Montecfo
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Hey, I have read most of your posts, profile etc. It seems interesting and I appreciate what you have shared.To explain it properly, I’d have to walk you through my full model, which is proprietary and built in part on years of experience. If you’re interested, you can read more in my profile.
I’ve spent years explaining this approach, and most people simply weren’t paying attention.
Here’s a common strategy used by several, not me: Someone holds a 60/40 portfolio. After stocks drop 20%, they rebalance—using the 40% in bonds and cash to buy more equities. At the bottom, that portfolio may be down 12–15%.
But that also means the portfolio still absorbs a large share of market losses. If stocks fall 50%, the portfolio could easily decline 25%. That’s not acceptable to me in retirement.
Another approach is to allocate to alternative funds (ALT funds) that aim to outperform or hedge risk. The problem is that, over time, most of these strategies haven’t delivered consistently strong results.
At this stage of life, I’m not trying to maximize returns. I already have enough. My priority is limiting downside risk. In my view, the most reliable way to do that is to sell and protect capital.
As the article explains, avoiding the worst market days can make a significant difference in long-term outcomes.
(www.cambriainvestments.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Where-the-Black-Swans-Hide-the-10-Best-Days-Myth.pdf)
It is kind of financial burlesque.