In reading these messages, I get the impression that a lot of posters think there is something wrong with someone who doesn't want a new car. I bought my Toyota Rav4 new in 2008 after my previous 11 year old Honda CRV got totaled in a crash. After 18 years I have no interest in replacing it. My current car still runs great, gets about the same mileage as any new equivalent non-hybrid car, and I know where all the controls are. Also important to me is that it has a fender mounted antenna that clearly brings in AM/FM stations and doesn't interfere with my use of the roof rack. Sure, it's needed a few repairs along the way, but that's a lot less expensive than buying a new car. If your son is happy with his older car just let him stay with it. Who knows, maybe someday it will become a valuable antique collector's item.
Exactly right. When it comes to cars, new is not always better than old. I have both old and new cars and in many instances, I prefer the older ones. My newest is a 2024, so what follows is not meant to deter folks from buying a new car, it's more of just a message about the evolution of cars and trucks in general.
The "new safety features" guard mainly against distracted drivers who can't seem to pay attention and won't stay off their phones. What's really ironic, is the safety features built into new cars guard against the drivers that are too busy searching for something on the screen in the center of the dash as designed on their new cars, instead of keeping their eyes on the road. There's no tactile feel of controls on a center screen like there was with the knobs and buttons on the old cars that allowed you to keep your eyes on the road.
The mandated push for higher and higher fuel economy has led manufacturers to resort to increased complexity on newer cars, and because of this complexity, in general, years down the road, the new will never be as trouble free and easy to repair as the older models. For example, take full size Chevy and GMC trucks, including Suburban / Tahoe / Yukon, etc. A decade or more ago, these were pretty durable and reliable vehicles. Because of this incessant push for EPA mandated fuel economy, GM introduced 10 speed automatic transmissions that are absolute nightmares after they get some significant miles on them. Torque converter failures are commonplace and in the worst cases, they'll lock up while driving. Instead of fixing the problem when you bring the vehicle in for the recall, GM decided not to fix the issue with premature transmission failure, they instead install a software update that programs a message to come up on the dash 10,000 miles before the transmission may lock up for you to bring it in to the the dealer for a new transmission. As insane as this sounds, it's true. You can Google all the details if you wish. The Ford Ecoboost nightmares are another example. There's many, many more examples from many different manufacturers out there. With the increased complexity, comes increased weight, powered by smaller engines that have to work harder than the engines they replaced. Often times, turbochargers are added to the smaller engines to boost output which means even more complexity. So the consumer ends up with much more complex newer vehicles with about the same fuel economy as the older ones, but a decrease in overall reliability and increased repair costs in the long term.