce or negate SS for those that have done well outside of SS. For others, I think the direction would be to keep it going as-is. Where the means test "number" falls for reduction or elimination is anyones guess, but I am thinking close to or just north of $1MM in retirement and other fairly liquid savings combined... Just one persons opinion.

Flieger
It is already means tested although not in a major way. There are many other ways to fix the problem and if soaking the richer folks is an angle, they can just raise the threshold of SS taxes to unlimited as one resolve.
 
It is already means tested although not in a major way. There are many other ways to fix the problem and if soaking the richer folks is an angle, they can just raise the threshold of SS taxes to unlimited as one resolve.
I do know about the bend points, slanting toward the lower earners, etc. I just see a lot that says it will drive further toward what Gumby states is welfare program. A lot of things are already moving that way. That said, I hope that is not the case.

Flieger
 
Back
Top Bottom