Midpack
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I'm open to other POVs here.
I'm still on the fence with this one. I use strong unique passwords (randomly generated using Excel), change them at some frequency and don't reuse usernames/passwords for sensitive sites (I do reuse passwords for non sensitive sites like forums, etc.). My passwords aren't on my PC for more than a few seconds a year, they're on a USB or paper - so they're almost unhackable (unless by a key logger?).
I have no doubt an uncompromised password manager is still a much more robust solution to password strength and management. However, password managers can be hacked, you can do a search to confirm (but 1 credible example below). Almost every online entity glowingly swears they're security is bulletproof - until they're hacked. We've seen that over and over again. Some hackers are just as sophisticated and creative as the "good guys" and that doesn't seem likely to change?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/tech...-have-security-flaw-you-should-still-use-one/
I'm still on the fence with this one. I use strong unique passwords (randomly generated using Excel), change them at some frequency and don't reuse usernames/passwords for sensitive sites (I do reuse passwords for non sensitive sites like forums, etc.). My passwords aren't on my PC for more than a few seconds a year, they're on a USB or paper - so they're almost unhackable (unless by a key logger?).
I have no doubt an uncompromised password manager is still a much more robust solution to password strength and management. However, password managers can be hacked, you can do a search to confirm (but 1 credible example below). Almost every online entity glowingly swears they're security is bulletproof - until they're hacked. We've seen that over and over again. Some hackers are just as sophisticated and creative as the "good guys" and that doesn't seem likely to change?
The best answer may well be from the article "Yes, there is risk in storing all your passwords in one place with a password manager. But it’s helpful to look at the risk like a hacker: There’s no “safe” and “unsafe.” There’s “safer than,” or “better than.” Being 100 percent safe would require disconnecting from the Internet and moving to an undisclosed bunker." Unfortunately, they also suspect more hackers may target password managers, escalating the battle and successful attacks.WP said:The question that has haunted these programs is: How is it possibly safe to put all your passwords in one basket? If someone steals it, you’re hosed.
A new study has identified security flaws in five of the most popular password managers. [ 1Password, Dashlane, KeePass, LastPass and RoboForm] 1Password, LastPass and Roboform even exposed master passwords, used to unlock all your other passwords. “The ‘lock’ button on password managers is broken — some more severely than others,” said lead researcher Adrian Bednarek.
Now for some counterintuitive advice: I still think you should use a password manager. So do the ethical hackers with Independent Security Evaluators who came to me with news of the flaws — and other security pros I spoke to about the study, published Tuesday. You wouldn’t stop using a seat belt because it couldn’t protect you from every kind of vehicle accident. The same applies to password managers.
But the research, which finds password manager users are vulnerable to targeted malware attacks, does shine a light on ways to bolster our defenses. And it speaks to a bigger truth that gets lost in headlines about breaches and bugs: Online safety isn’t about being unhackable; it’s about not being the lowest-hanging fruit.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/tech...-have-security-flaw-you-should-still-use-one/
Last edited: